nightroses I've watched this animated film of 1992. It's of low quality compared to previous animated Beauty and the Beast films made by Disney and Childrens Fairytale Collection. There has been a number of Beauty and the Beast animations found under Golden Films and Animated Classics. This wasn't the best animated version of the story I've ever seen. The music was a little sickly and slow. The beginning was introducing us to Beauty and the Beast doing a waltz. There are few complaints though. One is that the sisters of Beauty are horrible and ugly, and it appeared like a Cinderella film. In the original fairytale, the sisters of Beauty were not ugly or wicked. They were just interested in clothes and jewels. Beauty's character is unrealistic. She shares the same genes as her ugly rude sisters but is ultra kind, charitable and prefers roses to pretty dresses. She happens to be the most beautiful and blonde, while her sisters are dark. She's got two brothers, who are kind. Father is supposed to be kind because he sounds like a bumbling old man but he cared more about his lost cargo than of the lives of men working on the ship. The introduction to a sinister fairy was a twist, and there was also the kind Clara spirit. I found that the clothes of the characters come from different eras, and it was hard to pinpoint exactly what century they're from. The artists of the film didn't know the history of clothes. Other than my digs, it was a nice colourful film. By the way there was no bad colour stain on the whole film as another IMDB user said in their review so it must've been that person's old VHS. They need to get a new one.

Scott Carl Wild I'm going to get this out of the way first. Old Man is the best thing about this movie. Just the attitude and stupidity he has has gotten him to become a cult classic character. Other than that, the movie was MEH. Beauty was just as dumb as her father, the two sisters, I wish could get karma back to them for being so mean, and the brothers are, well,just there. Beast is a joke, and Clara could care less about what she does. The animation is cheap, and some of the acting feels like the actors could give two s**ts. But, personally, if it wasn't for Old Man, I would have given this a much lower rating than it has, maybe like a four or three. And on a side note, this movie ain't an exact ripoff of Disney's Beauty and the Beast, but it is definitely a cheap cash in.

elfmaiden65 I admit, I am a sucker for just about anything animated, especially if it happens to be based on a fairy tale. This movie, for all its technical failings has a charm unto itself. Sure its a simple and childish interpretation, but that is what its supposed to be. I honestly really liked the addition of the character Clara. She was really a kick. I know this was made for small children, but I thought that the design for the beast was more goofy than scary. They could have tried a little harder on that. Another thing that bothers me about a good chunk of the movies released by Good Times ent. is the soundtrack. It's distracting to have familiar classical music constantly playing in the background. This is one of the better Good Times films, and worth a watch for your little ones (or if you're an animation junkie like with an appreciation for the lower budgeted productions).

luckylaperlas This movie is generic rubbish. You know those ridiculous Japanese low-budget cartoons of the 80's where there was almost no animation, just a bunch of still prints moving across a background? The ones where the character's lower jaw just bobbed up and down when they spoke? Well this movie is not far removed from them. And it was made in 1992? They're kidding, right? You'd have to be stunningly demented to call this movie stunningly charming. Oh, and watch out for the long coffee-like stain on the left of the screen visible throughout the entire movie. It's not on your monitor, it's in the film. No, I'm not joking. Do yourself a favor and don't waste your time with this pauper's version of the classic.