One Day

One Day

2011 "Twenty years. Two people."
One Day
One Day

One Day

7 | 1h47m | PG-13 | en | Drama

A romantic comedy centered on Dexter and Emma, who first meet during their graduation in 1988 and proceed to keep in touch regularly. The film follows what they do on July 15 annually, usually doing something together.

View More
Rent / Buy
amazon
Buy from $7.99 Rent from $3.79
AD

WATCH FREEFOR 30 DAYS

All Prime Video
Cancel anytime

Watch Now
7 | 1h47m | PG-13 | en | Drama , Romance | More Info
Released: August. 19,2011 | Released Producted By: Color Force , Film4 Productions Country: United States of America Budget: 0 Revenue: 0 Official Website: http://www.focusfeatures.com/one_day
Synopsis

A romantic comedy centered on Dexter and Emma, who first meet during their graduation in 1988 and proceed to keep in touch regularly. The film follows what they do on July 15 annually, usually doing something together.

...... View More
Stream Online

The movie is currently not available onine

Cast

Anne Hathaway , Jim Sturgess , Tom Mison

Director

Sue Whitaker

Producted By

Color Force , Film4 Productions

AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

All Prime Video Movies and TV Shows. Cancel anytime.

Watch Now

Trailers & Images

Reviews

robinssa-98507 Fine actors as they all are the casting let's the original story down. Em is supposed to be a down-to-earth socially inept plain Jane with a broad Yorkshire accent. By contrast Dexter is a posh kid, louche, slightly out of control. Neither action really channels this. Ann Hathaway can't be disguised as plain just by putting a pair of spectacles on her, and her accent is as cut glass as dexter. Meanwhile D just appears sleepy. Not the clear distinction on which the book thrives.
Kirpianuscus romanticism. humor. slices of drama. meetings. and the same July 15Emma and Dexter. the seed of graduation and the passing years. and the inspired performance of Jim Sturgess in a film who seams ignore the characters. because One Day is only chronicle of a relation. the characters are only silhouettes who the public must imagine. the story is nice and seductive and emotional but not always coherent. or credible. something missing. and it is not exactly a small detail. because on the screen is presented a growing up relation . but the subject is far to be original and the end reminds too many similar. I admit, I have not read the book. and this does to supposed that the film is just a part of the industry around a popular literary success.but it is not a sin. because it is a nice story of a relation, better then many contemporary romantic films.
elizdere The book upon which this movie is based was mediocre - easy to read, but nothing special. This movie is even less interesting, partly as a result of the casting choices. There's nothing horrible about it, but it's just not very good. Baby-faced Jim Sturgess was a poor choice for a movie that follows two friends/maybe lovebirds over the course of a decade. He has charm, but lacks gravitas, and the make-up artists could not figure out how to age him appropriately. Anne Hathaway, while always likable, had trouble mastering whatever British accent she was going for. Presumably she was cast because they'd rather have a big name than find an appropriate Brit for the role. Stronger actors could have made a big difference for the lackluster script. However, the biggest issue was the story and the pacing. Scenes kept cutting off before any emotional connection could be made and the overall plot did not seem to be building toward any big moments. Moments that should have been capitalized on were rushed or thrown aside too quickly. It all seemed random and insignificant. The actors didn't seem connected to their roles, which made it hard for viewers to do so. Overall, it was fine, but ultimately unsatisfying.
Mr. Benedict Samurai It's a love story that slowly tells itself and shows the personal development of the characters. The scenes were well chosen, but the characters were shallow. They had this British typical inability to deal with emotional stuff though; however, it only meant over two hours of agony. The characters evolved normally. No ridiculous stuff. Still not recommended. No real plot twists that were surprising. The beautiful scenery and authentic decors are not enough to make a movie worth watching for more than 2 hours. The end was no surprise to me at least. The movie got me bored at middle the night, at a hospital, with nothing else to do. Watching commercials could have been more fresh.