robertebritt Well, what can you say about this that hasn't been said already? I enjoyed it! That's different, huh? As said before this is a micro-budget zombie film made with a no name cast. okay, maybe Alexis Texas is a name somewhere, but probably not really. I have to give kudos to people pursuing their passions and actually getting a film made and on IMDb and streaming through Netflix is an accomplishment.The movie was corny and porny. The plot was weak and rehashed, but if you watch it just for the ridiculous "sex" scenes and fantasy scenes, plus add the squirting bright red blood...well, have a few drinks or hallucinogenics and it's a fun watch. If you are a fan of Ed Wood you'll probably like Bloodlust Zombies.Oh and a shout out to the temp, Lauren Todd. Nice work. you added some sincere laughs which I think were actually supposed to be funny.

Jason Miller What to say, what to say. Well, first off, the acting sucks more than a fire engine pumphouse. The lighting needs to be seriously evaluated. The special effects are worse than in that three dollar video game for your Nintendo DS you bought last year. The scenes jump around sporadically and it is extremely hard to tell what is going on. The main character, Alexis Texas, has so little screen time (even though it's both really good and really bad), you would not even think she was the main character. The storyline has a fair idea and a mild approach to the setting.A few good points: 1.) Alexis Texas is super super hot. A few exotic scenes are displayed with her, likely for rating purposes, that are actually quite humorous. She is also a total bad-@$$ when fighting zombies with an ax. 2.) The hilariousness of it all. The special effects are entirely worthless yet so comical you cannot help but laugh at them. There are parts that make you laugh your @$$ off. I myself was busting out ROTFLOL, if you catch my drift. The parts that were meant to be funny sucked so much they caught a giggle. The scenes without humour actually ended up being funny.But then it suddenly ends. Classic, cheesy ending with an Alfred Hitchcock twist (kind like "The Birds). A rate it 10 out of 10 just because it made me laugh and tried hard to fail (succeeding to fail means failing at failing to succeed to fail?) So yeah. Very short, very pointless, very VERY low budget. Go watch if you need dumb humour and are 18+ years old. Lots of Tig Ol' Bitties. (There's a reason Alexis Texas is a pr0n star.)

Slowblivion Alright before I get into the various things that are wrong in this video... I emphasize video... I think the only thing that was a positive is Lauren Todd. (it wasn't a big positive but for not having any credits to her name, i thought she was kind of funny and do hope to see her in more films) She played the temp in case you don't know the name. With that said, wow... trash. It's a cheap movie which is a fact that is abundantly clear given the security control room is clearly also an editing suite. (you can see the multichannel sound board and an AVID keyboard as well as what looks like a waveform or vectorscope... not entirely sure which) This is supposed to be a high tech/high security facility for a group that develops chemical weapons for the military, so why are all the rooms painted like a fun house? One scene contains a red wall, a blue wall, a yellow wall and a white wall. The acting is bad but if you look closely, you may understand why they all looked absolutely lost through the whole film. The director, Dan Lantz, was also an actor, also the writer, also the director of photography and producer. It's pretty clear to me that it's hard to give actors the attention needed to get decent performances when you're time is split between 5 different jobs. I wouldn't be surprised if there are other jobs he's not credited for that he was doing. Is that an excuse? no, but it explains a lot. Large sections of the film is chattering between characters who reveal nothing and progress the story in no way at all. (temp talking to the sex hound guy) (alexis Texas talking to the boss lady)... In fact, no one seems all that worried about the impending death that awaits them so you don't ever feel bad when they die and when they don't, you're upset. I get that this is supposed to be jokey and fun but the jokes fall to pieces really quick. Lighting is bad, the music is ridiculous, editing is awful. The nudity is tasteless and forced in so much that it makes you wonder why the director/writer/actor/director of photography etc didn't just skip the story and have a 20 minute video of girls running around topless. (I guess one has to justify the nudity with story) The writing is bad enough it seems like it was written as the film was going with only a loose premise holding it all together. If movies are made with the idea that it will probably be bad one has to beg the question, why are you making it at all? And if you're going to make a "zombie" movie, they have to be zombies, not mutants. So in the credits, don't list the cast as ZOMBIES/MUTANTS.... I give it 2, 1 because it's the lowest I can go, and the second because I think Lauren Todd was alright....

andresfp_55 Just created an account to say: (sorry about the poor review) This movie is crap. This is the kind of movie that you want to see because is so awful that is funny to see how they constantly fail in various attempts to copy some great movies scenes, some classic scenes, the WHOLE acting and the camera angles and movements. Finally i decided this movie worth to watch because this will perfectly teach you what is am horrible horrible (x100) movie in all aspects... (sorry about my poor English) ;) (i don't know about the director but i really hope this is his first movie because is a big and heavy learned from my fail... and if that phrase works he will turn 180 degrees in his work....