aliasstone Horrible and awful. And those are the kind words. Don't waste your time on this one. I watched this after watching Joel Gilbert's "Elvis Found Alive" which was somewhat entertaining (not really), but Gilbert went way too far in making up the myth of McCartney's death. Harrison's accent in this movie was laughable and I'm surprised there wasn't a lawsuit from his estate on how George was used in order to line Gilbert's pockets with a few extra bucks. Again, don't waste your time.

ice ruby red I am not a researcher of Beatle trivia. I am old enough to remember their debut, and I love them and their music, but I couldn't give you dates or data about their recordings, don't know their birthdays, and never played an album backwards. That said, I couldn't help but be astounded by the plethora of symbols and innuendos that overwhelmingly point to Paul's death and a cover up. It goes way beyond coincidence! One or two symbols or rumors, okay.. but this goes deep and went on and on for years!It was only when I got to the one and a half hour point in the documentary (and yes, this was a documentary until the backlash forced the producers to re-classify it a "mockumentary") that I knew it was contrived: Heather Mills could not have been "Rita", the cause of the "accident" – she did not yet exist at the time!! Later, I read that Rubber Soul came out in 1965, which meant that the reason here for the name Rubber Soul (in lieu of "Rubber Paul", based on Paul's supposed death) could not have been true, since the "death" was to have occurred in 1966.Another falsehood in this film is when you hear George, in an interview, refer to Paul as "Faul", not once, but twice. I read that in the real interview he clearly said "Paul", so this was dubbed for the sake of this documentary. Too bad, because I can't help but think that there might be something to this theory, now scoffed at because of the lies in this docu-mocku-mentary. There are just too many symbols, lyrics, etc, to be nothing more than an elaborate game the boys were playing. If it was a game, it dragged on too long. In photo after photo and album after album Paul is intentionally set apart from the other Beatles. I'm sure these performers considered themselves artists. I don't buy that they spent all that time and effort turning their entire careers into a "Paul is dead" game just for the sake of a little joke and some publicity. I have to wonder if this video is for the purpose of being a red herring? No one would go through the trouble of creating this elaborate exposé, only to throw in some obvious fakes that could be disproved in a moment, such as that Heather Mills, who wasn't even born yet in 1966, could have been the cause of the accident. Surely the guy who put together this nearly 2-hour long, detailed documentary, could not be that stupid. Of course, if he created, or was convinced to create this for the sole purpose of discrediting the entire "Paul is Dead" discussion .... it's a resounding success!

amber5672005 My nephew who has become fascinated with conspiracy theories showed this to me...his only question was how could a right handed guitarist become so proficient playing left handed(seriously, he said that) Practically from the beginning of this DVD the poor documentation was evident:the voice of "George" was so bad they should have had a contest to find a better sound-alike. Time sequences were off regarding the last two albums,most of the backward messages were so implausible it was laughable, claiming Heather Mills was Rita though she was born until after the accident,etc. A comment from "George" about Ringo being stupid was so off the mark it was insulting.Supposedly, the tapes were made on a micro-cassette recorder in a hospital and yet, the sound quality could have only been obtained in a studio (and no background sounds were evident,virtually impossible in a hospital) They didn't even bother to claim evidence to verify the authenticity of either the voice of "George" or the pre-accident and post accident Paul using voice analysis(too damaging to their theory, I guess)

Xaaralia Sorry, but I can't accept this narrative at face value. The "evidence" is really a re-hash of previously presented material. But it falls apart on the audio quality of the recordings. Supposedly recorded on a mini-cassette recorder, it must of been the single best mini-cassette recorder ever manufactured. Also, while "George's" voice is acceptable, his manner of speaking is too theatrical, as if it's a performance. It's definitely not the speech of a man candidly dictating a story in a state of panic from a hospital bed.But, the story is entertaining...even compelling. And if one day some new evidence, DNA or other, corroborating this story ever surfaces, I think my reaction would be a wry smile.