mvenkata_ramesh
This series may not be a good one for the people who are in to the history, it may be misleading to those who don not have idea on history, but it gives an idea about History of Australia for those not in to history.Apart form that, it is not always possible to show "as it is" the history while reproducing the Movies and Shows. It is required to deviate a little bit but not too much, and introduce the romance, fun, foreplays, etc., bits to make it more entertaining. Other wise no will watch and no one will sponsor. One need to understand that.I have watched first season, to me it went well... Actions, Story is perfect, maintained Thrill & Kick through out the show. The Good script is always the one, which goes beyond the imagination of the viewers, that is it, it has got and it is more than enough to get 8 points. Sad it is cancelled, I don't see any reason to cancel this show.
tomgould749
How could anyone not like this. It is one of the most gut wrenching and unflinching period dramas I have ever seen. In almost all respects it reveals the hardships experienced by convicts and the sheer desperation of the soldiers and convicts alike. Following the excellent The Village and 37 Days the BBC has once again done itself proud. The climax although I will not go into detail is one of the most nerve shredding that I have ever seen in possibly any television drama or film for that matter. It's this kind of raw take on life that gives Banished and The Village their edge and given the emphasis in the past few years has started to move towards accuracy with regards to entertainment, it is almost refreshing that one of the UK's most respected institutions. I would recommend this to anyone.
mjrsnthl
How can you create an historical drama without the history? The colony was on full rations until 1790. Officers had no monopoly over female convicts. Until July 1788 the First Fleet was anchored in Sydney Cove. The Aborigines are invisible, but were spearing any Europeans who strayed beyond the camp which, unlike this series, was not next to the Pacific. Freeman is seen managing the 100+ km to Katoomba, when no European managed this until 1813. On attempting the Blue Mountains in December 1789 William Dawes's party reported that the terrain was entirely hostile. Ross was a Scot and Johnson from Yorkshire. And so it goes on. There appears to be almost a wilful policy of ignoring the extremely well-documented actualities.If McGovern had wished to set a series in a dystopian nightmare he didn't need to travesty the complex, nuanced and subtle history of early colonial Australia. He could have invented some futuristic corporation, or perhaps imagined a version of Putin's Russia.
challenged_traveller
That's how this program feels like each episode. Fantastic setting, Blue skies, green jungles, sunny beaches. The acting is first rate, the script is challenging enough to be fun without being too cerebral. That's what entertainment is supposed to be. Its one of those series where an hour is not long enough. As for realism, I don't want to see skanky teeth or manky uniforms but I do agree on the condition of Kitty's hair but then again 'maybe shes worth it'. Maybe in the second series, she looses her memory and The Major convinces her its May Belle Lynn McVitie This story could run and run as the New South Wales colony grows over the decade. If done properly, more series than Stargate SG1 Well done script writers and well done to the BBC for funding it. Feel free to making a remake of Mutiny On the Bounty or Hornblower or anything anywhere hot 'n' sunny on water or in a jungle and I'll be a fanboy of that too. :)