sinerama I prefer to watch a sexy horror movie than a low budget gorefest. Therefore I enjoyed this film. I don't want to give away the whole plot but it is more than just your typical serial killer type tale. It is the kind of film I have been looking for for a long time and thought would not exist. Sexy Eurpoean ladies, extreme situations, stylish, great music from Frank Cossack. Maybe it is slow in places but its still worth the purchase (nice cover too). Imaginative and very erotic....I can think of no other film like this for style and content. If you are looking for a bloody gorefest then go somewhere else I say....but appreciate that this is in a league of its own.

slake09 Let's start off with the idea that you are going to see some good acting, great sets, awesome special effects or other virtues of a serious film. You're not, and you knew it as soon as you saw the box this movie came in, so let's not pretend.Anyone who watched this past the credits knew exactly what it was about - there went your right to criticize it for the bad acting. Anyone who watched it to the end lost the right to criticize it for the lack of plot, special effects or great sets; after the first five minutes you know without the slightest shred of a doubt that you're not going to see those things. If you watched it to the end, then you liked it. Peddle your guilt elsewhere.The whole Fantom Kiler series is an excuse to show good looking women in states of nudity and erotic distress. I would have to say the distress is erotic because how many women would writhe fetchingly on the hood of a car while a knife-wielding murderer poses menacingly over them? I myself wouldn't do it. Unless, of course, the murderer was a hot, naked Polish chick like those in the movie, oiled up and so forth. Then I might be persuaded to writhe a little bit.So let's enumerate the qualities that make this film good for it's intended audience, the things you should expect from a movie in this genre.Nudity? Yep, lots of it. Not as much as Fantom Kiler 1, but definitely enough to put it solidly in the "watch this for the naked girls if nothing else" category.Bad acting? Sure enough. Nobody is even trying very hard to act, and that's as it should be. Who pays any attention to the acting when there are hot, naked Polish chicks tied to ladders? If you are attempting to critique the acting at that point, only a good bludgeoning will straighten you out.Humor? It's OK. Again, not as much as in Fantom Kiler 1. Perhaps the director's stash ran a little low and he wasn't feeling as witty this time around. The situations themselves are humorous, though, if you are capable of seeing it.Attractive girls in distress? Oh, yeah. Plenty of it, too. Not that the distress is real, or can even be construed to be real. The girls are just too smilingly provocative about their distress. They enjoy it so much and so often that you want to share it with them a little.Most of the girls from Fantom Kiler 1 are here, reprising much the same roles, in much the same "I walk around oiled up, in skimpy clothes, and will take them off at the slightest excuse" manner. I respect them for their dedication to taking off their clothes. They will remove clothing for the most insubstantial reason, a quality I admire greatly. When they aren't naked, they are in outfits so skimpy their very existence is a tribute to the female form.In conclusion, I salute Trevor Barley/Roman Nowicki for his ability to get hot girls to squirm around naked on the hoods of cars. The man is an unacknowledged genius and should receive some kind of award for his groundbreaking work in the field.

douglasjarry Film fans have struggled long and hard to try and make a case for Jess Franco Dario Argento Jose Laraz et al as misunderstood genii, struggling in the lower depths of cinema crafting unrecognized and unsung masterpieces . Trevor Barley has blown the gaff with his 'Fantom Kiler' series showing that the only important quality that any of these giallos-euro shockers have for their fans is the visceral thrill of seeing attractive and generally naked women sliced and diced . TB has opted for the graphic approach eschewing the atmosphere plot suspense and other attempts at providing entertainment employed by his role models. Given the apparent budget I'm sure he has made some money from his efforts, hopefully enough to pay his legal fees if the worthies from the Office of Trading Standards or the Police notice him and enquire why he has not submitted his films to the British Film and Video Classification procedures required by all films distributed in the UK.

mayflower I just got Fantom Kiler 2 for christmas. I've read that it should be rather extreme and very sick. "YES, that's just what I need", I thought to myself. Well, first of all this "movie" is about the worst piece of crap, I have ever seen and I've seen a lot of it (crap, that is). It's not EXTREME in any way, it's just extremely boring and badly made. Somewhere in the movie i think there's a plot of some kind, but when it all comes down to it, it's just breasts and killing hookers. There are a lot of breasts and shots of masturbation, but when it comes to the murder scenes, it just gets too dumb. I won't even get into the murder scenes, because they are so laughable badly made, that i can't find the words to describe it. Most of the movie is shot on indoor sets, that would have made Ed Wood laugh his ass off. And on top of it all, the acting must be the worst I've seen in years and I don't know what the directors job has been on this no-budget-flick, because he certainly haven't been directing.A few good nude scenes, but the rest is so z-grade that I got a headache watching it. If this is the future of no-budget filmmaking, then count me out. I'll wait for the next from Timo Rose, Olaf Ittenbach and Andreas Schnass instead. They do offer some kind of quality, this s*** absolutely doesn't-In short: Stay away! Go watch paint dry instead.