xufo
It's just incredible! Until now I couldn't even imagine that it's at all possible to make such incredibly bad movie. It's even hard to tell what is the worst part of it. Acting? Story line? Characters? Special effects? Camera work? Whatever you pick it's all bad. First, let's start with the story line. Well, it's weak and predictable. Not only it's weak and lacks of logic but also literally ridden with overused clichés. Another group of young people goes to another abandoned building, splits there and dies one by one. Characters are dull and acting looks quite unnatural. They even die in silly and impossible ways. Special effects are definitely not making this movie any better. They could have been OK for a one from the 60s or, maybe, 70s, but definitely not OK for a movie filmed in 2015, no matter how low the budget was. As for the horror component (finally, it's a horror movie, right?) there's nothing scary here. You won't find neither tension buildup nor even cheap jump-scares. Nope. Nothing except dimly lit corridors and empty rooms. Making long story short: don't waste your time.
faxirgulee
A movie made by some really amateur guy, played by a dozen amateur ugly young people, watching it is losing time. No one of the people in this movie is an actress and they never will be one. A movie made by some really amateur guy, played by a dozen amateur ugly young people, watching it is losing time. No one of the people in this movie is an actress and they never will be one. A movie made by some really amateur guy, played by a dozen amateur ugly young people, watching it is losing time. No one of the people in this movie is an actress and they never will be one. A movie made by some really amateur guy, played by a dozen amateur ugly young people, watching it is losing time. No one of the people in this movie is an actress and they never will be one.
Flow
Overused! Cheap! Classic horror moves! No surprises!It sure was a bad building, in a bad story, provided by a bad script, directed bad and acted the same. Some actors did better than others, probably those who believed they will make it big eventually and this is their rock bottom start. The extremely small budget made a huge impact sadly, I've seen better camera work and CGI in the 80s movies, the dialogue was as cheesy as possible and the ending surely did not help.It was just another horror for me, nothing more. I love this genre, I watch underground such productions in order to put a honest, of course, personal review on IMDb and help out, either warn about the movie, or recommend it. This one is definitely a pass!Bad Building trapped inside a bad movie. So don't make a bad night out of it!Cheers!
Bloodmarsh Krackoon
So, there's been a nice little trend going on in the horror genre the last few years - and by 'nice,' I mean crap. The trend: a group of ghost hunter's enter (insert building of your choice here) to increase their ratings and save their TV show.Not only do we have to watch really bad reality TV, but now we have to watch really bad horror movies about really bad reality TV. I mean, what genius thought of this one? 'Bad Building' has it all - bad acting, bad lighting, bad audio, bad special effects, just all around bad. Random Ramblings of a Madman: 'Bad Building' is one of those horror films so bad, that it doesn't even qualify for 'worst movie I've ever seen,' because it can't even pull off the humor necessary for such an awesome accomplishment.
AD
