Innsmouth_Apprentice There is a lot of information here. Interestingly, Mr. Schama skips the Holocaust almost entirely - I assume because that topic is already familiar enough to most potential viewers. "The Story of Jews" covers the multiple ordeals that the "People of the Book" who created the original Abrahamic religion - Judaism - had had to endure during the 1st millennium BCE while still in their homeland. We then follow the Jews who had departed from the Levant to seek better life elsewhere on their dramatic journeys around Europe, Africa, and the New World.Coupled with own Googling, the series' viewing has provided me with a deeper understanding of the issues surrounding the Jewish people.My short summary would be that the story of the Jews shows how much nonsense has historically been floating around in the collective human psyche. I am not excluding the Jews from this critique. I am not even excluding myself.8/10.

edwagreen Though the first two chapters of this documentary were rather dry in taste, the documentary itself got far better as we began to approach modern times.Even Simon Scharma, the narrator, seemed to come more alive as the film went on.This was extremely informative to watch. Let us remember that for example, Jews were expelled from England circa 1270.The Jewish people have always used assimilate to integrate themselves into society. Sadly, we saw that this certainly hasn't succeeded and we saw the obvious examples of the Nazi era with its resulting holocaust, and even the Dreyfuss Affair in France as an anti- semitic adventure on the part of the French people.We saw how our Jewish people have attempted to use music and culture in the assimilation process. Interesting to learn how the song Over the Rainbow is based on a Yiddish lullaby.

enginquiry **spoiler alert**I found it to be an excellent overview of the story of the Jews. I agree with some of the other reviewers that the scope was rather limited -- it did not include many of the Jewish groups that are scattered throughout the world. If it did, I think it would have to be a much, much longer series, because there is truly a lot to be said.Having said that, where I disagree with some reviews, is that I think he explains very well why the Jews have survived as a people, alluding not only to the adaptation of its religion to the nomadic lifestyle (i.e. the memory of the spoken word, the work of Moses Mendelsohnn, the ghettos (for example, in Venice); the Talmud and its portable and philosophically-malleable nature; and the openness with which certain countries and communities allowed Jews to enter, collaborate and prosper. I think a reviewer mentioned that it felt as though the host wanted the viewer to feel guilt. I did not get that feeling at all. I think he wanted the viewer to understand that, unfortunately, the sad state of the Jewish story, "paranoia confirmed by history", cannot be denied. I also strongly agree that Herzl's notion of Zionism and its true meaning has been well defined and brought into more proper context by the host and by what Herzl saw happen in Europe, including France (e.g. Dreyfus). Namely, that Jews were still being treated like vermin for being Jews, in spite of assimilation. The idea of Jews needing a nation makes a lot of sense -- at least it *made* a lot of sense in the world of Herzl -- and this Zionism made even *more* sense to Jews during WW2. So, as defined by Jews needing this home, like any nation, it is in that sense a noble endeavor that, had it happened earlier, may have saved Jews from prosecution. Though I have yet to find a Jew who wouldn't trade the lives lost for Israel.While there is debate about Israel/Palestine and origins and land, I think it would be fair to say though, that if we all came back to where we came from originally, Saudi Arabia would have to give part of Medina to the Jews, which of course will never happen. So, because we don't necessarily come back to where we originated. It has to be, as they say, a world of adaptation. But that's where this stops being a review and becomes a personal opinion. Anyway, great introduction but definitely, DEFINITELY begs for further research. And I'm sure it was not meant to be the end-all-be-all of historic series. I would like to see one on Russian Jews sometime, as well as Mountain Jews.

huguespt This is a very interesting Mocmentry of the Jewish history over the years as per Mr Schama. I enjoyed the history of this series however by the third episode I found Mr. Schama to be the, well "everyone in history has beaten up Jews", if Mr. Schama could be a little more reportive rather then, it seems asking anyone watching this program for an apologie. I do not condone war, genocide of any race or religion however I think a TV series should report the facts and not make the viewer want to switch off because it is a world that beats Jews. The first 2 episodes were not like the third as in they were factual and good reporting were as by the third episode, I found it more of a political/religious statement rather than an unbiased reporter giving the facts with passion rather someone that realistically wants to petition people to aplogise for the horrors of the past. Mr Schama needs to stay a reporter or a protester and reflect this in his Mocumentaries. Worth watching. It was informative. I say Mocumetrey rather than Documentary as to me a reporter of a Documentary is un- biased, Mr, Schama is far from unbiased but to me asks for an apologie from the viewer. There is so much horror in human past and even present of many peoples but for a documentary this needs to be unbiased. As I have said worth watching if by the time you get to the third episode, I wont watch anymore from Mr. Schama unless he can be a reporter rather than a person too close to the subject matter.