Scars_Remain The general public will, of course, not accept this film because it goes against what they have been told for their entire lives. I've seen a lot of people say how the arguments in this film are irrelevant or just plain stupid but I haven't seen any of them explain why. You can bash it all you want, but I'd like to hear you back it up.I felt that the evidence and arguments were interesting and convincing. I guess I should make it clear that I believe both sides are possible so I'm open to either one. I really liked how this film was done and how it left me feeling. Is it really possible that NASA could have fooled us all into thinking that they went to moon but actually didn't? I think so. You'll have to decide for yourself.

jsman-1 Haha! I love this little documentary. Its a brilliant case of gullibility and the ease of which the human mind can so easily be manipulated.Of course no man has ever been on the moon! Are you kidding me? I can't believe anyone would believe that. To all of you out there who have actually seen this documentary and still believe man has been to moon - just one simple question - did you see the same thing I just saw?! My favorite part about the whole documentary is the awesome NASA spokesperson who gets paid 50 grand a year and probably a nice bonus to appear on the show. For EACH and EVERY argument, not just one, but EVERY argument put forward against the moon landing he offers absolutely no factual or evidential based rebuttal - just preferring to call any theories "crazy" or "ridiculous" - I mean what's more difficult than that! We never once get any information on his educational background,and how or why he is qualified to refute such claims. The only two guys to back-up NASA's story are both paid employees of NASA!Meanwhile, hoards of physicists, engineers, photography experts - people with ACTUAL educational qualifications queue up to categorically laugh over the absurdity of NASA's claims. I love it! I love the rubbish camera work. I love the conflicting and multiple light sources. I love the moon lander with aluminum foil feet. I mean I actually laughed when watching it!Of course the documentary is one-sided, but quite simply it is what it is. 1+1=2, there is no way around it. If it seems like it is slanted in a conspiracy theorists favor, then it is because the factual evidence points to a conspiracy theory!A recommended documentary for anyone of intellectual substance.

loleralacartelort7890 The fact is that USA DID go to the moon. Why: USA brought back moon-rocks. That is hundreds of pounds of rocks from the moon. And it is a fact that they all did not come from the moon: they all came from the same planet. This is because the internal isotopes of basic elements of the rocks are of a kind that could NOT have been created by the earths crust. Seriously: don't you CT's read, go to college and ask your professors?? I do. These rocks could not have come from Meteors, because they are of the same material and have no signs of recently been burned. All these rocks have after wards been distributed all over the world, for all sorts of independent scientists to have made analysts on them. Thousands of scientists, who all came to the same conclusion that they all came from the moon. So it is very unlikely that the Apollo-missions where faked. Because there is no other way NASA could have got hold of so many Moon-rocks. Prope-mission would only bring back too little, and people know what mission that every single rocket is sent to do. NASA landed on the Moon - deal with it.Also: if the Americans faked the moon-landing, then why didn't the Russians reveal it?? That is the point that reveals that CT's don't think out of the box. They all make it seem that all things only happens in USA. But as a European i have a different perspective. Before every single launch into space, all space-agencies have to tell the military of the opposing site that it is not a missile fired against them. Because the Apollo-rocket would have the Radar-signature of a ICBM on the Russians Radar-screen. And here is the thing that reveals no moon hoax: The Russians monitored that a Rocket fired from USA, fired out of the Earths atmosphere, left the earth, and a smaller craft came back some days after. The same happened with all the missions. If the Apollo missions where faked, why didn't the Russians reveal it to the world?? It was the Cold War, for Petes sake!Also: there were reporters in NASA's control-center, during the mission. The Astronauts did speak with the NASA-controllers Live, and did things live. Reports have said this since. So it could not have been a tape.PS: Do you know how many people should have been involved in such a conspiracy?? Thousands!

Carsten Klapp This so-called documentary does a poor job at presenting various possible viewpoints and misuses or ignores the applications of physical and optical laws. FOX could have done so much more with this interesting topic. This film only serves to hurt the credibility whether FOX is capable of producing a documentary.Disjointed sequences of very short interview clips with only a handful of people present their opinions and analyses. No independent engineers or optical experts were consulted about the physics-related theories presented to provide additional insight.The film tries and fails miserably to inspire the viewer to ask more questions than the film tries to answer. The intelligent viewer may learn that without a rudimentary understanding of physics, gravity, and optics one can easily "prove" just about anything.There is lots of nice NASA footage, but nothing that can't be found in other well-written documentaries.