TheLittleSongbird Was very fond of Woody Woodpecker and his cartoons as a child. Still get much enjoyment out of them now as a young adult, even if there are more interesting in personality cartoon characters and better overall cartoons.That is in no way knocking Woody, because many of his cartoons are a lot of fun to watch and more and also still like him a lot as a character. This is going to be a reiteration of a lot of my reviews for the later Woody Woodpecker cartoons, but mainly because the later Paul J. Smith-directed cartoons have pretty much the same strengths and faults. 'Roamin Roman' is a lacklustre effort, many of Smith's late 50s onwards Woody Woodpecker cartoons are average or less and 'Roamin Roman' to me is one of the weaker ones of the early 60s and another cartoon that sees Woody past his best.If there was a best asset, it would have to be the music score. It is bouncy, energetic and very lushly orchestrated, not only synchronising and fitting with the action very well but enhancing it. The guard brings some occasional amusement to a mostly laughter-free cartoon.Voice acting is solid. Grace Stafford continues to prove why she was the best voice actor for the character and the one that understood him the most.However, Woody compared to his original manic personality is just too subdued and his material is too obvious and safe, one misses the manic energy and the risk taking. The Emperor is an unmemorable story-device, just there really to set up the story's conflict.Generally, the timing could have been sharper and the humour is primarily let down by that it is derivative of better and fresher humour in other Woody Woodpecker cartoons and also the lack of wit and consistent energy. There is occasional amusement with the guard but mostly the laughs are not enough and they are not particularly funny either. Plus the story is very over-familiar, very few surprises here, and the cartoon could have done with more variety.Just as problematic is the animation quality. Time and budget constraints shows in a lot of the animation, which is very rushed looking in the drawing and detail wise it's on the simplistic and careless side like many of Woody's cartoons from this period continuing through to the 60s.Overall, lacklustre. 4/10 Bethany Cox