JohnHowardReid United Artists, 12 March 1943, George Archainbaud. Based on the 1941 novel, Hopalong Cassidy Serves a Writ, by Clarence Edward Mulford.CAST: William Boyd, Andy Clyde, Jay Kirby, Victor Jory, George Reeves, Jan Christy, Hal Taliaferro, Forbes Murray, Bob Mitchum, Byron Foulger, Earle Hodgins, Roy Barcroft, Ben Corbett. 67 minutes. (Available on an excellent Echo Bridge or a likewise Platinum Disc DVD). COMMENT: Number 44 (or 46, depending upon whose numbering system you're using - Zinman's or Marill's) -- in the series, is the first to be directed by George Archainbaud who handled all twelve of Boyd's personal productions (numbers 55 through 66). Good old George A. certainly commences his stint most promisingly. There's a first-class fight between Hoppy and the villain and other sequences of excitingly staged action. True, the climax itself is a bit disappointing, but that can't be blamed on the director. It's simply the way Gerald Geraghty's script (based on an actual Mulford novel for a change) pans out. On the other hand, this makes the movie a bit different from others in the series where all the action is saved for the final reel. To accommodate dark stock footage, Russell Harlan's photography is slightly below his usual brilliant standard. Of course, what most people will want to know is how Robert Mitchum comes out of this affair. Bob plays a member of the cattle rustling gang. He figures in a few scenes and even has one or two lines, but then unaccountably disappears. We don't see him at the climax at all. According to Marill, the correct order of the Mitchum Hoppies is Border Patrol, this one, The Leather Burners, Colt Comrades, Bar 20, False Colors, and Riders of the Deadline.

chipe Nothing special in this Hoppy movie other than William Boyd's winning personality. He shines in all the Hoppy series. I enjoyed his warm, chuckling condescension to most everyone in the movie -- his enemies, his sidekicks, et. al. One good example is when he arrives incognito as a gentleman gambler at a saloon looking for the bad guys. Hoppy sits in at a poker game, taking the favorite (empty) chair of the main bad guy (Victor Jory). Jory walks over later, angry, and tells Hoppy, "Didn't anyone tell you that is my chair?" Hoppy replies, "Yeah, but I am not particular." That cracked me up.The plot and the actors were nothing special. It was Robert Mitchum's first film roll, a small part. Nothing was asked of him, and he didn't do anything at all special in the roll, sleepy looking as usual, as though they didn't pay him enough. I did like George Reeves' (TV's Superman) acting.One neat plot ploy was when Reeves was captured by Hoppy and Co., but refused to tell where in the cabin the money was hidden. But Hoppy kept his eye on Reeves as Hoppy's sidekick moved about the room looking for the money. When he got close, Hoppy knew where the money was based on Reeves' flinching reaction! One laughably silly scene was at the end when Hoppy threw his rope to lasso three retreating bad guys together at the same time! Yes, all three squeezed together inside the loop of the rope!

zotch40 Everybody mentions Robert Mitchum in this movie, but if you coughed at the right time, you miss his entire dialog. George Reeves had the meatier part and looked Superman-ish in it. Victor Jory was a well known actor who did a lot more than cowboy baddies. Two others stood out for me. One was Earl Hudgins, the barkeep, a solid character actor who had a long list of movie credits, usually as some kind of con artist. The other was Roy Barcroft, a competent heavy in many TV cowboy shows of the 50s. In this, he had a minor part as a rancher with a complaint. There was plenty of action in this Hoppy flick if you count all the endless horse riding and the several long gunfights. The one nothing part was the lone female who gave up acting after this, her first and last job in Hollywood.

Single-Black-Male The 26 year old Robert Mitchum made his screen debut in this film. I'm not too sure how good an actor he really is because he always seems to sound the same. The true test is when you compare him acting as an antagonist as opposed to a protagonist. He's a better protagonist because he's the consistent broad shouldered, tall American.