glphil
Quite an accomplishment for a first film on a micro budget. Obviously all the haters & whiners haven't an inkling of what it takes to produce a film.The movie is gritty and the effects aren't the greatest... However the plot is coherent, the acting is decent and the pacing was sufficient to hold my complete attention through out the whole movie.This movie was shot with an £8000 (about $12,000 US?) budget. Mr Stirton also only had TEN days for shooting. Considering this, it's a miracle that this movie was A LOT better than some SciFi flicks I've seen that cost a hundred times more!
PortosM
It is OK movie if it would be done by high school kids for their friends. It is way below limits be called "professional". There isn't plot, no actors' play and visual looks like you see it through the plastic film. I was so glad that I have FF button on my remote, 32x worked really well. I understand that everyone need to start somewhere, but it shouldn't be reason to bring it to the public. If you have concerns about quality and budget - "Open water" was made on $60000 and more than half went to the guy who provided the security in the ocean and trained sharks. And that movie looks 100 times more professional and it was an event in the indy film-making.
john in missouri
This movie is proof you can't just go to a Redbox and read descriptions of films and pick one and give it a try.While I'll give 'em great credit for having produced a film with halfway-decent special effects on such a low budget, and at least a halfway decent script and story line... unfortunately, it was only just that: halfway decent.If you like movies where things aren't all neatly wrapped up, and don't mind low-budget effects, you might like this film. Honestly, it wasn't really my cup of tea. I should've just gone to bed rather than spend my time watching.For a better science-fiction movie produced on an even LOWER budget (!) have a look at "Primer."
DrKDB
I pride myself in being able to sit through everything. I think "if I've paid the rental fee, then I'm going to at least watch it". I have found the exception to this rule- The Planet. I don't know what the exchange rate is, but reading through the other comments I can only guess that £8000 must be around $150. I'll date myself but this movie reminds me of the old Steve Reeves movies of the 50's. He was a bodybuilder turned actor. He was in these really awful Italian, dubbed movies that starred Reeves as Hercules or some other muscle bound hero. As a kid watching them you couldn't quite articulate why these movies stunk- you just knew they did. Mike Mitchell IS the new Steve Reeves. That's it.. that's what this really was- a new telling of an old Italian "Spaghetti Sand and Sandals" movie. And, I kid you not- where was Reeves born? Glasgow, Montana. This movie isn't so bad that it's kind of fun to watch- it's just plain bad.
AD
