ElMaruecan82 A civilization is a tree whose branches expand to the world while deeply rooted in the motherland, the one place where we cease to be a stranger. But there are eternal strangers who never belong to the place they live in, we call them Nomads, Romani or Gypsies. They have a culture, a language, a music (and how!) and while there might not be a place, there will always be a "Time of the Gypsies". On Youtube, an Internet user said about that scene where a devastated Perhan drowns his sorrow in booze and music: "I don't understand what he's singing but it's like I understand everything." That's exactly how emotionally affecting Emir Kusturica's movies are and his 1988 masterpiece that won the Cannes Prize for Best Directing is no exception. Kusturica's movies are culturally specific but universally cathartic. Universal to a certain extent... even if it's set somewhere in Yugoslavia, this is a film about the gypsies, perhaps the most misunderstood if not disdained people on Earth, connected to many infamous caricatures from stealing chicken to prostitution.And it says a lot when the main character is the fruit of the passion between a Slovenian soldier and a gypsy mother who died after giving birth to his sister a few years later. Perhan, to name him... and to call a spade a spade, is a bastard, but Kusturica almost gives this word a touch of nobility, as if it captured the existential status of gypsies, they have traditions and pride but they don't know where they're from, they belong to the present, and their greatest tragedy is to keep on longing for a past so unknown and so far it is deemed to carry a shadow of mystery. Perhan is mysterious in his own way, a young and nerdy insecure boy with a talent for accordion, a turkey for a companion and a telekinetic power. He was raised by his grandmother, the kind of stereotypical gypsy woman whom you'd give her palm and trust whatever she says about your future but there's nothing cliché about her, she's perhaps one of the most loving and endearing mother figures from any movie, she drinks, she smokes, forgives her depraved son and love her grandchildren. Ljubica Adzovic gives the kind of performances that always gets Oscar nods, it's a disgrace that she didn't win anything at Cannes, or maybe she's just too authentic for that. Still, she's as pivotal to the film as she is in Perhan's life. Perhan who falls in love with Azra but can't marry her because her mother wouldn't give her daughter's hand to a bastard. This prompts Perhan to become someone and he promises the mother that she'll soon kiss his feet. Circumstances help him when the grandmother cures the son of a rich man named Ahmed (Bora Todorovic, the band leader in "Underground"). Ahmed promises to take Perhan under his protections and takes his sister to a hospital in Slovenia, so she can be cured from a severe leg condition. But the film isn't much about that story than it is about the young boy who encapsulates the exhilaration and tragedy of being a gypsy. As a bastard, he's twice an outcast and ostracized in his own community, forcing him to resort to crime in order to win quick cash and become respected. And with his glasses and nerdy smile, Dujmovic bears a striking resemblance with Dustin Hoffman in "Papillon" or "Straw Dogs" while as the film progresses, his hair grow and he looks more like Hoffman or a Pacino in their prime, with that intensity in the eyes and that oddly charismatic vulnerability.The actor committed suicide in 1999, was it drugs? The Yugoslavian tragedy? Or some secret demons he took to the grave? Whatever it was, I suspect he carried that early enough so it could translate into this performance, one of the greatest performances from a relatively unknown actor, and perhaps the most intense performance in any Kusturica film. Dujmovic is the first reason to enjoy the film or perhaps the second after the music, I saw this film 25 years ago, and I remember I was mesmerized by the themes from Goran Bergovic. I never forgot the scene where they were all floating in the river, following some ancestral ritual and the one where Perhan got drunk after realizing he would also have a bastard as a son. These two emotional peaks illustrate gypsies' predestination for parties because there's so much melancholy and sadness one would rather try to forget them. And yet the film doesn't sugarcoat the other aspects such as prostitution or human traffic, it exposes them with some sort of cynicism on the surface but in reality a way to show that once you don't have rules, you do with what you have at hands and you're the one to set your own limitations or code of honor. The film doesn't show gypsies enjoying begging or stealing or selling children, but it finds a way to show that pride is a variable parameter, a bit like in "The Godfather" when you disdain Mafia but you understand why it exists. And for a culture torn between the European accordion and Oriental tunes waltz (I come from North Africa, I can tell you their dances isn't different from ours), nothing surprises me anymore. That's who the Gypsies are, people at the crossroads of the Western and Oriental world, a marriage never bound to happen but worthy of a celebration, the film opens and ends with Kusturica's iconic leitmotif of a wedding leading to a tragedy, and yet a rebirth, a symbol reprised in his "Underground". Kusturica has a unique talent to immerse you into the depths of a civilization, as if we were the objects Perhan could move with his simple wizardry, this might be an allegory of Kusturica power. It's all about moving us and making us move at the beat of a trumpet ... or fly like his smiling brides.

peruhealing Not sure why the film has such positive reviews. It is predictable in the sense that you know the main character is getting screwed, you know nothing good will come of it, and you have a pretty good idea how it will all end. You can't do anything about it, so if you choose to watch it to the end, you just end up feeling bad about human beings in general. I did not watch the last 30 minutes or so, because I already knew what was coming. There is very little comedy in this film, and a lot of drama. The drama is good but you have to be into heavy films. I much preferred the only other film I saw by Kustrica - Life is a Miracle. To me that film is a masterpiece. This one is not quite.

emilylippman Kusturica's "Time of the Gypsies" is truly a film unlike any other. It is, for all intents and purposes, a coming of age story. However, due largely in part to the film's cultural context and use of magical realism, Kusturica manages to communicate a much more complex story.The film revolves around Perhan, a young Gypsy on the brink of adulthood with telekinetic abilities. His life is deeply rooted in struggles of poverty and family. Somewhat idealistic in nature, Perhan seems determined to escape these struggles, although he goes about it in a way that really only serves to perpetuate them. He doesn't know any better, and how could he? Herein lies one of the film's most devastating themes- even with good effort and intention, life has a cyclical nature. So, just as Perhan lives without a mother, so will his child- and worse. This sort of inescapable, cyclical fate is prevalent in the film and is, likely, a critique of life behind the Iron Curtain.The experience of watching "Time of the Gypsies" is akin to dreaming while awake, and not always in a pleasant way. The film's use of magical realism reflects the bizarre daily realities for Perhan, Azra, and the other characters- all of whom are struggling just to survive in the Third World. Kusturica's interesting juxtaposition of comedy, magical realism, and tragedy gives the viewer a taste of how confused and challenged these characters (and their real life counterparts) must be all the time. All things considered, this is one of the most unique films I have ever seen. It is not an easy viewing experience, as it requires one to endure brutal tragedy, betrayal, and loss all wrapped up in a dreamscape of magical realism. And admittedly, at times, it can be esoteric. However, I found "Time of the Gypsies" to be incredibly powerful and definitely recommend it to anyone interested in truly inspired International Cinema.

bnl1195 Kusterica fuses together both real situations and bizarre ones to create magical realism. This movie takes us on a journey through the protagonist (Perhan's) life and ultimately gypsy culture. This movie depicts the madness of life and the ugliness that comes from adulthood. We watch young, innocent, honest, and good hearted Perhan evolve into a lying, stealing, heartless mafia boss. Although this is a very extreme case it does symbolize the loss of innocence that occurs with growing up. As we grow it's almost like we are programmed to learn how to lie, become numb to others and ultimately lose our "black and whiteness". As we grow, we start to become a shade of gray-- no longer do we wear our hearts on our sleeves. We say what we don't actually feel, we deceive, we become motivated by materialistic items and act out of self interest. Through this move, Kusterica brings so much value to the saying "ignorance is bliss". To me, this story has an underlying cyclical theme of fate-- we as human beings, cannot escape the process of growing up that hardens our adolescent light hearts. The only thing that I didn't particularly enjoy about this film was the loud noises that occurred through out the film, but I assume that being an American viewer I was just not used to this type of style.Overall, I love the message that I took from this movie. It truly is a beautifully bizarre take on a coming of age story. Kusterica is like Fellini with a dark side.