2bhogan3 Out in fifty is one of those films where you know the actors were just doing it to get paid, however this film is a classic tale. This is a tale of murder and revenge, of lust and adultery and of second chances. Scott Leet is excellent in the lead role, and although Christina Applegate's character could have been played by anyone, her character is symbolic of the idea that we all deserve a second chance. Raymond Frye (Leet) receives a second chance, but it is taken away by the drunken and vengeful Jack Bracken (Rourke). Some of the cuts and camera angles in this film are quite interesting and lead you to wonder what may have been possible for this film with a bigger budget. Ultimately this is a film that will not please everyone, but when watched closely, can appeal to even the most jaded critic.

lissa-rocks Wow, it starts bad and ends even worse. From Mickey's god awful acting to Bojess's embarrassing outfits. This movie was intended to be hard hitting and Witty as well as comical, but the only thing funny about this movie is the fact that somebody actually produced it, what a wast of money. Mickey plays a weed crazed cop who just can't leave the poor misunderstood ex-con alone. Unfortunately, that description is a tad bit ironic,as weed is the only thing that would make this movie OK. The best part of this movie is the steaming hottie Peter Greene, who plays the Mickey's cop partner. Over all, this movie is just bad, don't wast your time with it.

Pete-135 This movie is about a young man, played by Scott Leet that accidentally kills a woman while he is in the act of a one-night stand. Unfortunately for him, the woman he kills is married to a crazed cop, played by Mickey Rourke. After Leet gets released from prison after serving seven years, he meets up with a married couple and he gets involved in a love triangle of sorts. As a subplot, Rourke is hell bent on getting revenge on Leet. I could go on, but it's really not worth the effort.In all fairness, the above synopsis actually sounds better than the film plays. Two words that come to mind while watching this movie are "stupid" and "amateurish".This movie was written, directed, and produced by Scott Leet and Bojesse Christopher. And as if their talent was still not being fully tapped, they also play the two main characters in the film.Well, the story isn't very compelling, and they make the film worse by their horrible acting.I guess Leet and Christopher raised enough money to hire a few professional actors that are "guns for hire" at this point in their career. This includes Mickey Rourke, Christina Applegate, and Peter Greene. All of them have minor roles (fortunately for them, unfortunately for the viewers).Although Mickey Rourke has top billing in this production, he is merely a supporting character. In spite of the thin material he has to work with, Rourke delivers a very good performance.The only thing of interest is to see how striking the bad acting is relative to the good acting in the film. Amateurs and professionals should really never mix.Bottom-line; avoid this movie at all costs. I would give this a solid 2 out of 10.

nad-12 Out in fifty. No! More than 50 minutes of boring scenes. This movie did not in any way impress me and my friends. The plot is hard to pick up and the scenes are practically flat and bad. A guy gets imprisoned for accidentally killing a hooker whom he had sex wearing an underwear. And what's another guy doing in that same room? Sightseeing! The next scenes were all boring and nowhere to go. If you haven't got a thing to do, don't pick this movie up in the video store. Just go home and watch the latest news on TV or better yet watch a cartoon film.