bkoganbing I was surprised to find that the song Ramona made so famous as the theme in the 1927 silent that gave Dolores Del Rio her most notable part in silent films was not included. It was such a very big hit, but I suppose there were copyright problems. In any event Alfred Newman's score for this version of Ramona is one of many things to recommend it.Another is the stunning color cinematography, this version of Ramona is the first western to be in technicolor. And apparently the color has held up well or the film had a good restoration. The cast is led by Loretta Young in the title role and Don Ameche in his breakout role as Alessandro the Indian who falls for Ramona and she him.Young who is a mixed race girl who has been raised at Pauline Frederick's hacienda in California of the 1870s has finds out about herself and confesses love for Ameche who is a top hand around the place. That earns her and Ameche banishment, but they go and start a farm of their own. But it's only the beginning of their troubles from newly arriving American settlers. Indians were specifically exempted from the Homestead Act and I'll say no more.Standing out in the supporting cast is Jane Darwell who is doing her part as the kindly pioneer woman who takes in Ameche and Young as a dress rehearsal for Ma Joad. She has her standards, but since Ameche and Young are Christians they're welcome in her house. In fact the three of them are the most 'Christian' characters in the film.One part that makes no sense to me is Kent Taylor as Frederick's son and soon to be patron of the hacienda. He's rather insipid and poorly defined as a character.Henry King is a director who should be given more study. Because he was studio contract director as opposed to an independent like Ford or Hitchcock he's given short shrift. Look down the list of his credits and you'll see some great classics. Other than Taylor and not his or Taylor's fault since the character is poorly defined he got great performances from his cast.Interracial love was one daring topic for 1936 or 1927 or even in silent versions before that. Ramona is a fine film of social significance and a great tragic romantic love story.

kayeohio1947 I have read the novel "Ramona" a few times, and it seems something was lost when the book was translated into film. First of all, the story takes place in the Spanish colonial days of California, and this is why the Native Americans are speaking with Spanish accents. The "gringo" white people (Americans) are seen as the villains because they mostly are Protestant and are moving into a predominantly Catholic area and are claiming land that had been granted to Spanish settlers by the King of Spain. There was this same ill feeling about gringos or "white settlers" when Texas was in the process of separating from Mexico and becoming part of the United States.As for Ramona's being a half-breed, the novel explains she is the child of the Spanish rancher and his Native American girl friend. The rancher brings her, as an infant, to the hacienda, and the rancher's wife agrees to bring up her husband's illegitimate daughter as if the child were her own or at least her social equal.I am not sure of Loretta Young's heritage, but I believe she was a devout Catholic and perhaps was of Latin descent. It so happens her sister Georgiana was married to Ricardo Montalban, so Miss Young was associated with Latin Americans in her private life. Mr. Ameche was an Italian-American and no doubt Catholic, so he fit into this story of Spanish-colonial California very well.I hope this explanation has helped some reviewers better understand the background of "Ramona." One of my favorite scenes is the priest coming to bless the flock of sheep and crops each spring. It is reminiscent of the same blessing in "The Thorn Birds" and the annual "Blessing of the Fleet" in the Gulf Coast area of the United States.

loschavez This is an oldie but goodie. I can't locate a copy anywhere, which may be understandable. I have to find it, becausewant my wife to see it.When I last saw it, black and white TV was the norm; so it's dated. Came to find out it was in Technicolor all the time! I'd read the famous novel as young and innocent teen, soon to be ravished by Loretta Young. (Listen; NOBODY was more beautiful than Loretta Young.) She was a fine Hollywood actress. The story of Ramona is a frontier tragedy, but nevertheless lovely. Loretta acted her part not only sweetly. She was really perfect as Ramona. None of the settings were extraordinary; just adequate.The plot is a little too mushy. Yet it's very romantic; you can't help being swept up in it, owing to both Loretta and young Don Ameche, at the peak of his stardom. He was what we'd call a hunk these days; with uncommon screen presence. Ameche could act; I don't think I ever saw him do any part poorly. Why hasn't this 1936 classic been re-mastered and saved on DVD? I'll keep on looking for a video. I'd rate "Ramona" easily a 6. --Ciao, movie fans!

dbdumonteil "Ramona" seems as far as a fairy tale ;the splendor of the technicolor and Loretta Young's luminous beauty add to its obsolete charms.The screenplay is melodramatic with an over possessive mother character that should have been more developed. Indians,particularly the male lead ,doesnot seem very authentic ,but who cares?Aunt Ri is a colorful character who resembles the old lady(Edna May Oliver) who takes in Fonda and Colbert in John Ford's "drums along the Mohawks trail" .She steals the show with her crude thinking: "they are not heathen people ,therefore they are nice people",and she prevents the final from completely falling into the mushy trap.The very end is rather implausible and was probably added to secure a -relatively- happy end.What really amazing is how the quality of the colors has successfully resisted to the passing of time.