vostf This is a really well researched script whose major quality is to empathise with the enemy, something that must have been quite impossible to picture for narrow-minded executives back in 2002. Unfortunately after 2008 we know it all, we have learnt all the various aspects, technical, sociological and political, of Jihad terrorism. The script does bring together all the elements pretty well, with an interesting lead, but that is not enough.First there is a rhythm issue. The story flows but there is no change in rhythm when we switch to - potentially - suspenseful or high-octane action scenes. This is all very low-key, in line with the main character (Don Cheadle also produced so it may be a reason here why main character and direction are somewhat overlapping) and doesn't help the movie to graduate into another dimension. Then, natural consequence of a loose rhythm, the audience is guessing ahead and the twists - and climax - are totally dissolved into the flow. In the end there is a strange feel that is not satisfactory about the blend of optimistic and pessimistic elements in the story. And really it is overly optimistic plot elements and totally downplayed pessimistic elements (well, they mostly rest on Don Cheadle's shoulders).I would recommend this movie for its detailed and clever script, and the sharp execution (kudos to the guys for shooting this in 48 days). Could have been sharper though, and that would have meant a totally different angle for the lead with, hem, less screen time, and relegating the Jihad characters in the dark background (too much visual empathy is counter-productive, empathy is perfectly sufficient thru Samir). Nice try, better vision next time.

Khaldoun Rayyan No one can deny that yes there is a bunch of terrorists who are Muslims, so I'm not going to attach the movie, just because it brings these bad muslims to light, since directing a movie about normal muslims will be very boring.But come on, the only good Muslim is an American ! Also there are some mistakes that have a huge impact on the image of Muslims like the explainiasion of "Takia"... In the film there is a scene were muslims were drinking alcohol, and they execuse there acts with a speech for prophet Mohammad saying that it's OK to lie, to create a deception to enemies... Well, this is not true, and "Takia" as well, is not a Sunni law, it's just in the Shia law. I'm mentioning that because such an idea will make us hypocrites.Hollywood loves to show that there is always a bloody spiritual war in the Middle East, I'm form the heart of the Middle East, Go and google "Jordan" it comes in the middle between Iraq and Israel... yeah imagine that.And it's totally peacefull place the only two war zones are in Israel and Iraq, there is no terrorists in any other country, I never saw a gun before and most of people here are the same, and this movie and some other movies are showing that we have daily explosions, and terrorists are living between us. Why I'm saying this, because this movie is giving the idea that terrorists are well-organized and smart ! Whatever you think, forget it, it's the most over-rated idea in the modern history. That's why I gave a low rating for this movie, because the director watched Fox News and CNN then he built the whole idea. Next time, try to at least visit the Middle East.

sddavis63 After a bit of a slow start and a somewhat convoluted story, "Traitor" manages to overcome those weaknesses and becomes a decent suspense flick about the planning of a major terrorist attack on the United States, and the fight by various members of the law enforcement/intelligence communities to prevent it. You have a tendency to want to dismiss this as just a right-wing anti-Muslim film; then you have a tendency to think of it as a left-wing anti-American film; then you realize that the story (since it makes you think of both) is actually pretty balanced. The excesses of both extreme Islam and American actions around the world are both noted, but the proper critique is also made of both types of excess, leading to the conclusion that the writers knew their stuff and understood the basic principles that undergird both Islam and the United States, and aren't afraid to criticize those who would twist either set of principles for their own ends.The movie revolves around Don Cheadle, who put on a great performance as Sadir, a Sudanese born American citizen. Sadir is a mysterious character. From the very beginning you question his loyalty - who is he really working for? What are his motives? In the end, you have the impression that while he's definitely working for one side over the other, he's much like the movie as a whole - he doesn't really support the tactics of either, and is really more committed to a higher cause of his own definition. The movie (as is common with these types of stories) includes a sometimes bewildering array of locations that makes it sometimes a bit hard to follow. There are scenes in Sudan, Yemen, Spain, France, the United Kingdom, the United States, Canada and Mexico - maybe even a couple more that I've forgotten! That might well be an accurate portrayal of how these plots are developed but it's a bit confusing as you're trying to follow the story.The plot is truly frightening. 50 Islamic extremists have been planted in the U.S. and are living normal lives (some married with children) waiting for their orders to put the plot into action. The plan is to simultaneously detonate bombs on 50 buses around the country to make the point that no one anywhere in the U.S. is safe. There's an interesting look at some of the strategies that might be used to communicate. As the point at which the plot is to be pulled off approaches, there's real suspense over whether it will be successful. Overall, this is a pretty good movie.

tedsltg This movie is a poor excuse for someone attempting to make a political statement void of true facts. Before you watch this movie, be aware of the agenda set forth as follows:1) America is a violent/evil country 2) All religions are violent 3) Islam is no more violent than all the othersYou will find the casting and dialog of this movie supports this "untrue" agenda fully. The Americans are portrayed as hot-tempered, angry, and prone to errors in judgment. The followers of Allah are portrayed as victims of American tyranny who are generally family oriented, spiritual, thoughtful and worthy of our sympathy. This movie is an insult to intelligence and true factual discovery. This movie erodes American patriotism if you tend to believe the message it puts forth.The Crusades was an act of self-defense from Muhammad's wave of bloodshed, violence and domination over a period of 1,000 years (with significant conquests starting in 641ad to 1683ad) and the terror continues to the present day. This movie suggests a contrary theory to this fact but fails to support it's claim.Western civilization knows the Golden Rule and assumes that all should abide by it. The truth is: they don't. No amount of Hollywood propaganda will change that fact. To Islam, Hollywood are infidels (not worthy to live). I would rather see a political movie that is validly realistic and not idealistically "twisted" and void of factual credence.