jacobjohntaylor1
This is better then the first Sharknado movie. The first Sharknado movie is good. This is better. This has a great story line. It also has great acting. It also has great special effects. It is very scary. It not has good has Jaws. But this is still a good movie.
Wizard-8
It was perhaps inevitable with the success (financial, not critical) of the first "Sharknado" movie that we would get a sequel. While other production units might have made a quickie effort, in some aspects this sequel comes across better than the first movie - slightly. The shooting in various places in New York City do give the movie a better looking backdrop. And there are some amusing moments, particularly with the many cameos by various celebrities. However, in some aspects the movie is worse. This is most evident with the special effects. I know you can't expect multi million dollar special effects, but for some reason the special effects here look worse than those in the first movie. Also, the characters are not written to be particularly interesting, which is probably why most of the cast give lazy performances. (Though Vivica A. Fox and Judd Hirsch do put some life in their roles.) In the end, this movie is pretty much at the level of the first movie. If you liked the first movie, you'll probably like this sequel. If you didn't like the first movie, you know what you're in for.
jessegehrig
A horrible movie that's in no way meant to be taken seriously, just a good old goofball movie, but also I want my money back. I realize that Shark Tornado Part 2 is a made for TV movie and as such none of it's revenue comes from box office receipts so there is no way I could get my money back seeing as I never bought a ticket, but just the same, I would like to be reimbursed. Ten dollars, eight dollars, even five dollars would go a long way toward making me feel less like the Sci/Fi channel just sh*t on my chest. And now they have made a Shark Tornado Part 3, why? When did making the greatest movie ever stop becoming a goal for film makers? When did mediocrity become the benchmark for success? F*ck it, right?
djderka
Actually this was a fun film with quick pacing and some interesting CGI effects.However, the newscasters and the TV news shows saved this from being the run of the mill 'disaster' film.I cracked up when Al Roker and Matt really gave a great, great comic yet believable relief from an otherwise run of the mill disaster film. Add their special weather graphics and the movie is worth watching for just this part. Truly funny.IN ADDITIONThe move likes quips but could have been improved by a few tweaks.1)Kelly use her sky high red heels to kill one shark, it was forewarned in an early segment by her showing off her red heels to her co-host. What was needed was a slow motion CU shot of those red high heel coming down on to the shark's head and in slow motion with appropriate sound effect. We could almost hear the shark saying nooooooooo.2)The hero uses a chain saw in one scene to split a shark in half, lengthwise. I expected him to do the "chain saw dance" like in the chain saw movies, but he never did.3)Great scene in the pizza place where a shark comes in and the owner bats the shark into a pizza oven. I expected him to put up a sign that says: "NEW, Shark Pizza soon".4)In one scene the hero says to his friend, "we need a bigger bomb', she should have said, "yeah, like Heavens's Gate".There were some of these missed opportunities, but overall a fun, fast moving film with good homages to other similar movies. View the extra features for some inside info. Well directed and with great cameos. I enjoyed it.
AD
