kingcantonano7
After watching this film for only five minutes it dawned on me, where have I heard this music score before? Then, after about another forty minutes I thought, this story seems familiar........And then it hit me, I'm watching a near perfect copy of the Harrison Ford film 'Presumed Innocent'.Apart from a slightly different ending (and it is only slight) this story/film is a rip off of the Harrison Ford classic. The only difference is, is that 'Innocent' has terrible acting compared to the higher standard in 'Presumed Innocent'. If you want a good thriller/whodunit forget this film and watch 'Presumed Innocent' instead!I'm giving it a score of 2 out of 10 just for the fact I like the music!
perkypops
This is an efficient movie with some neat twists and turns in the solving of a crime. It is largely inoffensive because it is constructed to the well worn formula of finger pointing to a murderer and then seeing just how many things can change your mind before the credits roll.The acting is reasonable but not sensational with the victim, Barbara (Marcia Gay Harden), being the best at everything in the back story played out throughout the film. Nothing sticks out as faulty, but it is not especially memorable either.If you like courtrooms and enjoy trying to work crimes out then it is worth a rental.
susenet
Scott Turow is an amazing writer because of his ability to give full, rich, textured lives to most of the characters in a book. In his fictional world of Kindle county, even the peripheral figures have great,textured back-stories. He has great insight into human nature. It's too bad that you can see almost none of this in the TV movie version of Innocent.I watched this movie shortly after reading the book. The book was fascinating and absorbing. While the movie was competently made, it lacked most of the detail that makes Turow's books so rich and interesting. The recorded version of the book is 14 hours long, and none of that time was wasted or boring. The movie was probably less than 90 minutes, if you take out the commercial breaks. There was no way for them to compress so much character development and plot into such a small space. And in my opinion, it was wrong to try.Unfortunately, though the movie isn't awful, I can't think of any reason to recommend it. There are some good performances, but the script is just too skeletal to do justice to this story. I hope that the next time Scott Turow gets an movie offer on one of his great books, that he holds out for a miniseries instead.
evening1
Every part in this made-for-TV drama is very well-acted. Unfortunately, "Innocent" is a bit too clever for its own good and the story doesn't quite hold together.I don't like bestsellers and have never opened a Scott Turow book. Nor have I ever seen a Turow film. I have avoided TV court dramas since Perry Mason. So I'm not well-versed in this genre. Maybe I'm naive but I could not fathom how Rusty figured copping to obstruction would save his son.Bill Pullman was a surprise here -- his every scene was riveting. I've never paid much attention to Pullman but I'll definitely watch for him going forward. The scene of Rusty's pillow talk with Anna was positively scary.It was creepy to see the incestuous secret kept from Pullman's son. The stakes were high and it troubled me to see this character manipulated.Marcia Gay Harden and Mariana Klaveno were superb as rivals for Pullman's devotion. I was surprised at how good practically everyone was in this trifle. Kudos also to Tahmoh Penikett, Richard Shiff, Alfred Molina, and Nimet Kanji.
AD
