dead poet I will attempt to review the vomit gore trilogy as a whole and save myself and everyone time.We must look at Lucifer valentines facade. In interviews he always goes on about how he was in a sexual relationship with his younger sister which he raised single handedly. She was a BLIND catatonic schizophrenic. this diagnosis doesn't even exists as it is now labelled as dissociative identity disorder.keep in mind more than half of clinical psychiatrist agree this disease is 100% caused by childhood trauma meaning it has 0 chances of being biological. considering this, how can Lucifer say she drowned herself in the bathtub after recreating a scene from SVD. this is obscured? does anyone see the problem with his statement yet?? how about now? how does a blind girl recreate something she SAW in a film. his girlfriends quote above is i would die for you, i would even kill for you.see where i am heading with this.something is seriously wrong with this account of his sisters demise. this pompous d*ck has the nerve to say his movies reflect quantum theory and higher levels of the human organism and consciousness. I'm sorry but saying i got abducted in 1973 and repeating this phrase 30 times while changing the date does not in anyway relate to quantum mechanics or the spiritual realm.how about the octopus on head scene in RGS.I think it went like this in real life. oh damn we forgot to use an octopus in the intestine puke scene. what do we do. LV chugs beers as he ponders. sets beer bottle on table put the octopus on his head walks in front of camera and shoves finger in mouth then pukes! *recycle*yeah the fx's are so bad you can tell the girls intestine is an octopus.i guess he never heard of using pig intestines.his drawings look like a 12 year old.he is too afraid to stand in public which makes me wonder if he is even a real person.i must admit the film is disturbing due to it being a scat film. for a horror movie it is very depraved and demented. you can't compare it to real scat films and say they are more disturbing because they are in a different spectrum of film. i hate the non stop cutting of film which actually makes the film less shocking. scenes are so fast you never really have time to absorb how messed up they are. again another attempt at being non linear or quantum theory w.e....just watch the non linear film waking life. This is a surrealist movie about the human condition in altered states and references quantum theory. as for his satanic title. please ...... anyone who knows anything about satanism knows its church only accepts the rich and powerful. They teach to destroy psychic vampires that drain your energy. so broken souls and schizophrenic sisters would be killed in a true satanic family.this guy is a joke. if he was to write a book it would only be pictures. i don't know which is easier to attack the films or the man behind them. i tend to think they are one of the same. a total fraud.i know you killed her! keep listening to burzum you Nazi!!! and stop connecting yourself to sun o))). fake intellectualism really makes me angry I'm sorry people.still BLIND people who can see.. This is a new one. There is a mystery to be unlocked here, possible more disturbing then the films themselves.

werewolfgal13 Still not very good. Having seen all of the trilogy I must say this is the best. It doesn't get any better or any more interesting so if you aren't going to watch these as a trilogy pick this one. Having to wade through piles of vomit isn't exactly fun but having to wade through piles of vomit to discern basic plot points is downright sadistic. I don't think any director is as pointedly cruel to his audience as Mr. Valentine is. Now, I'm okay with gross-out films (otherwise I wouldn't have given this a glance) and I'm okay with gross out art films (Aftermath comes to mind) but when they are good they are very very good and well this is just horrid. The stars awarded are mostly out of pity for the actors because really kudos for having the guts (no pun intended) to make this and the rest is for having the sheer audacity nay, bravery to spend years of life on making three films that are almost completely devoid of redeeming qualities save for an extremely niche audience. Not many directors would have the chutzpah to do this.

nasteen8 If you're reading this, then you've obviously watched the first installment of the series (or at least have a feel for what these "films" are about) so I won't try to explain them.If you've watched the first one and think it was too sick and twisted, you might as well just forget about this one. It's much more sinister than the first and definitely more graphic. Along with all the obvious gore and vomit (the series is called "Vomit Gore") there's a certain level of eroticism with the absolutely gorgeous twins. That aspect of the film was not lost on me at all and a definite plus for the second installment.Many people will say this is an art piece, still more will say it's nothing more than a fetish film but there are a small segment of the viewing audience that simply want an unpleasant film in their collection that's only there to cause controversy. I fall into this small category of cinephiles that simply love the strange and far out techniques used to make this film and ones like it. There's nothing to this film that gives it a social commentary (at least in my eyes). This is simply a film that pushes the boundary of viewing distaste and visceral torture.If you wish to be pushed to the edge of what's considered cinema, these films are for you. If you can't stomach the vomit, gore, sex, violence, and almost intolerable sound, don't bother watching any of these films.Thanks again Lucifer Valentine, you've given me a great time with your trilogy.

BA_Harrison Of all the objectionable imagery I have subjected myself to over the years, a bearded guy in scary face paint, smeared all over with blood, wearing a dead octopus on his noggin, and repeatedly puking into the skull cavity of a decapitated head has got to be a contender for 'most nauseating'. The amazing thing is, this scene from Lucifer Valentine's ReGOREgitated Sacrifice is just one of many in this film that could easily qualify for a place in my 'Top Ten Most Repulsive Moments in Movies' list!!The second film in Valentine's 'Vomit Gore' trilogy, ReGOREgitated Sacrifice is a relentless assault on the senses, an intense barrage of horrific avant garde imagery and sound designed to offend and disgust, and, unlike his first attempt, Slaughtered Vomit Dolls, it didn't bore the hell out of me with its repetitiveness and dreary pace. Although elements from the first film are re utilised (most notably, forced vomiting), ReGOREgitated Sacrifice isn't just the same thing over and over again ad nauseum: Valentine ups the ante with each outrageous scene, daring the viewer to stay with him to the bitter end.It's a far from pleasant journey (with plenty of very impressively bloody prosthetics work to make matters all the more uncomfortable) and I haven't a clue what message Valentine is trying to convey (I had fun trying to understand, but any intended 'depth' was ultimately wasted on me), but it is a strangely compelling ride, a gruelling test for anyone who claims to have seen it all.