Michael Van Damme I've seen movies with similar budgets turn out to be quite successful despite the restraints put on them by their lack of funding. This film on the other hand takes that $140,000 budget and uses it to deliver a steaming pile of shart directly into your internal being; and once you see SotC you may never again be able to unsee it. I'm just going to jump to the point with this one, you'll absolutely love just how much you hate this movie. I mean it's quite astonishing the sensation you get from watching it. You'll enjoy the experience but also die a little inside in doing so. Simply put, there is no "liking" this movie. If someone were to say otherwise I would seriously question that person's sanity. The fact that it was even released out into the world still baffles me to this day. I made the unfortunate mistake of supporting this clown and to top off the icing on that cake of sadness, I've seen this movie not once, but THREE times. Believe me when I say I have no idea why, but I'll probably see it a 4th someday. You've probably made better movies with the very first cell phone you got in the early- mid 2000's which couldn't even take video. If you don't want to get mad to the point where you're seeing red, avoid this movie like the plague.

jtfriday2000 As of 8/12/2012, IMDb.com says this flick was made for $140,000. How is that possible? Somebody on IMDb.com must be pulling one helluva prank.This movie was shot on a camcorder featuring the worst excuse for fake blood I've seen in a long time (red lipstick and ketchup). The acting was atrocious. No one could care about any of the characters. The pacing was terrible. The script was garbage. Everything about this movie was garbage.Anyone who has heard about this flick probably saw it at their local Mart as a $5 movie pack and wants to know if it's worth it. It's only worth it if you're really bored and wanna waste your hard-earned cash. Others have bought it for the 80s horror flick Curtains.It cost $140,000 to make this flick? Perhaps the director used $1000 to make this flick and decided to pocket $139,000.

AdamR702 If you are watching this movie, you probably picked it up for $5 at Wal- Mart like I did than your expectations are as low as the price tag and the budget...... anyways this movie is good for what it is, the directing as it could be better has a good vision that is executed. The cinematography and camera work is the best part of this film. The angles they use are very effective and the lens used creates the dark and gloomy "saw" effect. The absolute worst part that keeps this movie from actually being something awesome is the acting, it is very forced and seems like they are not interested in the movie at all, honestly high school film students can portray characters better than this, but the acting as it is bad its also "good" because its funny. Along with the acting is the writing which its not bad but the delivery ruins it.Here is my gripe about the film, the post production work is what kept this from being a "cool boobs,blood,bad guy" campy horror flick. The voices are off so many times sometimes they say different words than what is heard. The foley and SFX along with the ambient music is good but the actors voice overs are just as bad as their screen performances. I think the story is the best part of this and if you want to get some friends to have some beers with and have some laughs see some boobs, blood, and bad guys kicking ass than watch this its a movie for $1.25 (it came with 3 others) and you get what you pay for.

gavin6942 Writer and director Ryan Badalamenti opens up the world of Bobby and Val for us. They're the typical couple in love, with two glaring exceptions: first, her love for her clown doll might exceed her love of Bobby. And second, their friends are in the habit of getting brutally murdered. Who is the killer, and what is the secret of the clown doll?As someone who semi-professionally reviews low budget films, I always walk into the movie expecting to be visually tortured. For example, just a night earlier, I watched "Raptor Island", which ranks among the most horrible films ever made (yet is still somehow good enough to make it on TV). Let me ease your fears: "Secrets of the Clown" is not one of those low budget films -- it has a great plot, decent characters and a villain that can really kick some butt.A specific concern I had with this film was the "clown horror subgenre" stigma. After "It" and "Killer Klowns From Outer Space", most people -- and I was in this group -- think we've said all we need to about clowns. Well, Badalamenti proved me wrong. "Secrets" is a welcome addition to the genre, and goes to new heights no one has dared take it before.The movie isn't perfect by a long shot. Some scenes, most notably the introduction, seem to be poorly lit and it's hard to make out what's going on. Some of the acting is a bit stiff, particularly from Paul Pierro (Bobby). When Bobby is among his friends, Pierro's limits really shine through as he is outdone by every other actor on the screen. Some of their acting seemed forced, but it wasn't anything more tragic than the average Rolfe Kanefsky ("Hazing", "Nightmare Man") film, and I have a special love in my heart for Rolfe.Those concerns aside, there's plenty to love about "Secrets of the Clown". The director and director of photography know the camera and know their targets. Plenty of angles are used and we're not treated to the same boring "point and shoot" method one all-too-often runs across. The score also deserves a mention -- the blend of incidental music and good, clean rock was apparent from the start and used in all the appropriate places. The last thing you want is an absence of sound or too much and the balance here is perfect.Horror fans who crave blood will get blood. Oh yes, there will be blood! Not much in the gore department, and far too many of the killings happen off-camera... but I cannot stress enough about the blood. This film is an exploding aneurysm with gallons and gallons of glorious blood! Contrary to Paul Pierro's performance (where his best line is a "South Park" reference), we have actor Micheal Kott, who plays the psychic. Kott is phenomenal, with both his character and his acting nothing short of outstanding. While the film is good before Kott arrives, it becomes a whole new movie when he's on screen and something you can't take your eyes off. From his entrance to the final battle (but who fights who? you have to wait and see), Kott steals the show.Not to give anything away, but this film has more than a few plot twists. I thought I knew five minutes in where the movie was going. I was wrong. Then I thought an hour in I understood, but I was wrong. But despite the twists, everything still makes perfect sense, which is more than I can say for some trendy writers who think a twist -- sensical or not -- is all a film needs. M. Night Shyamalan could learn a lesson from Ryan Badalamenti.So, should you see "Secrets of the Clown"? I think anyone who enjoys lower budget or independent horror should have to say yes. Forget Hollywood blockbusters and expensive CGI -- this is what horror was meant to be. Oh, and for those who love skin... keep your eyes open for Playboy model Susie Christine. You won't be disappointed.