hedeweg
Just poor.Some redeeming features were that the underwater CGI wasn't too bad. That said, they weren't very good either. Rapid cuts from the depth charge explosions were evidence of the lack of budget.This and other cuts could be forgiven if the storyline was compelling. Sadly, it wasn't.**Possible spoilers** The worst aspect of the movie, however, was the characterisation and acting. There wasn't a single sympathetic actor in the movie, certainly no one I'd want to identify with. The closest was the Navy officer and the German uBoat enemies, who at least looked and sounded convincing. The "hero" and ex-wife were particularly off-putting.After over two hours! I really didn't care if they lived or died. Not a good sign.
zif ofoz
Bad acting, bad script, bad bad bad everything.No - I couldn't make it to the end of this over two hour painful sh*t of a movie.After the first 30 to 40 minutes nothing could save it; nothing can save it. I cannot recall just where I stopped watching. But take my advice, please, skip this movie!You must be a desperate hard core sci-fi needy addict to make it through this - - story?Honestly just writing these words is boring me to tears - just like this movie did!
twidgetbubblehead
Being a former submarine sailor, I was intrigued by the title and cover. So, on a whim, it entered my shopping cart. After watching this garbage last night, I wish I had left it on the shelf at the store.They portray Lionfish as being locked up and sealed, yet there are features one would find on active museum ships that allow tourists below decks to keep them from doing touristy things.This film reeks of SyFy imagined theatrics. Poorly lit, even considering that it was filmed inside Lionfish, it shows people who, with two possible exceptions, are completely unfamiliar with submarine operations.Give this one a very wide berth. After watching this film, U-571 is actually believable!
harrisanthonypaul
SPOILER ALERT I like films about submarines, I like films about time travel, so I should have enjoyed this, sadly not.The holes in the script were as wide as the sea itself and the plot must have been written by a child because it just does not work.A Professor gets 'hung-up' about the mysteries surrounding a locked submarine after the disappearance of his Grandfather in 1943.He gets to board it in 2014 and WHAM! It goes on a mission (the submarine) without a crew or any visible means of navigation and 'pops up' in 1943, no explanation - the Government knows something but....After a few adventures and losing a few things they are rescued in 2014 when it apparently all on it's own just goes back there.Apparently the Government know all about everything because a modern day computer was found back in 1943.They used it to win the war! The modern computer still took years to develop and this 'transgression in time' did not change time that much really (YEAHH RIGHT)The submarine - in pretty battered shape was recovered in 2014.Where was it when the intrepid time travellers got on it a few days earlier? They obviously got on it under the sea, not at the dockside at all??LAME! A waste of 2 hours.
AD
