Richard (dicksosa) In the style of the half budget b-grade sci-fi films Antibody delivers just about what it promises. Low quality acting, writing, sets and special effects. The film takes at least a novel approach in trying to come up with a new idea for a sci-fi film. Gaynes, played by Lance Henriksen, is a bomb specialist who botches an assignment. However it was a mistake because the technology was brand new. The unlikely hero finds himself in the right place at the right time when the technology comes around again. That new technology being the bomb detonator being implanted in the person themselves and linked to their vitals. The person with the detonator dies, the bomb goes off. So how do you figure out how to disarm the bomb. While you shrink yourself down in a ship that can travel the human body and disarm the bomb. From ridiculous dialog too poor acting this movie is mostly a waste of time. There is a scene in which two characters, who are members of the shrunken crew, discuss the fact that they have to lie about what they do for a living to their parents. The first states " my parents still think I work at Starbucks." The response, "I told my parents I'm in the XFL" "Aren't you worried they will find out you are lying?" "Are you kidding no one watches the XFL." Buh dun clash... There the best part of the movie removed so you can save the two hours it cost me to watch it.

r-schrager-620-898947 Exceedingly bad in all aspects, but you can't look away. If Mystery Science Theater 3000 was still out there, this would be at the top of their list. The plot is shamelessly stolen from "Fantastic Voyage" without an acknowledging nod or a wink. The twists - as they are - can be seen coming from a mile away. The special effects must have been gleaned from cuttings from FVs cutting room floor. The dialog appears to have been the result of a bet among the writers to see how many times they could use the s-word. This one is a treat right from the opening credits to the last line of dialog. Must be watched without commercial interruption, otherwise you may be tempted to turn it off.

zombieman1978 I would not go as far as calling it a good movie, but it is pure cheese. the acting is mainly awful, cgi effects cheesy, just a fun movie. what Roger Corman would make, except with computers. worth a look. the movie is about a team goes through a terrorist's blood stream to dismantle a tiny detonator for several nukes. it is a bad movie, but a fun one. i would recommend it to fans of bad movies. Lance henrikson is kinda good as an ex-bomb squad officer who is called in to duty. The cgi is hilarious, the acting deplorable, just a enjoyable movie with some of the worst actors i've ever seen, & one of the most confusing romances ever! i don't understand how lance henrikson could get her? oh well.

davideo-2 STAR RATING:*****Unmissable****Very Good***Okay**You Could Go Out For A Meal Instead*Avoid At All CostsDr Richard Gaynes (Lance Henriksen) is a bomb disposal expert for the FBI.That is,until a terrible mistake forces him to resign his post and a few years later,he becomes a surveillance man.When a team of terrorists seize control of a building,a shoot out ensues and the head man is shot.However,medics must battle to keep him alive,as he has placed a detonating device inside himself that,should he die,will cause a massive explosion.The renowned Dr Theodore Bichall (Valizer Binev) has a secret underground science lab where he is working on a revolutionary new technology that will allow Gaynes and a team of scientists lead by Dr Rachel Saverini (Robin Givens) to enter the terrorist's body by means of a small ship and deactivate the detonating device.With time running out,Gaynes and his team must battle to deactivate the device before it's too late.This film originally caught my eye in the video store.I checked the back,and the concept sounded very intriguing,especially being one for a straight-to-video movie.I can't remember exactly how recently this was,but it certainly arrived on these shores a fair while after it's original year of release,2002.However,upon starting to watch it,I was able to pick something up very quickly.Aside from dealing with the bomb,somewhere another agent who is in close contact with Gaynes must deal with an Islamic man who is waving a gun in the air and singing something that sounds like a religious hymn (well,it don't sound like The Fast Food Song,that's for sure).There is talk that the man might have a detonating device of his own implanted in his body that will cause the present bomb to go off.And from here on in,the hidden symbolism becomes very clear.This is very September 11th themed,right down to the idea of suicide bombers and the general threat of terrorism that had become very present in the world.It would be easy to say that the main plot of the movie has notable plot holes,but then it could be making a point of how true it is in the world today,like,of course terrorists would be able to sneak in to an important venue where an important speech is about to be delivered disguised as video equiptment installer men.Er,yeah maybe they would.It seems like not a day goes by where the tabloids don't feature stories of lax security at important venues and undercover reporters getting in as such and such (the British tabloids,anyway.)It kind of feels like the film jumped on the backwagon of the public conscious and the fears of the public one year after those terrible events and seems to be engaging in a spot of the IL' cynical exploitation.Aside from this,much of the film just ends up lost anyway.It appears very cheaply filmed,and full of no-name Russian actors with funny sounding names on account of the barely there budget.They're very bad no-name actors too (well,there you go) and they turn in some very bad,blank acting.Throw into that a patchy,ineffective script and an increasingly far-fetched,ridiculous plot and the only thing the movie ultimately leaves you with is perhaps a desire for a remedy against any future bad films.**