mkanatlar
So i was really uncertain about watching this after seeing all the reviews. When i finally got the balls to watch it at the very couple scenes i knew this wasn't jason bourne movie because it wasn't trying to tell the same story. People had the issue of comparing this to the trilogy but if you watch not as a part of jasons story but just accept that it's in the same universe. The scripting wasn't too bad and of course the acting was over the top with jeremy renner and rachel weisz. I think this movie was created to answer some questions about the universe and bring in another program and it's participants to explain the programs. The movie also sets us up to the upcoming events. The thing is this movie is so badly criticised but people looked at it with a wrong angle. Overall it serves the purpose of telling a beatiful story, answering some questions about the universe and setting us up for the upcoming events perfectly.
ib011f9545i
Due to being snowed in I have been watching all the Bourne films again on blu ray.
I like them all but I think the first 2 and this one are the best of the bunch.
Nothing much happened in the third film and the last one was the least interesting.
I honestly don't understand why people don't like this film and don't consider it part of the series.
It is written and directed by the person who wrote all the films,how can it be unofficial or a copy?
Of course I give no spoilers but this is a great spy film.
Renner is a better actor than Damon and Rachel Weisz is great in this.
I realise she might not need the money but she should act more.
If you like this sort of film and have been put off seeing this,give it a chance,I think you will be pleasantly surprised.
Miguel Neto
After the trilogy with starring Jason Bourne, the Bourne saga makes a change that many fans have left behind, The Bourne Legacy that would have another protagonist and would tell but the history of the Bourne universe, well the result was predicted, a medium film, The cast is good, Jeremy Renner, Rachel Weisz, Edward Norton and etc, but Matt Damon has always been the great protagonist of the saga, a film without it does not work, and this movie was the proof, even though I'm not a fan of the saga, it's It is undeniable that this The Bourne Legacy almost spoils the franchise, even though it is not a bad movie, but it was not necessary, Tony Gilroy's direction is medium, the script has several problems, weak dialogues, unnecessary moments, some action scenes until good , But nothing surprising, and the pace is slow, where it is a tiring, The Bourne Legacy is a medium movie, not bad enough, but should not have existed. Note 5.6
Art Vandelay
I haven't watched more than 5 minutes total of the three previous Bourne movies so I couldn't care less whether this one does or doesn't star Matt Damon or whether it continues the story properly. So no biases. I just watched this movie. I see ''Improved'' ''humans'' who have outlived their usefulness/become a menace. Different people are called in to shut them/the program down. Violent interactions result in many dead. There's even a brief bit about 2/3 of the way through where Ed Norton's character is watching tape of Renner's character being asked a series of questions. ''Is this a test?'' Renner's character asks. Renner is essential a Nexus-6 replicant. Ed Norton is a blade runner. Everything else is window dressing. I give it a 5 b/c it's a half-decent adrenaline rush, but 15 minutes after it's over you won't remember a thing. All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain.
AD
