Wuchak RELEASED TO TV IN EARLY 1991 and directed by Mike Robe, "Son of the Morning Star" chronicles the story of George Armstrong Custer (Gary Cole) after the Civil War and to his death at Little Bighorn on June 25, 1876. The story is narrated from the different perspectives of two women: Custer's wife (Rosanna Arquette) and a Cheyenne woman, Kate Bighead (Buffy Sainte-Marie/ Kimberly Guerrero). This was originally shown in two parts on TV 2.5 months after the theatrical release of 1990's "Dances with Wolves." Kevin Costner, the star of "Dances," was even the first choice to play Custer, but he opted for the superior project. Speaking of "Dances with Wolves," "Son of the Morning Star" is very similar in tone, as well as other realistic Westerns of the general era, like "Conagher" (1991). But, despite the gushing of fans, it ain't no "Dances with Wolves." It's just nowhere near as absorbing; and is more akin to semi-tedious history lessons like "Gettysburg" (1993) and "Geronimo: An American Legend" (1993). If the creators would've cut out at least an hour of material it would've made for a more compelling watch, but they HAD to fill out two 2 hour spots (with commercials) to make it a 2-part "mini-series."Still, it's a fairly interesting history lesson and superior to absurd Westerns that tackle the same subject, like "Custer of the West" (1967). Everything leads up to the Battle of Little Bighorn in the last quarter of the movie and it's worth the wait. At a certain point you can see on Custer's face the horror that there were just too many fired-up Indians and he & his men weren't going to make it out alive. It's as if he was thinking: "What the **** did I get us into?" The humbled man was 36 years-old. THE MOVIE RUNS 3 hours 7 minutes and was shot on private property near the Little Bighorn National Monument in Montana close to Billings, where a fort was built for $200,000, and South Dakota at Buffalo Gap and Badlands National Park. ADDITIONAL MAIN CHARACTERS: Crazy Horse (Rodney A. Grant), Capt. Benteen (David Strathairn), Ulysses S. Grant (Stanley Anderson), Gen. Sherman (George Dickerson) and Gen. Philip Sheridan (Dean Stockwell). WRITERS: Evan S. Connell (book) and Melissa Mathison (teleplay). GRADE: B-/C+

Per Johnsen After watching this epic of the so called Battle of the Little Bighorn for the fourth time, I still think this is the film about the event closer to the truth. Better and more accurate than the other films about it put together, even it still much is a Hollywood drama. Althoug this is more of a biographic view of who the person G.A.Custer was, it's good because it gives a comprehensive, duplex and much more objective look on one of the most famous events in American history than other cinematic efforts. Much because the narrator is a Lakota woman,read by Buffy Saint Marie. Still it might would appear more credible if the Lakota woman described it as the Greasy Grass and not Little Bighorn. Perhaps also using Lakota language names on the native leaders would have worked better. I have always missed that actors in epic historical dramas look more like the person they portray. Gary Cole is not the actor I would cast for the Custer role, neither due to his looks or acting performance. On the other hand, Rodney A. Grant as Crazy Horse and in particular Nick Ramus in the small but important part as Red Cloud are as good at they can get. Althoug no picture of Crazy Horse exists, I believe in Grant's appearance, and it's also the first time his cheek wound and the story behind really comes to light. To find anyone with something close to the charisma and looks of Sitting Bull might just be impossible. Aside of that, Wes Studi and not Gordon Tootoosis getting to portray Geronimo in 1993 is more of a mystery. This is so far still the closest anyone did get to describing the Battle of the Little Bighorn in a sincere and objective way, though it may be far from a perfect portrait of the actual main character,George Armstrong Custer.

david david General Custer is one of the most controversial figures in American history. He is perceived by some to be an egotistical, murdering, glory hunting pariah but to others he is almost a saintly figure to whom history has been most unkind. The truth inevitably lies somewhere between the two. Custer was indeed egotistical and also very ambitious, but he most definitely was not a murderer. Custer was a man of his time, a professional 19th century soldier obliged to carry out the duties of his office. No matter what he personally (and a letter exists to prove that Custer was against an Indian war) felt about his orders. Son of the Morning Star makes the mistake many make when dealing with Custer. It places 20th century 'politically correct' sensibilities upon the events of his later years which distort the truth to an alarming degree. Custer did not 'murder' women and children at the Battle of Washita, evidence exists to prove that he did, in fact, prevent soldiers from such acts although many were killed before he could intervene. Custer did not 'leave some of his men to die' after the battle, he was forced to withdraw as a large army of Sioux approached his position and he was ill-equipped to deal with them. Custer was vigorous in his determination for Indian Agencies to supply the reservation tribes with the food etc that they were entitled to, risking his own career in the process. And finally, at the Little Big Horn, he did not go charging in without thought or rationale. He presumed (incorrectly) that the tribes were escaping and, after giving orders to his subordinates which they did not obey, went in pursuit. Unfortunately there were many more Indians to deal with than expected so he held a defensive position and waited for reinforcements which did not come, due to the failure of others. Consequently he and his men were annihilated. Custer was a complex man, something that this film attempts to touch upon but is let down by it's emphasis on debunking anythinhg positive to be said about him. it's about time someone made a 'real' film about Custer. One that portrays his fine record in the Civil War (he is still the youngest ever General in the US army) and how he was an inspiration to his men. How he displayed great tactical knowledge and extreme bravery under fire. People laugh at Errol Flynn's portrayal of 'Saint Custer' and indeed the latter stages of They Died With Their Boots On are laughable, but the depiction of Custer during the Civil War is (although heavily stylised) very accurate. The flamboyant uniform, the cry of 'ride you wolverines!', marching to Garry Owen - this stuff really happened. After the war Custer was given one tawdry job after another by the army. He disgraced himself on more than one occasion and was ultimately court martial-ed, but he performed his duty for his country and should be remembered for the role he played as a winner in the Civil War, not just as the loser at the Little Big Horn. Cinematically, the film is escellent, with good attention to detail and fine staging of the battle scenes. It's a shame it is flawed by a ha'porth of tarred scripting.

Jack_1515 A very good bio-pic as it closely follows the facts. Based upon the Book "Son of the Morningstar" by Evan S. Connell (1984). Gary Cole does a good job in a drama role as opposed to the many comedy roles he's done more recently. The bleakness of the plains and the futility of the events leading up to the Little Bighorn drag the movie down in its tone at times, but then this is a Last Stand saga. It presents the Native American Point of View and presents Custer's demise as a combination of his own folly and bad decisions by the US government. More time could have been spent on Custer's life up to and during the Civil War, he was at Appomattox, received Lee's flag of surrender and was present at the signing of the surrender (and rode away with the table General Lee signed the surrender on!). He remains the US Army's youngest general to date. The movie rather focuses on Custer's life as an Indian fighter.Noted historian Stephen Ambrose (who wrote "Crazy Horse and Custer") supported the possibility that Custer may have fathered a child out of wedlock with an Indian woman, a point covered in the movie and a major plot element. Robert Utley, former superintendent of the Little Bighorn Battlefield, noted a letter in his book "Cavalier in Buckskin" by one of Custer's own officers that asserted such a relationship existed (Capt. Benteen, one of Custer's officers at the Little Bighorn). This is still a debatable point and Custer may have been sterile as a result of acquiring a STD during his West Point Days, according to some historians.