hackraytex
I am glad I did not waste any money of this piece of garbage. I have seen some pretty poor movies but this one takes the cake. I watched it on late night TV sometime in the 70's or 80's. I will never forget that the sound track kept cutting in and out to the point that I checked my TV to see if there was a problem. I don't think too many people in this so called movie went any further and it is sad that some possibly good careers never got off the ground and it is the fault of this movie. I will not go into the number of goofs since I would be up all night. The most glaring goof was you could see people crawling into the monster to be eaten. Rest In Peace, Mr. Savage.
burnadrenaline
This is bad cinema at it's absolute finest. I would recommend this film to anyone who likes comically bad movies and to the average person as well. Within, the first 10 minutes of this film, you will see stock footage of a rocket-launch played in reverse used as an alien spacecraft landing, complete with the REWIND-LINE! The monster itself is laughable, it's not quite as stupid-looking as the one in "Robot Monster" but it's pretty close. You will easily be able to distinguish the people under the monster-suit and even their shoes throughout the movie. Probably the best moment for the monster is when it invades a jazz concert and "absorbs" everybody. I won't ruin that for you though. Seriously, this movie is so bad that it's mind-boggling and entertaining to boot. It is a particularly great watch if you are up really late in the night and don't have to worry about waking anybody up with laughter. I cannot give a Z-Movie a 10 but this kind of movie is why there are B-movie fans like me out there. Don't expect to learn anything but if you watch this you will probably have a pretty good laugh in the process.
stevescott59
SPOILER: The main "Monster" in The Creeping Terror racks up a pretty impressive body count despite it's lack of speed.The "Monster" looks like it just walked off line from a Chinese New Year's parade and moves with all the speed of a lame turtle or a government worker getting paid by the hour. The only things in this movie that couldn't outrun the "Monster" are a rock and a tree. The only way a person could get caught by the "Monster" is if they ran into a tree or tripped over a rock and knocked themselves out.The only time I rooted for the "Monster" to show up was in the "Dance Hall" scene. If the darn thing could have moved faster, we wouldn't have to endure the mind-numbing music that seemed to have the same few notes looped over and over again as the girl in the skin-tight gold pants gyrated on.(Taken from my show RETERO MOVIE REVIEW on spreaker.com and iHeartRadio. A different review can be found on "Oklahoma & The Movies" on spreaker.com)
Anders Twetman
I have heard somewhere that an important rule in film making is "show, don't tell" but the people who made this seems to have gotten it backwards because this i a clear case of tell, don't show, so much so that the narrator is even telling us the dialog of the characters. I barely consider this to be a film, its is more akin to an audio book, with some moving pictures in the background. What makes it even worse is that the narrator explains more or less all the things that could be inferred from the action or said in dialog, but does not explain some things that are less than self evident.Other than that, the movie is slow paced, poorly executed and rather silly, just like many other monster movies from the 60's. Normally, a movie like that would at least end up in the so-bad-it's-funny category but the overuse of narration makes this thing thoroughly frustrating to watch.
AD
