Rampage: President Down

Rampage: President Down

2016 "This Bill will not be vetoed"
Rampage: President Down
Watch on
Rampage: President Down
Watch on

Rampage: President Down

4.7 | 1h39m | en | Action

Bill Williamson is back, alive and well and doing a recon mission around D.C. This time he wants to cause a major population disruption within the USA which result in devastating consequences reverberating throughout the world. His new mission this time to bring down The President of the United States and his Secret Service detail. Bill brings with him all the freak-in havoc and acidity of the previous 2 movies.

View More
Watch Now
AD

WATCH FREEFOR 30 DAYS

All Prime Video
Cancel anytime

Watch Now
4.7 | 1h39m | en | Action , Thriller , Crime | More Info
Released: August. 26,2016 | Released Producted By: Event Film Distribution , Country: United States of America Budget: 0 Revenue: 0 Official Website:
Synopsis

Bill Williamson is back, alive and well and doing a recon mission around D.C. This time he wants to cause a major population disruption within the USA which result in devastating consequences reverberating throughout the world. His new mission this time to bring down The President of the United States and his Secret Service detail. Bill brings with him all the freak-in havoc and acidity of the previous 2 movies.

...... View More
Stream Online

Stream with Netflix

Cast

Brendan Fletcher , Steve Baran , Ryan McDonell

Director

Vava Renata

Producted By

Event Film Distribution ,

AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

All Prime Video Movies and TV Shows. Cancel anytime.

Watch Now

Trailers & Images

Reviews

rmmoul If I could give this 0 stars then I would. The crappy political message of the movie is shoved down your throat from the first few seconds and from there it just gets worse. The acting in this movie is worse than some high-school musicals that I've seen and the overall production and shaky (literally looks like someone who's never held a camera and who also has weak arms) camera work looks worse than most youtube videos. I love action movies, even when the story line is terrible, but this just drags on and may be one of the worse films I've watched in several years.
johnkenerson This movie was a complete waste of film. Uwe Boll has got to be the worst director since Ed Wood, and the fact that he and his "star" wrote this abortion will solidify the fact that he sucks as a writer too.This movie is nothing but a leftist propaganda wet dream (the irony being that most leftists are afraid of guns). Bill Williamson comes as nothing but a petulant punk, someone who thinks he has it all figured out, but is literately nothing more than a retard in a suit of ballistic armor. The suits that greenlit this movie should have the crap kicked out of them. The fact that Boll has a career, even after failure upon failure is a testament to the lack of creativity in Hollywood. This movie fails on all levels, storytelling, directing, action, political commentary, social commentary. There is not a single redeeming thing in this movie. I wish I could sue the filmmakers to get the half hour of my life I spent watching this piece of garbage back. If I could give less than one star, I most certainly would.Spend your time watching something else. This movie sucks.
Erik There are many movies that can tip the tables in the favor one company over another. This is definitely not one of those movies.Where to begin, how about the fact that the protagonist is a terrorist but is apparently portrayed as the good guy. The movie is very anti-rich and assumes that the majority must resort to violence in order to have a say in what happens. Everyone believes the rich can only get rich because they have broken the rules to do it. However someone can get rich because they make something like the safety pin.The production value is terrible, the reused the news set for the FBI HQ. That would be fine if it weren't for the fact that the set was terrible to begin with. They didn't even change a single thing about it. And the news itself doesn't come close to something that can convince you it is an actual news network.In addition the guns don't sound like guns when they fire and when there is an explosion you don't see any damage on someone who was caught in it. The same holds true for bullets Many thing aren't addressed, such as how the protagonist was able to get things such as land mines and rpgs.The acting IS something to write home about though, but not in a good way. It is slow and dull and I don't know if this was their idea or not, but it seems like they tried to spice it up with excessive swearing. Seriously, how many F-bombs do you need? Anyway, the film ends with riots in the streets as people are killing anyone who is doing better than them (they say the rich, but no one looked like an aristocratic). Furthermore, they blame it all on "Right Wing Anarchists." It also uses the stereotype of a white bald guy with a gun as one of these terrorists.I would continue more and try and take apart this film piece by piece but 1,000 words isn't enough to tell you how bad this movie is. Plus I don't want to dwell on this movie any longer as it literally gave me a head ache.If I had a physical copy of this movie I would put it in the burn barrel, light it on fire, pour gasoline on it, light the flames on fire, take it's ashes and then burn those. I would then take the ashes' ashes, put them in a jar, send them to the director and writer and burn those.So to sum up: I don't like this movie.
AJ598 I've enjoyed the first two movies in this series incredibly.However this particular film ends in utter nonsense.It is a movie about an extreme left-wing radical and yet, they make a bold claim in the final scenes regarding right-wing terrorists which completely negates the entire premise of the film. Right when I was about to finish watching, satisfied with the content, they throw this statement into the film which completely destroys the continuity of the story.That being said, if you would like to see a movie about a terrorist democrat, it's a good watch. Far from the quality of the previous two however.