imhockey lol...was this movie a joke??I watched first 10 minutes b/c I wanted to see a train wreck. I watched next 10 minutes because I was so shocked some people buy into this sort of thing. At the 21 minute mark I decided at I had seen enough of the accident; time to hit the gas and get out...I will now do my best to never remember it.Why is there no zero on the vote/rating?

themysteryhighfive This movie takes quotes out of context from its scientific experts, and misleads viewers.The Ice crystal bit is my favorite BS one. http://www.csicop.org/specialarticles/show/a_grain_of_truth_recreati ng_dr._emotos_rice_experimentBasically the whole film is shouting science at you with peppered non science beliefs peppered in between. In other words this is FOX news the movie.: SCIENCE! our cult beliefs (whispered) SCIENCE!This is a good article on the movie as a whole, and all it's issues: http://www.salon.com/2004/09/16/bleep_2/So in closing if you have a few hours to kill, because this is a long mind melt then go for it. But don't buy the snake oil this movie is peddling.

arjenoldenhuis ...it is easy to question the speculation in the movie and point your finger at all the things that are not true. But in fact it shows your own strong believe in the importance of pure science. But what is pure science? That word is too abstract. In this case, pure scientific truth is based on mathematics. In pure science, if the mathematics are right, something is true till its proved wrong. Do you think that's a good approach on the truth? It gets more difficult when the movie tickles some of your own crazy thoughts and ideas about the Universe, which you already had when you where a child. A little bit hypnotized under influence of alpha- wave music and the easy- listening tone of voices, for me, the movie what the Bleep do we know, was a spiritual journey. I think when you approach this movie only in a scientific way, you get lost in a veil of secrecy. In that case this is simply not a movie for you, there are enough beautiful pure scientific movies, go for that! This movie is for philosophers, people in quest, spiritual starved people craving for new insights, dreamers, people in orthodox chains, etc. This movie doesn't have the answers, it never claims to have them. But what fun would it be if the makers of this movie just followed the protocol 'Pure scientific approach'? Wouldn't it be nothing more then a 13 in a dozen movie, a skinny version of Hawkings Universe? Its a movie, everybody has to decide for themselves what is true or not. The reason why the movie get a 7 out of ten is because of two lies. 1. The change of water after blessing and the intention of a thought. In fact it shows a molecule before and after freezing it. ( a shame ) 2. Quantum mechanics does not tell us that large objects like a basketball, a chair or a table or even persons are waves of possibilities. I think that this is the point Ramtha goes its own course and I go mine, still I keep the idea in mind. Its just fun to question it all and try to find answers. But it always is a mystery. That's why its fun in the first place. Like the following idea; 1+1=3 Why? For example; one person + one person = a group. Now you got one person, another person and a group. So 1+1=3 2=3.

The_Defiant1 This movie is a blend of new age thinking and what we know about quantum physics. This is basically an expanded version of the previous "What the Bleep?" movie but it provides a lot more depth.The most compelling aspect of this movie is not the specific examples they use, but the overall message that we create our own reality, we shape our own reality and we change reality.This movie uses both sound and questionable science to convey it's message. It is up to the user to come to their own conclusion about the implications.This movie is worthwhile for the simple fact it makes you think. It could be classified as it's own genre in that it blends the format of documentary and drama yet it is not a true example of either. You would not watch this for the drama, and the science is based on theory and speculation more so than hard fact.The added portions in this 2006 release make it better than the original. The editing is not as smooth, but the extra information allows you walk around with more things to ponder afterward.