tommy5677
Alas, I hated it. Well, not entirely but mostly. I blame a lot of it's shortcomings on direction and acting. One of the ways I gauge an actors ability is by how well they cry. Eric Dean actually pulled it off quite well so I'll be watching for him . He is the most talented of the entire lot. I found this movie long and boring. James McCabe, though sizzlingly hot in a Ken Berry sort of way,," failed to convince me of anything. Also, there is not enough intimacy here. I would have appreciated a lot more kissing, touching, holding, cuddling, and maybe a tasteful sex scene. None of it happened. Don't waste your time.
raffycoraleslopez
I was watching some programs in the internet when my friend told me to watch Arizona Sky its about two best friends keeping mutual understanding for each other within their own self. I watched it and it made me teared for some scenes specially during the conversations. I love the way Eric portrayed the anxiety cases and how seeing James McCabe change everything. I was really touched with that. I immediately searched for the characters in Facebook but cant find James McCabe., but still the film is so touching. With the locations (setting), the characters emotional connections. Ilove the scene where Kyle's aunt voiced out what she knows about Kyle. I wanted it cause real people who knows us means they really love us., :) a million thumbs up to this Arizona Sky., How I wish this could be premiered on big screens in the Philippines., This will be a block baster to LGBT in the country.
katchaya-1
I watch a lot of independent films.I can be very very forgiving. But this is possibly the poorest product i have seen in a long time.The script is soooooooo bad. The angst the teenagers feel is so badly manufactured. They are unhappy, we get hints about parental abuse and family problems. Oh and then there is that gay thing. They are going to be separated when one moves away. I could buy into that part. But cut to years later and our character who has moved, has more angst now than ever. He is a miserable film producer. Maybe he was making this film, and knew how bad it was going to be so he had something to model on.The acting is atrocious but with a script like this i don't see how better acting could have helped it. Then there is the straight friend that seems to me to be a better option than the one he left behind in the little town in AZ. There is NO CHEMISTRY between the two actors who are supposed to be in love with one another. They have nothing in common. I would rather watch grass grow than this piece of drek. There is just no possible way that this could be believable. Try something else , there is so much better out there.
mrmalcolmu
I made the mistake of not screening for Jeffery London movies before adding this to my NetFlix queue. I'd rented "Before Darkness Falls" months ago. It's so bad it's not even listed in his filmography, but he just doesn't get any better with successive movies. The film concepts are all somewhat interesting, but the plots, dialogue, and acting are so bad that my husband made me fast forward through the rest of "Arizona Sky" after the first scene. How can these two 16 year old boys go camping without immediately falling on top of each other? No liquor, no pot, no sex!?! Are they Mormons?! How about putting some thought into how real people act in certain situations? At the very least they would have discussed their fears about being out alone together at the start of the scene instead of after fifteen minutes of pointless yakking. If we wanted to see "real" real life we could just listen to our families. That last statement probably gives London the excuse to say that this is what he's trying to achieve, but sorry: I don't want to see that on screen. At least my mother-in-law can act. There are worse gay movies than London's, however. Try "Windy City Incident" (better yet, don't: it's truly horrible).
AD
