emmaclarke781 The thing that struck me most after watching this was how eerily normal it all was. Not Ian Brady (Sean Harris) His behaviour screamed dangerous individual. But everything else. This drama depicts so well the minute details of everyday, boring life. The conversations, the slang, the setting just reminded me of people i knew and places I've been. It made the eventual reveal of the crimes all the more effective. It reminds you this can happen anywhere and be anyone you know. The show has great attention to detail and 1960s Working class England is brought to life amazingly well. You feel like you are actually there. The houses and streets are grim and so are the people and their life's: Teenagers married with babies, young men struck on the dole, violent men ignored and semi accepted by everyone. It doesn't strike me as a time of innocence shattered by the Moor Murders but a time full of narrow-mindedness with a simmering undercurrent of brutality. The cast all play their roles fantastically and the script is excellent. No character is completely sympathetic and no character (with the exception of Brady) is one dimensional . Even Hindley, in a controversial move is portrayed as someone who loves her sister fiercely and is capable of compassion for her niece and dogs. All in all, an excellent sensitive, realistic portrayal of the banality of evil and the extraordinary aspects of normality .

Andy Croft This film was portrayed in a very strong and parsonage way. The cast played daunting characters with tremendous effort. This movie is chilling in the fact that it is still on the mind of many people. I only rated it a 6 as I thought maybe more could have been put across about how these two absolute animals lived their horrific murderous life's. There may have been some restraints on what could be told.I lived local as a child to these areas and today the mention of Brady and Hindley runs chills through peoples bones.Great film - Great CastA must on the TO WATCH list !

redskiesmaxx Having read most of the literature on the Moors Murders, I was looking forward to seeing this. But when it was over, I was left feeling a bit underwhelmed. Suffice to say, "See No Evil" seems more or less like an extended episode of "Prime Suspect" or "Cracker" set in the 1960s. The story begins in medias res with not a whole lot of context provided for what we're seeing. More often than not, things are awkwardly explained by characters after the fact; and the banal, obvious dialogue tends to emphasize this problem a bit too much.While I was watching I was struck by all of the things that weren't or couldn't be shown in the film (such as the kidnappings of the children and the disposal of their bodies on the moors, as well as the infamous photographs and tape recording of Lesley Ann Downey's torture and murder). These omissions tend to throw the viewer off a bit since there is barely anything that suggests the killers' motivations. Too many important facts and details are mentioned in the past tense, and not enough is dramatized and shown as happening in the present moment — this circuitous approach tends to blunt the impact of the story as a whole.As the psychopath Ian Brady, Sean Harris is a fine actor with an interesting, enigmatic presence, and his performance is more or less adequate. But strangely, he doesn't seem to project enough menace in the role. He scowls and looks pale and ghastly and speaks in a soft-spoken Scots accent — which, to my ears, sounds a little forced and put-on. For the most part (and the limitations of the script may be partly to blame for this), he comes across as an actor merely playing at being a psychopath, rather than a man genuinely unhinged — someone who feels compelled to commit senseless, heinous acts of violence. He is at his most convincing (and scary) when he sees that Dave Smith (Michael McNulty) has given him up to the police, and he flashes his young friend a condescending smirk. Harris is also quite believable when he has a battle of wits with George Costigan, who plays police DCI, Joe Mounsey — giving defiant, insolent non-answers to the detective's incisive, probing questions.As the notorious Myra Hindley, Maxine Peake probably delivers the best performance, but the script seems to undermine and shortchange her character. We never really learn very much about her — such as what her life was like before she met Ian Brady and what attracted her to him, what the dynamic of their relationship was, as well as how her personality changed as a result. We certainly don't learn anything about why she participated in the sadistic murder of young children. The movie also makes the mistake of trying to replicate Myra's infamous 1965 mug shot and it only serves to emphasize that, apart from the clothes and the hair, Maxine Peake really doesn't look that much like the actual person she's portraying.As David Smith, Michael McNulty does indeed look a great deal like the actual person he is meant to be. Although, I got a sense that the writer sanded the rough edges off his character a bit too much — especially Smith's putative alcoholism and spousal abuse — in order to make him more palatable and sympathetic to the audience.Joanne Frogatt plays Maureen Hindley, Myra's kid sister and Dave Smith's shotgun bride, and the film takes her point of view. While the filmmakers were clearly trying to preserve a little taste by maintaining a slight distance from the two killers and their crimes, adopting Maureen's perspective (especially as played by Frogatt) seems a mistake. Indeed, it turns out to be a rather unrevealing vantage point that yields precious little insight about events.Not surprisingly, Frogatt's Maureen turns out to be the sole straight arrow amidst this otherwise unsavory quartet, and the movie seems partly intended as a rehabilitation of both her and David Smith's public image in connection with the murders. Unfortunately, Frogatt is as dull as ditchwater in the role, and with her pasty, angular, dark-haired features and de rigueur beehive hairdo, Frogatt looks like she could be one of Sean Harris' siblings rather than Maxine Peake's. By the end of the movie, despite all of my prior knowledge about the case, I was left feeling just as bewildered and in the dark about everything as Maureen did. With Frogatt's character as the story's center of gravity, the moral sense of the movie seems rather uncertain and hesitant and vaguely apologetic. An earnest, token effort is also made to show the suffering of the relatives of the victims, so as not to run the risk of inadvertently valorizing the two killers. These people — in particular, the actors playing John Kilbride's father and Lesley Ann Downey's mother — often come across more vividly than the two criminals and their close relations do. This aspect of the movie focuses on the efforts of Detective Mounsey and as such, "See No Evil" awkwardly tries to tell two converging stories from two different outside points of view at the same time.In the end, I just didn't feel that this production really did justice to the Moors Murders (pardon the pun). The only time that the grisliness and horror of the killings are really felt is when the police search team digging on Saddleworth Moor retrieves Lesley Ann Downey's body from her grave in the middle of a foggy night. A story like this demands a more detailed narrative context and a stronger viewpoint (even if this necessitates a bit of speculation and guesswork) or it risks wishy-washy banality. This subject would be served by a proper feature film treatment, even though the serial murder genre has practically been done to death in the movies (again, pardon the pun).

Mis Behavin I watched this when it came out and found it an amazing piece of work and kudos to Maxine Peake for shedding her comedy typecast and putting in a truly excellent performance. This programme was not graphic, quite the opposite. What the producers did was concentrate on the everyday lives of Brady and Hindley, showing them to be, (Hindley on face value at least), normal people living normal lives. However, what chills you is that whilst they are going about their routine lives, the viewer knows that behind the scenes they are committing the most appallingly wicked crimes. This is highlighted by conversations held throughout the programme such as a discussion about a newspaper article that Maureen Smith had with her sister regarding the disappearance of Lesley-Ann Downey. One of the slightly controversial aspects of this programme, was the decision to include real photographs within the scenery of the actual children who suffered at the hands of this evil pair. However, this was a clever move because it constantly brought home the very real and shocking subject of the programme. In cases as hideous as this we, quite rightly, hear about the suffering of victims relatives, however See No Evil focused primarily on the destruction of the lives of Hindleys sister and brother-in-law, and God were their lives wrecked. Brady and Hindleys wicked cruelty destroyed many lives and I'm glad this programme was shown because it will all make us pray that Hindley will rot in hell and Brady won't be far behind.