abevan1980
I completely agree with everything said in the negative reviews above (whether written by Colombians or not). Did Tackleberry direct all the action scenes ? Unlike some other American films, I was impressed they were able to spell Colombia properly in the title (check out Steven Segal's Above the Law), that's what my 1/10 star was for. This is one of those ridiculous films you put on in the background when you have your mates over for a few snacks/drinks. No need to have the sound on, you can work it all out from every 3rd or 4th scene. I found the scene where the guy is underwater swimming through the pipe quite amusing, what are all those weeds in there? Enjoy it if you can... I didn't.
gustavomarin
What a great film... it is full off valuable facts plus the quality of the production is just stunning!To summarise a few of the best facts and contributions of this film in my life: - A blind guy with a digital camera produces a better footage that this people. - All the north American girls are hot (like bimbos) - All the north American guys are ripped (specially the soldiers) - All the south Americans are fat, sweaty and wear hats. - Bogota is a hot and humid city (did not know that) - Colombia's conflict could be ended using between 3 to 5 soldiers (americans of course)ARE YOU F#@#$# SERIOUS... I would like to be able to give negative points in IMDb!
Andy Abi Haydar
I don't get this movie, nor its story. Come to think of it, neither the ending.It discusses how a group of Navy SEALs, sent by the US government, go to the guerrilla-invaded Colombia on a recon mission that goes wrong.The story is not all realistic or believable. The elements just don't fit together. A bunch of SEALs go into a country filled with enemy soldiers ALONE? Certainly a suicide mission; recon or not.The producers did not do a good job in hiring the actors; the acting was terrible! I know, I know, Joe Manganiello is well-built for a soldier and in a way seems like a perfect pick, but he's more of an actor that should star in comedies and not war movies. Ken Anderson? Seriously? Anyone who watched the movie will agree when I say that this dude has no idea what acting is.It had potential to be a *good* movie, but it failed, big time.I don't see a reason why you should watch this movie. It doesn't have anything enjoyable. But, if you like shooting randomly and all that stuff; why not?
hokinizeu
I watched this movie with the first two Behind enemy lines in mind. I was so wrong! There is no good actors/actress in this movie. You can tell it was a low budget movie with terrible plot lines that don't make sense. Some of the lines were so cheesy. It just makes you laugh and think you can direct better than how this movie was made. It makes you think it was the director's first movie, even then it's horrible. He's a director for crying out loud. You have to make sense in some scenes. You have to impress the watchers via something but just about everything seemed unnaturally filmed etc... I will never watch this movie again nor would I recommend it to anyone.
AD
