Laakbaar I thought the footage of Mecca was amazing. I've always wanted to see this in detail, and IMAX was the right medium for showing the grand scale of it all. I'm not Muslim, or even a believer, but I was moved by the force and depth of this very outward, visible and geographical expression of Islam. Thank you to everyone who brought this to the screen. My only complaint is that these scenes were far too brief, and perhaps there was not enough explanation about what we were seeing.However, the desert scenes, and the story of Ibn Battuta's journey, did not work for me. Perhaps the film was too short to do it justice. The writing, acting and plot in this part of the movie felt unchallenging and unsophisticated to me. I don't feel I really learned that much about Ibn Battuta.Was this part of the movie about the journey or about the desert? I feel the desert in general does not really lend itself to IMAX. I also feel that if an IMAX movie is to be made about the North African desert, it should present the viewer with mind-blowing and never-before-seen scenes of the desert. This movie didn't do that.Most IMAX movies don't have much of a plot. They tend to take documentary form. This movie couldn't decide whether it was a documentary about Mecca or a 14th century travel adventure film. I wish the filmmakers had made a straightforward film about Mecca, explaining in more detail what we were watching, including the meaning and logistical nightmare that must be involved. However, I suppose that if they had done this, they wouldn't have been allowed to film it at all.However, despite my comments, I don't think you should miss this movie. Its brief images of Mecca and what happens there make it worth sitting through the rest.

Ebonyks I saw this film and was blown away by the technical shortcomings, more specifically, how out of focus this entire film is. I'm not a regular Imax viewer, and this may be a very common problem, but it seemed as if virtually none of the film was in focus. I'd say less than 20-30% of footage had a clear focal point, and that was typically less than 10-20% of the total screen. The only exceptions were scenes involving CGI maps.The topic was interesting, my knowledge of the hajj was limited prior to seeing this, and the film created the 14th century cities with style, but technical issues impacted my enjoyment of this film. It's a shame too, there are so many seemingly beautiful desert landscapes in this movie.

Artemis Rider Disappointing. Really. From all the interesting, adventurous and cool things that happened in Ibn Batutta's life none were used. An average person will have a distorted view of Ibn Batutta. If I hadn't read his Book I would too. I feel that the creators of this movie cleverly used his name to sell a documentary on Hajj. Even there too - Hajj is just sloppily touched on and the movie abruptly ends. There is no real in-sight into how Muslims used to live or how Ibn Batutta lived - you go in knowing nothing and come out knowing less. I hear that a lot of 'research' was done but apart from the footage of the Ka'ba (which you just need permission and a camera for) I don't see any of it. There was so many obvious glitches (like every man in the Great Caravan having mustaches instead of beards and the women walking around with their hair loose under small scarves - clearly extras from the eastern film industry and in no way properly portraying the style of Muslims couple of hundred years ago.)Anything you saw in a Moroccan film you'll see here.I don't know what research these creators are talking about. From a plot point of view this movie was bland. We see Zinoune travel through the boring, empty,dry desert most of the time. There was no real substance or story-line. I was expecting more considering how exciting the trailer and synopsis were made out to be. The only good thing is that Muslims aren't portrayed as mass-murderers and the Hajj has accurate details (we'll pretend we never saw everyone coming up from Sijda without the Imaam saying 'Allaah-hu-Akbar'). In short - a highly-pumped, overrated, pointless movie with no idea what it wants to be or where its going. A loose cannon. I can't believe that we're supposed to believe that they actually did research about Ibn Batutta, ancient Arabia or Hajj. You'd have to know absolutely nothing about Islaam to watch this film - if that's you, then go for it, but if you know even a little bit - take a pass. Read his book; it was way better.

Anthony Journey to Mecca tells the story of a young lawyer from Morroco - Ibn Battuta who traveled from Morocco to Mecca and later to China about 700 years ago. He traveled more than 4,000 kilometers over desert by himself, dealing with bandits, wars, and the Sahara on the way.The images in this HUGE Imax film of the Sahara, Mecca and Arab culture are stunning and memorable. I have to say it was one of the first IMAX film where I really felt moved (along with Shackleton's Antarctic Adventure). The explanation of the Haj are clear and informing.This was apparently a very hard movie to film. They had to get approval by the King of Saudi to shoot it. Also none of the crew were allowed to view the Kabba so they had to hire and train a local crew specially for the task.The result is a stunning experience of a movie. Excellent story, excellent movie… Highly recommended