The Ambushers

The Ambushers

1967 "Matt Helm rides again! ... with the Ambushers on his back, and some fun on the side!"
The Ambushers
The Ambushers

The Ambushers

5.3 | 1h42m | NR | en | Action

When an experimental flying saucer crashes, secret agent Matt Helm has to bring back the secret weapons hidden on board.

View More
Rent / Buy
amazon
Buy from $14.99 Rent from $4.99
AD

WATCH FREEFOR 30 DAYS

All Prime Video
Cancel anytime

Watch Now
5.3 | 1h42m | NR | en | Action , Comedy | More Info
Released: December. 22,1967 | Released Producted By: Columbia Pictures , Meadway-Claude Productions Company Country: United States of America Budget: 0 Revenue: 0 Official Website:
Synopsis

When an experimental flying saucer crashes, secret agent Matt Helm has to bring back the secret weapons hidden on board.

...... View More
Stream Online

The movie is currently not available onine

Cast

Dean Martin , Senta Berger , Janice Rule

Director

Joseph C. Wright

Producted By

Columbia Pictures , Meadway-Claude Productions Company

AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

All Prime Video Movies and TV Shows. Cancel anytime.

Watch Now

Trailers & Images

Reviews

aimless-46 "The Ambushers" (1967) is the third film in Dean Martin's four-film "Matt Helm" franchise. It is significantly weaker than the other three and the only one which does not feature a song by the Steubenville Thrush, I don't think that omission impacted the film's relative quality. Martin was not in Sinatra's class as a singer or an actor but he was effortlessly likable and had some comedic talent. "The Ambushers" gets two stars instead of one because Janice Rule gives a solid performance in the face of what must have been a professionally embarrassing production for her. She looks extremely uncomfortable when she is not looking bored - I imagine her mind alternated between these two states. I can't imagine that the typical Irwin Allen production design motivated any of the cast.That said the film works quite well as a window into the pre-Woodstock era cultural vacuum. It throws a bevy of pretty young starlets onto the screen, none having the slightest dimensionality or being involved in anything remotely erotic. Sizzle-wise it's all form over substance.Rule (whose character physically looks a lot like Mrs. Peel) does provide a bit of erotic voltage in much the same classy detached way Diana Rigg did in a standard episode of "The Avengers". Working against all the females in the cast are some of the worst costume choices you can imagine. Apparently for a few days in 1967 dull finish boots that look to be made from shag carpet were trendy, unfortunately those days appear to have been the days when the wardrobe choices were made.The film had a villainess or at least the Francesca Madeiros character was intended to serve such a purpose. Francesca is played by a foreign actress named Senta Berger. She has orange skin, no waist, and wears large Christmas tree ornaments for earrings. It is rumored that Francesca's look served as the inspiration for the Oompa, Loompa characters in "Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory". The film features a flying saucer and I wonder if the original script called for Francesca to be from Venus, perhaps they forgot to communicate the changes to the wardrobe people. That might explain the incredible leaps of logic and obvious gaps in the development of her character. Berger's character is so garishly moronic that it elevates Rule's character or at least helps you appreciate the degree to which Rule was able to transcend this hopeless mess.Then again, what do I know? I'm only a child.
Uriah43 In this film the United States is working on an experimental spaceship that resembles a flying saucer. To pilot it they have enlisted the aid of an I.C.E. agent by the name of "Sheila Sommers" (Janice Rule). Upon takeoff everything is fine until it is commandeered by remote control across the border into Mexico. A week or so later Sheila is found wandering out of the jungle with no memory of what has happened to her other than her complete fear of men. It is at this point that Matt Helm (Dean Martin) is tasked with locating the flying saucer. So with Sheila under the illusion that Matt is her husband, they go to Acapulco to investigate. Anyway, like almost all Matt Helm films this one has plenty of action and scantily clad women to keep most men's interest for a good portion of the time. However, the movie seemed to drift from one scenario to another a bit too quickly, the dialogue was somewhat flat and everything seemed to lack cohesion. But both Dean Martin and Janice Rule performed in an adequate manner and while it could have possibly been written better I will go out on a limb and give it average rating.
oscar-35 *Spoiler/plot- 1967, The Ambushers, The baddies have built a working super secret flying saucer and plan on using it against the USA. Along with their new ray gun weapons, they plan to attack and win. Spy Matt Helm goes into action.*Special Stars- Dean Martin plays lead spy, Matt Helm, Senta Berger plays the lead love interest. Albert Salmi plays the baddie.*Theme- US spies come in many shapes and sizes.*Based on- Donald Hamilton's novel on Matt Helm, spy.*Trivia/location/goofs- Spoof of James Bond 007 spy films. Mostly shot in Mexico. The second entry in Martin's Matt Helm film series.*Emotion- A fun film for 'Dino' to relax in and be campy and funny. Light entertainment and humorous.
Simon Foster I'd like to know more about the people writing negative reviews of a movie like this: how old are they? were they even alive during the 60s? This movie is a product of a different age. It was a simpler time. You could get away with making movies that had this kind of production values, script and, yes - allusions to rape in an action-comedy notwithstanding - moral values (I'm not saying they're high, they're just an indicator of the time).Do you watch Charlie Chaplin or Laurel & Hardy and complain about the cinematography? You're watching a movie from the 60s guys - it's a time capsule. It can teach you about what life was like then, because at the time the Matt Helm movies were all completely acceptable and even successful.I dread to think how you lot would handle a 'Carry On' film - yet they were some of the most successful movies ever made in England. You'd probably brand them sexist, vulgar, childish and uninventive though...duh!