Leofwine_draca WORK is one of the early silent shorts that Charlie Chaplin made before he'd quite got to grips with his famous 'little tramp' character. In this one he plays a painter and decorater who gets put upon by his boss before wreaking havoc in a typical house. Despite the short length I found this film dragged a little, with lots of scenarios featuring repetitive slapstick gags and jokes which go on and on and on. Saying that, there are some fun incidents involving a bucket of wallpaper glue and an explosive stove, and Chaplin works hard at all the pratfalls and jokes, so it's still enjoyable.

CitizenCaine Chaplin again edited, wrote, directed, and starred in this film where Chaplin plays a put upon paper hanger. Chaplin has fun poking jabs at authority figures and upper-crust hypocrisy in a film more heavily plotted than his other films of the era. The film opens with visual gags of Chaplin pulling a work cart with his boss literally cracking the whip and the difficulties he faces. They arrive at a home of a snobby husband bossing his wife around. Once the wall-hanging paste is mixed, Chaplin plays with it like a musical instrument, creating havoc in the house while taking a shine to the maid (played by Edna Purviance). Chaplin's boss is literally up to his ears with wall-hanging paste (which appears more like plaster), the stove explodes several times, and the wife's secret lover (hilariously played by Leo White), dressed like a 19th century dandy, arrives much to the chagrin of the snobby husband. More chaos ensues as Chaplin, his boss, the lover, and the couple participate in a melange of slapstick punctuated by the husband firing shots, the stove exploding, and the house's interior reduced to rubble. The film is well edited, paced, and directed with a balance of plot and slapstick. **1/2 of 4 stars.

Michael DeZubiria By this point in his career, Chaplin had almost fully developed the character of the little tramp, although he had not come close to perfecting the performances or truly refining his personality. But the character that the world soon came to know and love is clearly there by this point. This is one of the more complex stories for Chaplin's earliest work, with several story lines taking place simultaneously and coming together at the end. The thing about slapstick is that so often it's only funny once, and sometimes even only mildly amusing that one time. The problem is that when you know what's going to happen, you can see the actor setting up for whatever sight gag is coming, even if it's only a slight indication of movement or preparation, but Chaplin was so good at it that in a film like this there are numerous sight gags and stunts that you can rewind and watch two or three times and they're still good. Chaplin had a natural style about him that looks like what we're watching isn't even a performance. This film, simply titled Work, has plenty of amusing and memorable gags, particularly the wallpapering and the exploding stove. The end of the film is very high energy and even action packed, but it still strikes me as a bit of a descent into chaos. It's the kind of punching and kicking and throwing and falling and swinging and breaking stuff that we see a lot of in the Keystone films but that I feel tend to get boring after a while. Then again, it's not until about 22 minutes into this 24 minute film that Chaplin first kicks a man over backwards by shoving his foot into the man's chest, so clearly other elements of storytelling are becoming more important to him....

MartinHafer This isn't a great short movie by Chaplin standards, though compared to many other slapstick films of the time, it's pretty good. In fact, the operative word for this film is "slapstick", as this movie has a larger than normal for Chaplin amount of pratfalls. Falling, hitting, exploding ovens and buckets of wallpaper paste getting tossed about is pretty much all this film is about from start to finish. This is funny, I guess, but it certainly doesn't look like a film about "the Little Tramp". And, now that I think about it, it looks like an early Chaplin film fused with a Three Stooges short. Kids will probably like it, but devoted fans of Chaplin will probably feel a tad disappointed.