WellBullyForYou This is indeed my favorite documentary. It's an intimate look at the life of the best president ever Teddy Roosevelt, his niece Eleanor Roosevelt, and her husband Franklin Roosevelt. I am biased, you see, so I will admit that my favorite bits are about teddy, and his war hero sons. Although Eleanor's accomplishments are incredible and I'm more impressed with her than I am with her husband Frank.If you only see one documentary this year, make it this one. For I can only describe it with one word: BULLY!And remember, speak softly and carry a big stick!

MartinHafer Although folks adore Ken Burns' series on the Civil War and it will no doubt be his most famous series, to me this one on the Roosevelts is as good. It ostensibly covers from the birth of Teddy until the death of Eleanor, it in fact emphasizes Franklin Roosevelt foremost. So, although Teddy was born decades before them, starting in the first episode, the show kept bouncing back and forth between the lives of Teddy and Eleanor and Franklin on the other. This did short-change Teddy's portion of the film just a tad but even still, it really delves into them all in depth unlike any other biography on any of the Roosevelts.Like other Burns series, this one consists of the roving camera over photos, lots of interviews as well as important celebrity impersonations of the particulars. Especially good among these was Meryl Streep's voicing for Eleanor, as it really sounded like her. In addition to all this, the show features quite a bit in the way of film footage and overall, they all create a gorgeous and loving look at these famous folks. Well worth seeing and exhaustive--clocking in at about 12 hours!

jljacobi I was slightly startled to find that while there were seven episodes, only two covered TR--a man that accomplished more in his lifetime than any other three humans I can think of, including FDR and Eleanor.There are numerous assumptions of espoused political and social attitudes being in fact correct, with lip service given to opposing views. The sections on domestic and social agendas drag on and on, especially in the FDR/Eleanor episodes. To the point where I started losing interest. I saw strong hints of political bias in many sections.All that said, though I've read several biographies of TR and FDR, I learned a great deal new about all three of the major players and the restored photography and video is great. But by devoting only two sections to TR, they glossed over some amazing parts of his story.

TheExpatriate700 The Roosevelts is an informative if flawed documentary series on one of the preeminent families of American history, tracing its exploits from Theodore Roosevelt to the presidency of FDR. It offers a wealth of detail for devotees of American history to chew on, but at times glosses over both context and the flaws of its subjects.The series' strongest point is the amount of information it marshals on its protagonists. All but the most devoted Roosevelt fans will learn something new here. The series discusses not only the presidencies of Theodore and Franklin, but also their family lives, their travels, and their struggles. Perhaps the most moving portion is the section dealing with FDR's struggle with polio, a subject that receives too little attention in most discussions of his character.The film also benefits from the wealth of primary sources that Ken Burns always brings to his series. We get the correspondence between the various Roosevelts, as well as commentary from other contemporary figures on their activities. All these sources are read by a talented voice cast that includes Meryl Streep and Ed Harris.However, the series also suffers from the weaknesses of many of Burns's films, including a lack of historical context and a tendency to gloss over uncomfortable subjects. As informative as the film is about Franklin, Eleanor, and Theodore, we get very little understanding of the times they lived in. For instance, the film does not discuss the causes of the Great Depression. Rather than an event with roots in previous economic policy, it comes across as a storm that just rose up out of the blue.More disconcerting, The Roosevelts often downplays the rougher edges of its subjects. For example, although it at times references Theodore Roosevelt's callousness towards the suffering caused by war, it tends to play down his often vociferous racism. It briefly mentions an incident where TR unjustly drummed a group of black soldiers, including former comrades of his, out of the service after false accusations of murder by racist whites, it largely ignores his role as a prominent defender of eugenics and racist immigration policies. (Interesting historical tidbit: TR attacked Margaret Sanger, who is much more commonly vilified for her eugenic sympathies, because he feared her birth control clinics would dampen the birth rate of the "racially pure.") The most egregious omission, however, is in the sixth episode, dealing with the early years of World War II. It devotes at most two minutes to discussing the internment of Japanese Americans, most of which focuses on Eleanor Roosevelt's ambivalence towards her husband's policy. To essentially gloss over a major tragedy in American history is simply unacceptable. Whatever one's feelings about the internment, the series should at least have looked at the policy discussions underlying Roosevelt's internment decision. An interview with a surviving internee would also have been a good addition.That said, the series does offset these omissions to a certain extent by featuring commentary from modern critics of the Roosevelts. George Will and Clay Jenkinson offer particularly incisive remarks. For all its flaws, The Roosevelts is still an informative series and could be useful for classroom use, especially in short segments.