Wonder Woman

Wonder Woman

2011 ""
Wonder Woman
Wonder Woman

Wonder Woman

4.2 | en | Adventure

It's the modern day, and being Wonder Woman is complicated. Diana is leading a triple life - running a large corporation out of costume and fighting crime in costume in one identity.

View More
AD

WATCH FREEFOR 30 DAYS

All Prime Video
Cancel anytime

Watch Now
4.2 | en | Adventure , Fantasy , Action | More Info
Released: November. 07,2011 | Released Producted By: , Country: Budget: 0 Revenue: 0 Official Website:
Synopsis

It's the modern day, and being Wonder Woman is complicated. Diana is leading a triple life - running a large corporation out of costume and fighting crime in costume in one identity.

...... View More
Stream Online

The movie is currently not available onine

Cast

Pedro Pascal , Adrianne Palicki , Elizabeth Hurley

Director

Colin Watkinson

Producted By

,

AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

All Prime Video Movies and TV Shows. Cancel anytime.

Watch Now

Trailers & Images

Reviews

jthedron Overall, not a bad turn for a pilot. The fight scenes were better than anything from the Lynda Carter series (nothing against the orig. TV WW). Palicki in the role is definitely tougher, ballsier, but at times angry (maybe because she really misses Steve). The only real problems were the 3 persons in one Diana, I mean really, and why bring back Steve Trevor, the love of her life, only for Diana to discover he's hitched. What a bad move. Having Steve around as her new/old boyfriend, might have softened that angry look in her eyes. Anyway, I hope someone gives Palicki another look for any TV series they might consider for the WB.
Blueghost I think bought maybe all of three Wonder Woman comics as a pre-teen boy. The character had always been around, but seemed kind of hokey wearing a circus bustier and flying an "invisible jet" (reminiscent of a Lear jet configuration). Her stories were kind of plain, and so sort of gave up on them and moved on in life ... or as much as a pre-teen youth could.I am told that Wonder Woman, as originally conceived, was a subversive attempt to satiate sexual bondage fantasies from the 1930s and 1940s. Eh, if so then I'm out of touch, but WW does tend to use a rope to get the truth out of men. And given her costume and liberal use of a rope, one is left to wonder if the social scientists writing about this comic book character don't have something there.Which leads one to ... "wonder", what it is about Wonder Woman that keeps people coming back for more, and for the owners of the current property to keep trying to reinvent her. I mean are there really that many men out there with fantasies regarding this kind of heroine? I'm not so sure.David Kelley writes about a woman who presents comic book superhero behavior in a real world for what it is; unlawful. But we often give a pass to vigilantes in costume because they have abilities us mere mortals do not, and gallivant in colorful circus performer costumes.I'm not really sure what the twist on this new Wonder Woman was supposed to do, but the directorial style and overall presentation, as professional as it is, did strike me as a touch predictable. That is as a male who read comic books like a lot of other boys when he was younger, and knowing female oriented TV programming, this presentation seemed to try to break the traditional mold by breaking what otherwise might have been the suspected expectations of the audience, but in doing so, winds up being almost a kind of cliché' unto itself.That is to say Wonder Woman is the everyday independent woman who not only trounces over-muscled male foes, but snuggles with her cat at the end of the day with a bowl of ice cream--no doubt some popular contemporary brand too. Not a bad angle to take for this attempted re-imagining of her, but I think the problem here isn't that Wonder Woman takes a lot of liberties with the law in her attempt to enforce the law, it's with the character's genesis itself. And by that I mean she was always a kind of sexual invention from the 1940s.I mean, what do you do with that? The best you can, I suppose. I think the tone set by this production teams is okay. WW is a bit over the top in terms of how she gets people to talk (I think Linda Carter's version is a bit more true to form of the G-rated WW a lot of people expect), but is otherwise palatable. Me, I think the series in the 70s with Linda Carter was campy, but inventive, and because it tried to stick with the character's roots, was fun in its own special way, if predictable as well. This series attempts to resuscitate a very 1940's character for a 2016 audience, and I think giving WW's character a kind of violent streak countered by her ordinary single white female private life, is perhaps the dual edged sword that was needed, but may have been over the top with two scenes. In short, I think mister Kelley misread the scale of violence WW fans were willing to accept from their favorite bondage character. It's one thing to challenge another male in personal combat, and defeat them. Every male knows this. But it's another to press your advantage against those less capable. And I think that's the only fault this show made.Otherwise I thought it was okay and in fact entertaining. I'm not sure it's something I would watch regularly, but I think a certain male and female audience could really go for this type of show. I'm sorry it wasn't picked up and finished, and I'm sorry it didn't lead to a TV series because I think it would have been successful.If you see a copy, give it a shot, but remember, it's not for kids.
curtis martin They got the look right. They got the action right. I like the actress. I like the costumes. The rest? Dang, how weird! Plot and dialog no better than the 1970s show--really, really bad. And a real fascist slant to the whom thing. And wonder woman seems to change size pretty drastically throughout. Sometime she looks very amazon tall and imposing, other times not. And her voice sometimes drifts into SoCal valley-speak tones. Anyway...the look of the actress and costume and how she looked kicking add worked. But that's about it. The whole thing seemed kind of ill thought out and a bit rushed. This was from a major producer known mainly for his writing?
lee-anthony well the version I saw was pre productions and had a few wires not having been taken out and the cg of the rope was awe full and unfinished but all in all it was great I have to reply to Alerict0 and his comments about her being a Nazis and the fact that all dc characters never see themselves above the law errrrrrr wrooooong, Batman breaks the law and breaks heads all the time. So too does dare devil the film of which I still think is the best super hero movie out there. We are not in the 70s any more with a wonder woman just being a female superman yes superman is the boy scout which i don't think will ever change but even he had his dark moments. This is a re imagining of wonder woman and saying that she thinks them guilty before proved innocent I don't think that was the case at all everyone she went after she was 100% the villain was a villain. I mean 20 guys in a room coming at you with iron bars and the like how much more proof do you need? The action scenes were great too and you could see what was happening as opposed to Arrow's quick cuts and shaky camera. Really got a feel for how strong and sassy wonder woman was at first I had to giggle seeing her run down the road in her costume but after seeing Palicki sell the character good job :-)