Kingsman: The Golden Circle

Kingsman: The Golden Circle

2017 "A proper spy movie."
Kingsman: The Golden Circle
Kingsman: The Golden Circle

Kingsman: The Golden Circle

6.7 | 2h21m | R | en | Adventure

When an attack on the Kingsman headquarters takes place and a new villain rises, Eggsy and Merlin are forced to work together with the American agency known as the Statesman to save the world.

View More
Rent / Buy
amazon
Rent from $3.79
AD

WATCH FREEFOR 30 DAYS

All Prime Video
Cancel anytime

Watch Now
6.7 | 2h21m | R | en | Adventure , Action , Comedy | More Info
Released: September. 22,2017 | Released Producted By: 20th Century Fox , Shangri-La Entertainment Country: United States of America Budget: 0 Revenue: 0 Official Website: http://www.foxmovies.com/movies/kingsman-the-golden-circle
Synopsis

When an attack on the Kingsman headquarters takes place and a new villain rises, Eggsy and Merlin are forced to work together with the American agency known as the Statesman to save the world.

...... View More
Stream Online

The movie is currently not available onine

Cast

Colin Firth , Julianne Moore , Taron Egerton

Director

Julia Castle

Producted By

20th Century Fox , Shangri-La Entertainment

AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

All Prime Video Movies and TV Shows. Cancel anytime.

Watch Now

Trailers & Images

Reviews

schuster_mark I loved the first Kingsman. Original, witty and uniquely BRITISH. Yes, I'm American, but I loved that the original was anything BUT completely Hollywood! So many crappy movies come out of Hollywood every year with the exact same formula and exact same actors. The original Kingsman was refreshing and uniquely different with it's approach and ensemble. This one, not so much. Jeff Bridges?? Julianne Moore?? Halle Berry!!!??? Ugh!! Been there, done that! This movie didn't need their star power (as fading as it may be). It already had what it needed! They could have easily found an actress as talented as Julianne Moore to play the villain (and much cheaper too!). Jeff Bridges? I love this guy (Crazy Heart,The Big Lebowski) - but for every great movie he makes - he's in 10 horrible movies for a paycheck!! I can only surmise the "Great American Sellout" came down to money. Sad. Why do sequels so often go astray from the formula that worked so well with the original??Beyond all of this - it was still a fun movie to watch. It was good, but could have been great. The only other complaint was ELTON JOHN's role in this film. I'm still scratching my head. Yes - he's a musical icon - yes he's about as famous as it gets - but his scenes were just silly and stupid. It was like the writer was a huge fan and figured if he wrote enough flattering scenes he'd get the big guy. Well, I guess it worked - sadly for the film.Like the original? Then watch this one, but don't expect that same European flavor - distinctly British feel - and uniqueness. This is clearly an American franchise now.
brian-49621 I don't know what the fuss was about, this is the second sequel I've watched recently for the first time after hearing some really poor reviews.(justice League, which I also enjoyed) This film is amazing. I loved it immensely as much as the first, which I watched with no preconceptions at all. It's clever, funny, and at more than 2 hours keeps you watching the whole time.
TownRootGuy I felt like they were slapping me with one hand and using the other to pay me to ignore the burning on my cheek. Maybe this is on me but I expected more than 30 seconds of screen time from Sophie Cookson. She was my main reason for forgiving their having killed off Gazelle in the first one. As a small note, there is a brief flashback of Sofia Boutella, so.... does that even the scales...? The Sophie/Sofia issue aside, you just can't allude to a small gift made at the end of the first film w/o leaving the viewer with the expectation that gift will be repeated. And WTF was with the young Burt Reynolds look? I couldn't decide if it was cool or offensive. If you can get past all that, or just don't care, then the payoff is that this has good eye candy, a decent cast, great action, fantastic FX AND they whip up a few chuckles. This is probably only watchable every 3 - 5 years. At least I now know what isn't in it.
troydanielson101 How many times must Hollywood squander perfect and (oh, so rare) opportunities to create new Tentpole Franchises by loading follow ups to truly entertaining films with celebrities/actors on the edge of relevance? With "Kingsman: The Golden Circle" the filmmakers took a path to destruction so well worn and well posted that it's literally mind numbing to conceive that they actually, with knowledge and forethought, took it!!! In this sequel, the springboard that was the original "Kingsman" was crushed under the weight of a cast, so liberally littered with actors in some stage of has been"ism" that it resembled an episode of "Dancing with the Stars" or an ABC "Celebrity Circus" special. So blatant is the assault on the intelligence, not to mention "taste" of the viewer, that one has to wonder if this wasn't done intentionally. Some form of "Sabotage" perhaps? What else could possibly explain why these filmmakers, with a template for success ("Kingsman" #1) would let one poor decision after another, i.e. juvenile storyline, manipulative political pandering, horrendous script, antiquated special effects and disastrous casting choices, steer what should have been installment #2 of an awesomely entertaining franchise, straight into the porcelain bowl of lost opportunity? To be honest, I'm really not quite sure if it comes down to filmmakers believing that this is what moviegoers find entertaining or if they are truly incapable of examining what makes a film work and subsequently following that formula, because I KNOW they can do better than "Kingsman GC" they just didn't want to badly enough. My advice?.... keep your money in your pocket until they do!!! It's the only "sign" they heed!!!