Dalbert Pringle When it comes to riotously insane, 1980's cinema - You've really gotta see Terry Giliam's "Brazil" for yourself to actually believe it. You really do.This off-the-wall, cinematic roller-coaster ride into a retro-future is, without question, all about a "world-gone-mad" where endless bureaucracy has, literally, buried man, neck-deep, in a technological mess.The hilariously convoluted script of "Brazil" was clearly written (back in 1985) with some surprising foresight - As its story still retains its relevancy in these times of technological over-load that we find ourselves living in at present.Visually quite impressive - "Brazil" may not appeal to everyone's tastes - But, if nothing else - It is certainly a very unique movie-experience that is bound to draw the viewer into its nightmare world in no time flat.

eagandersongil The bureaucracy applied to the fiction that conveys the real, how wrong a science fiction movie that has as its theme the most boring thing in the world could go wrong? Many, did not give, quite the contrary, he can criticize at the same time that bothers and enchants for his wealth of detail and his ironic black humor completely enthralling. Terry Gilliam participated in the script of the film, which is said to be confused in his actions, but he is linear and despite creating a dystopian future austadoramente verosimílimo and incredible, where it shows the totality of a state on the market and its Society, sunk in bureaucracy, damaging public service, inhibiting private initiative, turning servers into numbers, demanding goals without working conditions, and living the paranoia of a terrorist attack, its future is appalling and annoying. - Who said the future will be fun? Within this universe we have Sam Lowry (Jonathan Pryce), a public servant who after falling in love with a woman turns out to be confused with a state enemy, Terry comes from month payton, so his humor is black, funny, rough and critical and completely Absurd, may even be swollen, but it is pleasant. Terry's criticism of the totality of the perfect state, for it shows the difficulty of small acts, beyond the search for love, lose of indignity amid state control, the absurd search for beauty, and control. With a gray photograph reminiscent of Blade Runner, he is almost sensuous in his cyberpunk aesthetic mixed with the ordinary, with a wealth of incredible detail reminiscent of "2001- A Space Odyssey" you notice the care of Terry and his team in Every minute of the movie, alias, the art direction of this film is something completely unbelievable, its soundtrack is also touching, and too much house with the movie, its rhythm talks and marries the screen. The performances in general I think weak, Jonathan Pryce even has its moments but does not get to excite Kim Greist is pessima and of niro does not pass feeling some, although its character is great. "Brazil" can be fat, and you will feel the time, but admire the beauty of your art direction and contemplate a complete and sensational criticism putting itself as one of the best black humor movies I have ever seen in my life.

ElMaruecan82 "Brazil" has the title, the music and the creativity upon which masterpieces are made on, but it's like an irrepressible and suffocating twirling mass of the same paperwork that poison people's lives have taken over the plot, and it's only within its core that you can understand why this is such a great movie. But a better editing would have befitted such an ambitious plot, a pity Gilliam; the artist triumphed over the director. This is an artsy film with no direction.The last Gilliam film I watched was "The Fisher King" and it suffered the same syndrome. I enjoyed it but the story was never as brilliant and soul-penetrating as in the quieter and more realistic parts. It could have done without the Red Dragon hallucinations and even that Holy Grail subplot. But what Gilliams' movies say about him is that he has a sort of childlike obsession with "conflict" as something that can only be exposed through some big-scale extravaganza fights with high-tech effects and so forth, and that's exactly what almost ruined my enjoyment of "Brazil". The film is like a big party you're invited to, you enjoy yourself, you have fun, but because of two or three incidents, you're not sure you want to live the same experience again. Now, there's no doubt that the film is brilliant and it's a great satire against the overwhelming effect of bureaucracy and even technology (although it is displayed in a retro-futuristic way), we are all literate enough to get all the Orwellian vibes from the film, and even now, I can't imagine the hell of bureaucracy without that Brazilian tempo working in my mind. So, no one who criticized "Brazil" missed the point. But it's like Gilliam wants so much to emphasize the feeling of sheer confusion induced by the whole (mis)adventure that instead of making the story confusing by maintaining a solid plinth to the narrative, he made the experience of following the film, confusing as well. At one moment, you see Sam trying to find a woman, which in the actual setting is Herculean enough a task, and another moment, he's a warrior fighting a giant Samurai. I love some artistic licenses, but talk about overkill. Gilliam had a good story at hands but he goes for sensationalism while he had enough material to design something thrilling in the content, without going for such hyperbolic action sequences. The result is uneven and infuriating. When you trust your material, you don't need some pseudo psychedelic fights, chase sequences or other wall-crashing moments, action isn't always to be treated literally. Yes, this is a world that takes some monster Godzilla-like size, but I don't care that Gilliam wanted to pay homage to Kurosawa with the Samurai-figure, just make a tribute to "Ikiru" which was a real movie about bureaucracy, and it'll be fine. The same goes with the Brazilian escapist moments, first it's poetic and dreamlike, but they are so redundant that you don't know which story you're supposed to follow in the end. It says a lot about Gilliam and his tendency to make polarizing movies when they're no need for it. Indeed, we need a story, you can't make the cleverest satire without trying to confuse the audience but, it's like some suicidal impulse that is somewhat more fascinating than the film's content. I tried to watch "Brazil" twice, the first time, I fell asleep, the second, I turned it off because I was tired of trying to figure out what point he wanted to make with this or that scene. Now. I finally made it till the end, and while I acknowledge that there was some potential in this film and some scenes are nothing short but masterpieces: the Metropolis-like shots, any scene with Katharine Helmond and Ian Holm, and some brilliant little touches like the duct on the dog's poo-hole, this is still one of the cases where the final cut should've been shorter. The element that is constantly praised by the fans is the critics against bureaucracy, well, that makes the whole fights and chases quite useless, and what about the heart of the story: Sam? Sam Lowry, played by Jonathan Pryce, was a great character, the perfect straight man to this tragicomedy. Why not making him someone who really wants to go to Brazil? Why not creating some deeper connection with the woman, not just "curiosity"? How about the Harry Tuttle guy? The film had plenty of directions to take, but it just makes his main protagonist wander in a dystopian universe, encountering the most eccentric characters, and punctuate the film with a few actions sequences and weird nightmarish intrusions.I love the way Siskel described the movie: "It beautifully beats to death one point" He nails it. This is the film the expressions "insisting upon itself" was invented for, and even the whole bureaucracy thing is a bit overrated. I don't know if this review will be useful for anyone, but if I want a great and short satire about bureaucracy, I watch "The Place That Sends You Mad" segment from "The Twelve Tasks of Asterix". Now, that's perhaps the best critic against bureaucracy ever made, and it didn't need any special effects or fight sequences.As for "Brazil", Gilliam is one hell of a director and writer, but you know, there's a reason why they also give Oscars for "editing". As I said for another Gilliam's film, it's like the directing's style stealing the story's thunder.

Charlie Doble Brazil is not a film for everybody. Upon its initial release many critics hated it, and it didn't do very well financially. I've read plenty of the reviews for the film and a lot of the issues they had are perfectly understandable. The dream sequences do get slightly tedious and don't develop the story, the action sequences aren't that great and it is a rather long film (two hours and thirteen minutes). I agree wholeheartedly that the film has problems. So why is it my favourite film of all time? Well, I think it has to do with preferences, like most movies. I love dark comedy and surreal imagery. I also really like satire and find it to be extremely funny (when its done right). So Brazil seems like the perfect film for me. Have you ever seen a movie that seems like it was tailor made for you? Well, that's Brazil for me. The film is directed brilliantly by Terry Gilliam, and stars Jonathan Pryce, Robert DeNiro, Bob Hoskins and an abundance of other actors and actresses. Every single person does a brilliant job, and I can't think of a single person who's bad in it. The set design is absolutely incredible. The matte paintings and sets look great, and really bring the world of Brazil to life. The film also has one of the most underrated scores of all time, by Michael Kamen. The music used in the office near the start has been used in countless other movies and movie trailers. The cinematography is also beautiful. The film has, in my opinion, one of the greatest endings of all time. It shows you your happy ending and then completely destroys it right in front of you. Its a great twist ending.As for flaws, there are a few. Most of them I talked about near the start of the review, but there is another one I want to talk about. The editing is sometimes slightly off and it feels like they end scenes too early, or chopped some of the endings of scenes off to save time (that flaw is fairly minor and not many people will notice it). Despite its flaws, Brazil is still my favourite movie of all time and always will be. Sure, its got problems, but I think its better that way. Nothing is perfect no matter how much you want it to be, and if there is (supposedly) nothing wrong with a film, or book or any type of art, it makes it seem less human, and in being perfect makes you appreciate it less. That's my take on it anyway.