Jimgaddis
I just rented "Lost" from iTunes for $.99. Can I have my 99 cents and 90 minutes back? Yes it's "Phonebooth" + "Duel" + a few other bad movies I can't put my finger on right now. And CHEAP! Looks likely was shot in two days for about $1000.Voiceovers by Danny Trejo and somebody (my guess is the writer of this travesty) doing ALL of the other voices ( radio & TV voiceovers, "audio guru", even the VERY bad hysterical Mexican woman) Ludicrous writing. NO production values. NO character development. NO suspense. Also, there aren't that many roads in the entire state of Nevada! And the ridiculous road and place names sounded like the writer was sitting in his apartment in Santa Barbera ( where the story starts) and just picked random cul-de-sac names from his posh housing development! C'mon, guy! Do a LITTLE research before you kill an entire weekend banging out a script! At least pretend to strive for a teeny bit of authenticity! I won't say I'm disappointed because this is just the kind of crap I would expect to see Dean Cain in.
maffo_6
Watched this when it was shown on TV. Completely shocked by just how good it was! Wondered how it could never have been shown at cinemas, despite an obviously low budget.Been a fan of Dean Cain for a long time, ever since New Adventures of Superman. I do agree, however, with the other comment on here and Cain has been terribly type cast because of it. This really gives him the chance to change that view, which he does with style.Dain Cain is fantastic; really gets a chance to show off his acting skills, and Danny Trejo makes a chilling villain. Unexpected plot twists at every turn. Well worth a watch. Seriously, watch it! Now!
Boba_Fett1138
This is a nice little movie. It's nothing too fancy or big but just provide some good decent 90 minutes to enjoy.It's a good written story. They used all of the script its potential and it provides the movie with a couple of nice and original moments, despite its unoriginal and restrained concept, budget and settings. You can also really thank the director for that, who brings everything very stylish to the screen.Still the story has some lesser and more silly parts. Such as the way the main character is leaving a trail is unbelievable. Hard to imaging that anyone could be really that dumb and obvious in a situation like that.It's unfortunately also a movie that begins very well and has a good middle but toward the ending it starts to loose some of its power and creativity, when the story starts to loose more and more of its credibility. A shame really.The acting is good surprisingly and it definitely uplifts the movie and makes it feel more professional than its budget would allow it to be. Dean Cain plays a good main character and he gives away a nice performance. And hey, it also has Danny Trejo in it as the main villain. We don't too often get to see him as such but his role is also more limited down as you would perhaps expect.Still a movie well worth seeing.6/10http://bobafett1138.blogspot.com/
bobbyhonea
all in all it was a pretty good flick,but a few questions need to be addressed;first off he was driving a brand new something perhaps a BMW i dunno couldn't really tell, but he did run low on fuel and had to stop and fill up,but later when he was driving the 1980,81 ford f-150 p.u. gas was no longer an issue.(i drove one of those gas hogs for years),and his ran pretty damn good for $500; 2.if archer was such a good Apache tracker why couldn't he see the rush cover-up job that Stanton did with his tire tracks in the sand when he hid behind the billboard? i mean the apache man did see a cigarette butt on the highway while doing 70!; 3. how in the hell did archer figure out he was using g.p.s. and Judy at that? but in the end i thought she was working with the feds and was leading him into a trap for a reward.
AD
