JohnHowardReid Producers: H.G. Inglis and J. Lee-Thompson. An Associated British picture, made at the Associated British Elstree Studios, England. Copyright 1956 by Associated British Pictures Corp. No trace of any U.S. release. U.K. release through Associated British-Pathé: 22 April 1957. Australian release through Warner Bros Pictures: 20 November 1958. 9,413 feet. 104 minutes.SYNOPSIS: Susie Dean is a young, talented singer and dancer, who is determined to become a great star, but the touring company in which she works, "The Dinky Doos", far from setting the world alight, is on the point of closing down. Then three strangers enter Susie's life and convince her to try again. The new company, christened "The Good Companions", sets to work to put together a new show.COMMENT: As the 1933 "Good Companions" is one of my favorite films, I know that my readers will not expect me to like, let alone endorse this version. The story line is exactly the same — omitting of course many of the brightest touches and embellishments, whilst at the same time substituting the original's lively songs by parades of musical rubbish so unmemorable that even the film's producers made absolute no attempts to market them with disc jockeys.As for the players in this tedious "revival", let me quote the Monthly Film Bulletin: "Janette Scott, though conceivably a Dinky Doo, hardly convinces as a potential West End star." Hardly is exactly right! Aside from the principals, I will admit that some of the support artists do turn in some engaging portrayals: Bobby Howes, Rachel Roberts, Mona Washbourne, Thora Hird, Anthony Newley. But are they worth sitting through the rest of "The Good Companions"?

malcolmgsw If you have seen the original 1933 version of the Good Companions then you will understand why I say that this is a vastly inferior remake.True it is in colour,but if anything it detracts rather than adds to the film.In any event by the time this film was$ made concert parties had virtually died out.The two leads are very poor.Jeanette Scott cannot sing or dance which makes her appearance rather pointless.John Fraser is an inadequate leading man.The film differs from the original in a number of ways,all to its own disadvantage.There is the tacked on show at the end which is truly dreadful and represents all that is worst in fifties British musicals.So not surprising that in the final credits it is the dancers who take the top credits.Definitely not one of Associated British Pictures better efforts

a.lampert I'm not familiar with J B Priestley's book of The Good Companions so I can only comment on this 1957 British musical film as a stand alone feature. I have no idea how this fared at the box office but as it was made at a time after Rock 'n' Roll had already made it's mark, I do wonder why it was considered a good idea. We never really made many good musicals compared to the might of America and this creaky effort is just another disappointment, in spite of me hoping for more. I had been tempted to watch it, seeing the name of that fine actor Eric Portman heading the cast, and indeed he is probably the best actor on board with some sharp lines and his strong personality. Sadly, the support isn't as good. This is basically a music hall scenario, made at a time long after music hall had faded away, replaced as I say by rock 'n' roll and TV, the year of release was 1957 so they should have known better. Choice of director is odd in retrospect, being J. Lee Thompson, known for his thrillers and adventure films and he did make some very good ones, including Ice Cold in Alex, Tiger Bay and The Guns of Navarone and who ended his career helming nine pictures with old Stone Face Charles Bronson, so a musical was an oddity in his career. The songs such as they are seem rather weak and Janette Scott (Thora Hird's daughter) who was just coming to maturity is sweet enough as a lead in a Debbie Reynolds sort of way, but unfortunately lacks the zest and talent of Debbie Reynolds. Lots of small character parts do add interest, not least from Joyce Grenfell, Anthony Newley, Shirley Ann Field, Melvyn Hayes and Janette Scott's mum, Thora Hird. Hugh Griffith, a fine Oscar winning actor (Ben Hur) is wasted in a weak part. Celia Johnson of Brief Encounter fame doesn't fare much better as the lady who saves the touring troupe, the Dinky Doos and changes the name to The Good Companions. Could have been better. Another film I saw recently, Harry Secombe's 'Davy', covering exactly the same material about failed touring troupes in music hall I found more satisfying.

didi-5 This remake of the thirties Jessie Matthews/John Gielgud musical has a lot of charm due to its lovely colour, excellent songs, and a strong cast (good roles for Celia Johnson, Eric Portman, Joyce Grenfell, Hugh Griffith, Bobby Howes, Rachel Roberts, John Fraser and of course Jeanette Scott and her mother Thora Hird; smaller showy roles for Anthony Newley and John Le Mesurier). The last few musical numbers towards the end of the film match many of Hollywood musical efforts around the same time, but the fact that the film is British gives it a heart and a sense of fun sometimes lacking in American polish.