tavm Having been on an Our Gang kick again, I found out that YouTube has a series of Five Little Peppers movies that featured Tommy Bond and Edith Fellows-who had previously appeared in a couple of the Little Rascals shorts: Birthday Blues and Mush and Milk which Bond also was in. It's Fellows who's the main star here as the oldest of the siblings who takes care of the house when the widowed mom is off at work. Bond is far from his bully Butch character in OG that he still occasionally portrayed during this period which is refreshing to see. While this was mainly a drama, there are some humorous touches reminiscent of The Little Rascals like when Edith and Tommy are riding in a makeshift boat or when Tommy and a little brother are comparing which one has the bigger measles! I don't want to reveal any more, just that I very much enjoyed Five Little Peppers and How They Grew and looking forward to the rest of the series entries...

lugonian FIVE LITTLE PEPPERS AND HOW THEY GREW (Columbia, 1939), directed by Charles Barton, based on the book and characters created by Margaret Sidney, became another one the studio's own contribution in family oriental films. Cashing in on the popularity to the "Blondie" comedies that initially began in 1938 featuring Penny Singleton (Blondie), Arthur Lake (Dagwood) and Larry Simms (Baby Dumpling) as the Bumstead family, Columbia attempt on a new series was far different from Chic Young's comic strip characters. The Peppers appear to be more towards the range of families depicted from either Alice Hegan Rice's "Mrs. Wiggs of the Cabbage Patch" or Kate Douglas Wiggins' "Mother Carey's Chickens." While those aforementioned titles developed into a motion picture but not a series, "The Five Little Peppers" did, but to a short-lived degree. Before the Peppers are introduced, the initial opening, set in the office of J.H. King Investments, finds John H. King (Clarence Kolb), a business tycoon, hoping to acquire the additional 50 percent investment of a copper mine owned by John Pepper, a mining engineer who was killed in a cave in, leaving a wife and five children in a shanty town of Gusty Corners. The scene immediately shifts over to the Pepper family consisting of John's widow (Dorothy Peterson), and children, Polly (Edith Fellows), Ben (Charles Peck), Joey (Tommy Bond), Davie (Jimmy Leake) and little Phronsie (Dorothy Ann Seese) as they prepare themselves for another day. Mother's job working in a factory leaves Polly, the eldest, to care for the younger siblings. Hoping to acquire enough money to produce a birthday cake for their mother, Polly goes out to collect enough money owed her for the pressing of dresses for her neighbors. Unable to collect $1.50 from a Mrs. Peters, who happens to work for Mr. King, Polly heads over to the King estate where she encounters the tycoon's grandson, Jasper (Ronald Sinclair). Although not allowed to leave the grounds, Jasper, quite bored and lonely, spends his entire day in the Pepper household helping them with the making of a birthday cake. At home with grandfather, Jasper tells him how he's had more fun with the Peppers than being home under the watch of the servants. Learning of Jasper's association with the Peppers, King, along with Jasper, come to the Gusty Corners where he intends on closing a business deal with them. However, things change dramatically when the younger children are diagnosed with the measles, causing both King and Jasper to be quarantined under doctor's orders in the Pepper household. Due to exhausting work caring for her siblings, Polly collapses and becomes blind due to her illness. After the family is taken to the King mansion for rest and recovery, Polly begins to see things differently after overhearing King's discussion with his associates the reason why he's been so kind to them.Reportedly not an accurate reflection to the original story from which it was based, screenwriters Nathanie Bucknall and Jefferson Parker have taken the Pepper family out of the horse and buggy era to contemporary depression-era setting, devising a story of their own while keeping the concept of the main characters intact. For a movie consisting of children as its focal point, one would have expected this to be close to the situations found in the Hal Roach's comedy shorts of "Our Gang," where Tommy Bond (Joey Pepper) appeared a semi-regular as a bully named Butch. Rather than concentrating on the antics of kids in a straightforward comedy, THE FIVE LITTLE PEPPERS has developed more towards dramatics. Granted there's some humor deftly blended into the story, with one noteworthy scene as old man King struggles to get a good night's sleep while resting in the same bed with the two other tossing and turning Pepper boys. Edith Fellows, Columbia's contract child star since 1935, has really matured to a bright young teenager by this time. Of the five little Peppers, the one who garners the most attention is the youngest, the blonde moppet, Phronsie (Dorothy Ann Seese). Her character comes as a reflection of the female equivalent to Baby Dumplin (Larry Simms)from in the "Blondie" film series. Her cutesy performance can be either unbearably annoying or totally delightful, depending how an any individual viewer might accept this. Virtually forgotten in both film and book form by today's standards, and never distributed to home video or DVD, THE FIVE LITTLE PEPPERS AND HOW THEY GREW finally surfaced on Turner Classic Movies in 2007. It's broadcast not only casts a reflection on old-fashioned family stories, but a rediscovery to both Margaret Sidney's created characters and Columbia's own Edith Fellows, whose strength and fine performance keeps this 58 minute programmer going. (** pepper shakers)

rpniew I remember reading the novel as a child and becoming thoroughly entranced by it. Over the years I remembered it fondly; in the Nineties, when similar-themed films like "The Secret Garden", "A Little Princess", and "Little Women" were released, I thought a film version of this book would fit in nicely. I was unaware that a film version had already been produced. When I saw it listed on TCM a couple of weeks ago, I made a point of getting up early and watching it. I was first shocked to see --- gasp --- a car. Modern clothes (by 30s standards)! Although the film was certainly watchable and had its charm, it was clearly not the book I remembered. Someday someone will film the novel accurately.

longrush The craft of fiction is a matter of physically stacking the cards. The art of fiction is doing so in a manner that no one notices that the cards have been stacked. The problem with this movie is that it is easy to see just how the writers went about working the deck. It lacks all spontaneity.There is a nice gauzy late-depression (1939) feel to it. "Grapes of Wrath" it isn't. There's a poor family of five children and a mother (no father even though one reviewer remembered one) who works hard to keep it all together. The stove smokes in their humble but clean kitchen. There's little food in the pantry. Not far away lives a hideously wealthy old man with his grandson. By contrivance, they are put together, and after a series of near disasters (I never believed there was real jeopardy), things are put aright in a warm and fuzzy way. You sort of knew that this wasn't going to be a tragedy when you saw all those cute kids.The acting is of the present day sitcom variety, i.e. not very good, litotes for bad. But there is one exception. The little girl, youngest of the children, is marvelous. Too often very young actors sing-song their recited lines. Not so here. What ever became of her? This is a rather nice movie to watch when you're not feeling well. It passes the time while not requiring a thing from you.