Bene Cumb In a generally steady and advanced country, it is difficult to create an intensive political film and remain realistic as most thriller fans are eager to follow sophisticated conspiracies, events of several levels, and the opponents not afraid of using "ultimate" measures. But the makers of Kongekabale have succeeded in this, beginning with the trigger event... On the other hand, we get the real picture early (perhaps too early) and then it remains us to observe how the things develop and what measures are taken by both sides. Luckily, the tensions are maintained, all main persons have their ups and downs, paving the way for expected, but realistic end (and the scene when a lie is publicly revealed is solved in an interesting, different manner). The cast is strong as well - many of the actors are often used in crime series and thrillers playing both the good and the bad - and the inclusion of Nicolas Bro as Henrik Moll provided several giggling moments into the often depressive atmosphere and background.And of course, all this shows that Denmark is a democratic country with rather low crime, in many other countries rivals or nosy people get killed or get lost...

FilmFlaneur Without a single car chase, gunfight or romantic encounter between the principals throughout its 100-minute length, King's Game smacks of low-key, tense authenticity - not surprisingly, as the original novel was written shortly after the writer quit his job as spin-doctor for the Conservative party in Denmark. I don't know the Danish political scene, but British viewers will feel right at home in the murky world on show here full of secrecy, spin and jostling for power, as parties desperate for re-election are racked by internal doubts and power struggles, the obliging media pawns in the process.Full of committee room angst, paper trails and anxious phone calls, Arcel's first film has few dull moments while all the performances, slightly glum in the fashion familiar to those who watch a lot of Nordic drama, hold the attention. Ironically the film's strengths are also its main weaknesses as, whilst reasonably gripping and claiming to be based around true events, the unfolding story is never earthshaking enough to keep one on the edge of the chair. Although set ostensibly during the middle of the election campaign, much of the wider political world is marginalised by the script, what is presumably nationwide news kept down to a few top level principals and key players. There is none of the intimidating fatal razzmatazz of say, The Parallax View (1974), in which the greater game played by the party machine and vested interests is made clear. The result is that we see events somewhat in isolation; and while Dreier's machinations are to be condemned and defeated, they are quickly enough unravelled while the identity of the chief villain is known early on.At the end of the day it's a conspiracy that's small beer compared to political plots of the past. Try as they might too, Moll and Trop (who "sound like a bad rock band," as one says of their unlikely, downbeat association) are no Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein, the investigating superstars of All The Presidents Men (1976). An unlikely duo from the start, there is little spark between them, other than growing appreciation and respect, this while the exact relationship of Moll to the parliamentary press lobby, apart from being an outsider, is uncertain. Their eventual teaming up is low-key and understated, the viewer missing more scenes of exposition between them to underline their essential decentness. But the two men work well together; Trop is clearly the more dynamic of the two just as Moll offers, by return, his essential contacts and cynical experience of the system. At the close of the film, whilst the opening of Trop's car door symbolically admits his new journalistic comrade into his more respectable 'world' suggesting the permanence of unlikely trust built between the two men, one doubts that their relationship will really lead on to greater things, or indeed will survive the next breaking story.For more effective and overtly dramatic scenes one has to look elsewhere in the film - notably the moment where, still in a tail spin from his initial professional crisis, Torp returns home to his wife, to find his father there waiting for him. Urged to swallow his pride and to swim with the flow (i.e. stop proving such a thorn in the side to the establishment), Torp angrily refuses his father's suggestions, eventually telling him to clear out. As part of the brief but heated exchange which ensues, his father verbally cuts his son's wife short, and Torp thereupon accuses him of treating his wife the way he does his own. It is a telling exchange, signifying Torp's obstinate pride and self worth, as well as revealing a gap, suddenly exposed, between two generations. King's Game can thus be seen just as much about Torp's need to be morally independent from the accepted system in which he arrives as well as from his father (who seems to have done very well on the basis of his earlier career), as it is about wider political chicanery.Because of this 'other' centre of concern, and lack of broad campaign perspective giving background to events, Arcel's film sometime feels drawn on a smaller scale than it ought. One has no idea of the original novel's strengths, but remembers that a writer like C.P. Snow say, who delineated the corridors of power in his books some years back, would have made more of the relationships and compromises between decision makers. Shot in widescreen but with little visual flourish or attempt to open things out cinematically, King's Game would arguably work just as well as a TV movie presentation, albeit a superior one. There's a sense of claustrophobia about the result that can be effective, but one hopes in vain for anything notable in the many interior set-ups, which remain unremarkable. Even the most shocking moment in the film - a suicide in a wood, which for many British viewers bares uncomfortable faint echoes of that of Dr David Kelly - is depicted with restraint, the film going out of its way again to avoid sensationalism.Tense, absorbing and with a relatively uncluttered storyline for a conspiracy thriller, King's Game is well worth a viewing, then - although it's by no means the best of its type. And, as the film concludes, and in a postscript we learn that a 'rehabilitated' politician has been given a plum EEC job, there may be a wry smile on the face of the rising audience, but many will want to see better things yet emerging from contemporary Danish cinema.

Jesper Engsted Kongekabale has received rave reviews in all of the Danish newspapers and apparently, this is the prime achievement of the Danish film industry in the last couple of years. However, in my opinion, the film has several flaws, which makes it mediocre at best.The biggest flaw is, like it said in another review on this page, that we don't really care about the characters. This is because of the fact, that the characters are not fully explored, but are rather used as plot devices. Furthermore, they are all stereotypes. The two journalist are virtually copies of Woodward and Bernstein ("All the President's men"), with one of them being a naive idealistic rookie journalist, and the other an experienced journalist who is fully aware of how rotten the system is. The spin doctor is also a stereotype with his slick appearance and behavior.The worst character, however, is "the bad guy" played by Søren Pilmark. I have never seen a character who is so purely evil as he is. Not once in the film do we see any sign of a redeeming feature. He wants to become the prime minister at any price. We never believe in him as a realistic character, because he is so one-sided.The script writer, the director and the actors have stated that this is a realistic view into the world of Danish politics. I find it difficult to believe that the Danish parliament is a place of greed and corruption of such gigantic Machiavellian proportions as this film claims. Even Oliver Stone who is considered by many to be a paranoid conspiracy theorist has a lot more nuances in his films, which makes the characters more believable. Unfortunately, this "golden age" of Danish cinema is characterized by black and white characters and stereotypes rather than originality and realism.

Daniel Clausen This is one of the movies that you see hundreds of from the big movie-mekka, Hollywood... But in the last couple of years, danish movies have improved radically, and producers abroad has gotten an eye open towards danish actors, producers, directors and so on and so forward... But most of our big hits have been comedies and action-movies, and almost always with an actor by the name of Kim Bodnia in the leading role... But now it's time to introduce the first danish thriller since Nattevagten (Nightwatch, as the American replicant of it is called), Kongekabale...The movie is based on a book by the same name, and the book is loosely based on a true story - with rewritten names and so on and so forward... The book got great reviews, and so did the movie... And it's just...I went to the cinema to watch the movie, as I read the book a couple of months ago and wanted to see if the movie could live up to the suspense of the book... And it does...With Søren Pilmark as the mean politician, who seems to be involved in all the mysterious happenings, and Anders W. Berthelsen as the nosey reporter, who smells something is wrong, we've got two of Denmarks best actors to ensure us of a good evening spend in front of the screen... Søren Pilmark, who is well-known for his comic-talent, shows a dark side of himself and delivers a GREAT performance... Anders W. Berthelsen, who got his real breakthrough this spring with a leading role in the danish drama-series Krøniken, shows a more progressive side of himself, and it suits him just as fine as the shy guy he is known for...With all this said, I can't say nothing else that:Go see the movie - it can easily live up to similar Hollywood-movies...