desert_dilbert
Normally one watches movies which are less than $10 for the depravity, the nudity, or to just laugh at a bad bit of cinema. This provides you with campily over acted depravity, a few (less than 2 min. total probably) nude scenes, and some attempts to attempt to make bad cinema. I don't think that a fraternity watching this on movie night would enjoy it, not even to laugh at it. If someone breaks into your place and at gunpoint forces you to watch this, save yourself and watch it. Seriously. If your personal jeopardy isn't involved, use whatever means necessary to not watch it. Go visit your mother, help someone move, or volunteer as a bed pan changer at your local senior home. Do ANYTHING else with your time other than watch this movie. Seriously. You're welcome in advance for saving you from this cinematic pestilence.
reaper1800
When compared to modern studio horror offerings, which often miss the point of the films they were inspired by, Jacob Ennis has encapsulated the exploitation films that inspires him perfectly. Much like 1972's "Last House on the Left" or Al Adamson's "I Spit on Your Corpse" Ennis creates an all too real universe of white trash, brutal violence, and backwoods sensibilities. Of course this is often missed by reviewers who would say, "How dare you compare this to 'Last House'?", the same reviewers who idolize "Last House" not because they understand it but because they believe that by worshiping this film they are to be counted among "real" horror fans. It is obvious when watching this film that Ennis understands what made "Last House" work. Ennis will only grow as a filmmaker. For those who understand "Stash" and why it has been embraced by G4, Fangoria, and independent horror fans, we will no doubt see great things from Ennis in the future. If you're expecting the same PG-13, sanitized, studio crap that's being released en masse by Hollywood or the supposedly "shocking" horror of Eli Roth films, then you're likely to be disappointed by Ennis' outstanding throwback to an age when exploitation was not a trend to be embraced by "wanna be" horror fans but by those who "got it" and those who understand that low budget cinema is far more true an art form than what a studio film can provide.
Arif Moghal
The movie is nothing more than a piece of crap.. Total waste of time.. I think they shot the film using a handy cam, and the camera movements were all the time shaky, needless to say junk storyline... Funniest thing is you will feel, that time is going at a snails pace... Pathetic acting by the actors rubs salt on the wound... I have seen many movies which were total crap but this one tops the list.. I watched this movie after going through the reviews.. But I made a big fool of myself.. Reviews are like opinions... They differ.. But my god, this movie.. The least said about it the better. I think the crew who were a part of the movie, will never ever get any chance to act in any movie again..Don't even bother to review.. it ... Just fly past the movie.. Goshh..
thejoo05
Let me first off by saying this was good idea for a horror flick, but this was just a difficult movie to watch, and to take seriously as an independent film. The acting was just poor and it looked like it was made by a group of friends who think they can act, with a cheap digital camera, and edited with iMovie. The dialogue seemed very forced, and that I can believe that even the actors were reading lines than acting their roles. Even all the physical contact just looked fake. And the fact that they show every detail just got annoying, if someone lost service, I get that by seeing a reaction and a line, I don't need to see the phone that shows it. I know that we all start somewhere, and I hope that these people keep trying, I just hope that they get better with time. If this was their first attempt I say they gave it a good shot.
AD
