Dracula (The Dirty Old Man)

Dracula (The Dirty Old Man)

1969 "He slaked his thirst with the blood of innocent young virgins"
Dracula (The Dirty Old Man)
Dracula (The Dirty Old Man)

Dracula (The Dirty Old Man)

3.4 | 1h20m | en | Horror

Dracula enslaves Dr. Irving Jekyll, turning him into the lycanthropic JackalMan, demanding that he lure female blood donors to his L.A. cabin retreat.

View More
AD

WATCH FREEFOR 30 DAYS

All Prime Video
Cancel anytime

Watch Now
3.4 | 1h20m | en | Horror , Comedy | More Info
Released: December. 11,1969 | Released Producted By: Vega international Pictures , Country: Budget: 0 Revenue: 0 Official Website:
Synopsis

Dracula enslaves Dr. Irving Jekyll, turning him into the lycanthropic JackalMan, demanding that he lure female blood donors to his L.A. cabin retreat.

...... View More
Stream Online

The movie is currently not available onine

Cast

Director

William Edwards

Producted By

Vega international Pictures ,

AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

All Prime Video Movies and TV Shows. Cancel anytime.

Watch Now

Trailers & Images

Cast

Reviews

Michael_Elliott Dracula (The Dirty Old Man ) (1969) * 1/2 (out of 4) Count Alucard (Vince Kelley) is a pervert and needs a supply of young naked women so he turns a man (Billy Whitton) into a werewolf who goes out and gets them. The werewolf brings the women back to Alucard who chains them up in his basement, rips their clothes off and has a good time.This sexploitation movie is far from being awful but at the same time it could have been much, much better with a little more effort. Dracula THE DIRTY OLD MAN is pretty much a reason for people in 1969 to throw down a buck and see naked women and there's no doubt that there are plenty of naked young woman on display. If that's what you're into then you're going to see countless breasts, butts and other regions of the female body. If you're looking for plot..... Well, this isn't going to be the movie for you.There are some hilarious moments scattered throughout the film, although not all of them are intentional. The film was shot silent and it's clear that they wanted this to be a "comedy" about a perverted vampire and werewolf. The voice-over dialogue has a few funny moments throughout including one about Dracula's mother bat. Most of the comedy is unintentional including the hilarious werewolf costume, which is pretty much just a mask and at times you can see it coming off of the actors head. This really puts you in an Ed Wood frame of mind and especially the film he wrote ORGY OF THE DEAD.The biggest problem with the film is that nothing really happens in the 69-minutes. We get the same thing repeated over and over and over and over. The werewolf kidnaps a woman. She is chained up. Her clothes are taken off. Next woman. A little more thought could have made for a much better movie but fans of sexploitation will still want to watch this at least once.
Johann I haven't seen this film in awhile, but remember it pretty vividly. The film was obviously shot on a really low budget and without any real actors. It has a kind of "Manos" feel to it, but with nudity and even worse special effects. There are bats that are obviously on wires and some pretty cheesy costumes. The guy doing Dracula's voice sounds like an old Jewish man (I don't know where the hell they got the idea to make Dracula Jewish, considering he was Transylvanian). The only thing that I liked about this movie is that it didn't take itself seriously at all.Count Dracula is living in an abandoned mine in the middle of nowhere. He invites a local reporter to visit him (he goes under the pseudonym of Alucard, hee hee hee, like nobody's ever heard that before). When the inept reporter gets there, Dracula turns him into a pretty crappy looking wolf man, named Irving Jackelmann (enough with the Jewish jokes already). Dracula then sends him out to catch beautiful girls for him to tie up, love up and drain dry. Dracula takes a hankering for the reporter's girl friend and ends up chasing her around his cave.The opening ten minutes have some really awful stream of consciousness speech by the reporter involving the blue mountains, behind the blue mountains, behind the blue mountains (we get it already). Dracula's accent is just plain annoying. Irving Jackelmann also proves to be pretty bad. The chase scene, for the love of God, was only a nude woman running around the same set for an excruciatingly long time. The nudity can't save it and the jokes, although trying hard to be campy, are just plain dumb.Avoid unless you can spare a few brain cells.
JoeKarlosi This is a really awful "comedy" film about a vampire who turns a guy into a werewolf so wolfie can kidnap girls and bring them back to a cave for his master to feel up. Even the wolf gets to have sex with a couple of them. We do get to see some naked chicks but that's about it.It could have worked as a pretty gruesome movie if it had been played straight (don't ask me how); instead, they opted for the comedy routine, and it's about as funny as a car wreck. The finished product plays like a terrible episode of the MYSTERY SCIENCE THEATER television show, where the original sound seems like it's been turned off so a group of dummies can try to narrate their own stupid dialogue over the action, in between guzzling their six packs. 0 out of ****
rlcsljo I have seen a lot of "sexy shockers", but this one is definitely the top of the line (for a pretty low line). Using a badly dubbed fake jewish accent (no wonder Dracula was afraid of the cross--he's a Jew!), and special effects that are entirely quick cuts, he turns a playboy newspaper reporter into "Wolf Man"--and what a wolf he is! He kidnaps sweet, mostly young things for his "master" and what dracula doesn't molest, "Wolf Man" rapes himself(girls are nude, guys mostly keep their clothes on)! For 1969, the girls in this movie appear to be in pretty good shape and most of it appears to be natural. This movie is a "must own" for fans of this genre!