philipposathina Like in Ridley Scott's film, so in this one we have the story of two desperate women who fed up with the depression they get from their lives, decide to try their own getaway in an effort to be free and liberated. Only in "Thelma and Louise" we have the case of two otherwise very "main stream" females like the big majority of the average ordinary women and wives of the real world are, who facing the same routine never realize the depression which marks them through the conformity of the men's world they have to live in as women, wives, girl friends. Given this,"Thelma and Louise"'s characters represent the average modern woman to whom they deliver a straightforward feminist message: "You think that you are free and emancipated, well you are not!" . In Buchareb's film on the other hand, being a woman is only a part of the whole thing. What we have here is the case of two persons who are oppressed not just because they are women, but also because they are "different" women. Oppressed by husbands, mothers in law, even other women either because they can not have children, or because they like belly dance, even because they are dark skinned, the tortures of the main characters of the film are clearly not only associated with their sex but also with the fact that they try to pursuit their unconventional wishes. Being women makes things worse, but even if they were males they would have to undergo the same or similar discrimination, hence the only ones who sympathize with them and are kind and helpful to them, are the ones who are victims of discrimination themselves - the Indian Americans of the Indian land area-. I did like the film. The story was intriguing and touching, the acting was good, and the Arab music sonic background adorable!

leplatypus An American road movie about two women in a red car. It's « Thelma & Louise » from Ridley Scott for sure but you are wrong : it's this « just like a woman » from french director Bouchareb. As he is a famous director in my country for « Indigenes », i really don't understand why this movie was still unknown, above all it has such famous cast : Zem + Golshifteh + Sienna. In all cases, all my fellows french ignorant don't know what they miss as it's really a strong, moving movie. Maybe the stories of those women can be a little too much in despair and bad relationships (which husband can cheat on Sienna or be distant to Golshifteh ?) but their trip is just a great breath of liberty, freedom and dreams ! I don't know about you but i resent my actual life the same way they did : i'm a bachelor so maybe I don't know about quarrels but i'm for sure restless and if i'm not without job, the one i do is just alienation. So, like those 2 women, i would like to run away « where the streets have no name » like U2 sing accurately ! Actually, the movie offers this opportunity for a too short 90 minutes and in addition, it's also back to nature and escaping civilization because this team goes camping in the West. And can you imagine that for this fundamental trip, you go along brunette Goldsifeth and blonde Sienna. It's a dream-team for me as i appreciate the two of them but if Sienna can find now at least one good movie, for personal reason, the black sad eyes of Goldsigeth just take me away !

alinaderzad Not sure why Rachid Bouchareb would make such a movie. The guy's been involved in some heavy-duty historical projects that have been very well-received in the past. Why, Rachid, why?For some reason, all his movie magic goes right out the door in this uninspiring and impotent road movie featuring a Golshifteh Farahani, in her usual affected demeanor (deep, slow and tragic voice, and the big dark eyes that never seem to blink) entirely devoid of any charisma, a Siena Miller who's trying to save the scenes on her own, and some of the worse performances (lines are spoken artificially and thoughtlessly) from just about everyone. The fact that Bouchareb would hire a French actor like Roshdy Zem (who's otherwise a great actor) is evidence that somebody either lost a bet or had to repay a past favor. Zem is awkward speaking in English and his performance is none the better for it.Farahani was magical and arresting in The Patience Stone. She had a lot of presence when she shared the screen with Di Caprio. Her performance is a fail in Just like a Woman, as is Bouchareb's directing. Nothing to see here, keep moving, folks.

junktom I watched this film thinking it will be a "Thelma and Louise" cross "Flashdance" road movie. Why not? The poster with their face together wearing shades, and blue sky and desert in the background, what could go wrong? They seemed to had a good start, great actresses, and a new theme (belly dancing), all except their weak story.First of all, it's about belly dance, but it appeared to filmmaker that belly dancing was nothing more than waving arms and shimmying hips, and not a very good one at that. Whatever happened to belly rolls, backbends and other symbolic techniques? If these girls are as passionate as they claimed, they should be dancing beyond beginner's level.And then there's the character built up. Obviously Mona's story was far more interesting, and if this were a film exploring foreign marital culture in America, it would have been perfect. Unfortunately, this doesn't seem to be the director's intention, he sent two cops to merely skimmed the surface, took up many unnecessary minutes on their investigation, which reflected very little of Mona's behavior, yet didn't help the case in the big way, police matter seem to just vanished in the middle of the story.Marilyn's character was also lame. She could afford to pay rent, feed her white trash boyfriend, and pay for belly dance classes all with a single desk job, and then she drove out to nowhere for shows that could barely cover her gas money. What kind of women keeps camp-ready equipment in the back of her trunk anyway?The ending left both characters uncertain of their future. Mona didn't want to return to her husband, even though he's nice enough to start a new life with her, Marilyn was worse, losing everything she came for, and nothing left in her return.Finished watching the movie left me uncertain of what the filmmaker trying to say. Did he want to tell the story of Mona and explore her culture regarding mistreatment toward feminism? If so, it would have been better if the story was focus on Mona alone, with either the policemen or Marilyn explore Mona's world.Or, if it's about character developments, there should be more conversations at the end, to show each other's view and future planning, show what they learned from this journey, as well as what WE learn from it. The film left audience puzzled and unsatisfied.