aljn-87890 Some of you if you are Bible haters or Christ haters will hate this. The Bible clearly shows that the continents were connected until about 4500 years ago! It also states that men built cities close to 6000 years ago. Much recent archaeology uncovers observable evidence of mankind at that time building things that even today would be very difficult to build- and these on every continent! this flies in the face of "evolution". Secular "scientists" say that only "ancient aliens" could be the source of this observable evidence. Sadly much of so called "scientific evidence" is only (as the Bible says) "false scientific evidence" or "false knowledge"--because it is based on many layers of assumptions,imaginings, falsehoods etc.---rather than on observable evidence. The global "flood" with massive volcanic activity and the foundations of the earth being shaken wiped out and/or covered the civilizations that had been!!

grnlifesvr I am a scientist with nearly 50 years of research on many of the subjects covered in this show. I have seen most of the episodes, but not all. I have read all the reviews here as of Feb. 2015. From what I can tell I have done far more work on much of the subject matter than all the other reviewers here put together. Though, I must say many of the reviewers who talk as if they know all about the subject matter don't indicate having done any of their own research whatsoever, so it's difficult to say for sure.I would urge anyone interested to keep an open mind while watching this show. The host presents his opinions and explains why he has them. That is all. He examines items that would help prove some of his opinions to be correct and declares them to be unrelated or even a hoax if his examination and research indicate such. I have done extensive checking on much of the science he presents, and have found it to be sound. That doesn't mean I come to the same conclusion on all of it, just that the science is sound as best I can tell within the parameters of a TV show.I find most of the criticisms in the reviews here to be on much shakier factual and scientific ground than most of the information in the show. I find it concerning when people exhibit the level of emotion that those here criticizing the show. The amount of "scientific facts" that were once accepted by scientists that are now known to be incorrect is staggering, just as the number of current known scientific facts that were once vigorously attacked by many scientists. If you are open minded and willing to do a bit of research yourself, I believe you will most likely enjoy this show as I have.

Bugnbrian I really enjoy this show. It may not be real history but it is closer than many other History Channel programs and since lineups are dictated by ratings we can blame ourselves for that. Even the haters are obviously viewers as well. What if we watch it for what I think the producers intended, entertainment?I have lived in lots of small towns and rural areas around the eastern parts of the USA and have learned that every community has it's very own interesting history and past full of exciting events. Within so many of those histories lies a layer or section that has questionable conclusions, or parts that have not achieved consensus even after decades. This show has been a wonderful venue for people to learn about interesting legends, histories, and mysteries of places they may never have been to or even heard of otherwise.I don't believe I have ever heard the show's host claim that he has presented evidence proving anything one way or another. I have heard him say that either the presence or lack of some specific evidence warrants asking more questions or pursuing further investigations. He does that while also telling a story or legend many of us know something about while many more of us may never have had the opportunity to ever know about. Finally, I think we must all honestly admit, even if the program or it's host does have an agenda, it is far more innocent than the manipulative agenda most of America's 24hr news agencies practice. So why are so many being so hostile about a small time cable TV show?

pendek-orang i just started watching this show because it is being made available by my satellite TV provider on a temporary basis. i was appalled by "forensic geologist" Scott Wolter. He is reckless and irresponsible. I do like most of the subjects picked for his flawed analyses because i have an interest in these anomalies myself. I reject most all of his conclusions, however. Once this POS show is no longer available for free by my satellite provider, I won't miss it, nor will I ever be induced to upgrade my TV package so that I can get it again. On the positive side, I do learn more about each of his chosen anomalies with each show, and for that I'm appreciative. I wish he'd get off of that Knights Templar obsession of his, though.