badheadcontent
If there ever was a movie that should have never been thought of, written, shared, cast, rehearsed, shot, edited nor released, this is it.
TerribleKatherine
Compared to this, Showgirls is a Oscar winning masterpiece. Nothing, absolutely nothing, in this movie is even decent. The plot, the acting, the camera work is all horribly wrong. The only reason to watch this is you want to take tips of how not to make a bad movie.
arfdawg-1
145 minutes of soft core porn you didn't know you needed.Yes, the acting is as non existent as the story, but you are not tuning in for either.You want to see hot chicks making out with each other and with guys too.The woman who stars in this also wrote and directed it. Only I bet you never heard of her. I sure didn't.She's got a smoking body with a long in the tooth face that sort of ruins the titillation.I'm not sure i this was ever released theatrically or went right to Cinemax After Dark, but it appears to be shot digitally so the harsh face is really harsh.But the smoking body is really smoking.The movie is a train wreck, but no more than the original Showgirls! In some ways it's better because it doesn't appear to take itself seriously. It's more of a showcase for the butterface Jerry Lewis of strippers. actor, director, producer, writer.
Shorty Pimp
I really don't think we needed a sequel to the awful Showgirls almost 20 years after the fact. Imagine Showgirls horrible acting and nonsense plot only even worse, along with a home camcorder and no budget for effects or proper editing. The video is horrible, the sound is horrible, it doesn't even have the hint of sensuality that Showgirls 1 failed to ultimately deliver. The only redeeming feature of this film is Rena Riffel looks just as good as she did back then, possibly even better. If this had been a little campier it could have gone into cult status. As such its just a really bad amateur film the world never needed. If you need a T&A fix there's better movies, not the least of which is the unrated Showgirls.
AD
