BobbyUK A reasonably high mark yet a derogatory opening statement? You must think I'm confused. Well, I'll explain later...This sitcom features two misfit flatmates who live in 69 Paradise Passage in Kentish Town (no sexual innuendo has gone unturned, lol). They are Lynda La Hughes (Kathy Burke), an unnatractive woman that has seemingly gone through every emotionally messed up experience going, has a very odd family with delusions of beauty and Tom Farrell (James Dreyfus) a homosexual struggling 'actor' who, despite only getting parts advertising sushi, has delusions of being a star.The show is about two people with inflated egos who wear denial as a protective shield around them and blaming everybody but themselves for their lot in life. The two housemates scream abuse at each other yet at the same time comfort when their insecurities do rise to the surface. The story here is about the destructive elements of dependence and how it keeps people from progressing forward as positive human beings.As well as seeing Lynda and Tom, we also meet neighbours Jez and Suze who seem to be the template of a typical happy couple that regularly flaunt their love for each other. Jez provides Tom and Lynda with enough lust and trivial competition to distract them from their mundane lives. Living above is Beryl the matter-of-fact old landlady and prostitute who lives above. The biggest part of the show is the two housemates inability to find love. La Hughes lives in a fairytale land thinking she is the 'ginger Jerry Hall' while Farrell day-dreams about sitting on a park bench with Simon Shepherd (lead actor in Peak Practice). The difference between the two is that Farrell does have brief relationships during the three series (most notably the man he accidentally picks up on a night out and the Rick Cheesecloth who advertises sofas) as La Hughes is usually unsuccessful (with exception to a possible lesbian fling with a taxi driver). To both Lynda and Tom, any relationship is a deliverance from the hell they both have created together, probably not realising they could easily create the same type of hell with their future love interests.The show in itself isn't rocket science but part of it's success is it's ability to be subversive and to change our attitude towards the lead roles which usually waver between downright disgust and pity (almost comparable to Harold and Albert Steptoe but done on a less sympathetic level). There are two problems with the show, the first one oddly being it's strength which are the lead roles themselves. Burke is well accustomed to playing masculine roles and Dreyfus is well accustomed to playing feminine roles and I wonder whether Lynda and Tom are merely a one-dimensional double act. The second is the lack of quality in the endings to some of the episodes (most notably the one where they presume Beryl is dead in a coffin but it turns out to be her twin sister - terrible).Dreyfus comes out better of the two as he is versatile enough to use his voice in lots of different ways (i.e the Cockney way he handles Freddy Windrush for example and his Northern 'chuck it in canal' monologue in the last ever episode is hilarious! Burke's portrayal of La Hughes tends to wear thin. Her joke is less complex and so needs to be stretched a lot more as a result.The final episode is pretty straight-forward apart from the incredibly sad ending. Tom leaves Lynda to play a bell-boy in Crossroads while Lynda is finally confronted with her demons and takes off her ginger wig to reveal a bald scalp before putting a tea cosy on her head and left to suck her thumb on her bed. Her 'security blanket' has left her and she finally has to face the truth that she isn't what she has taught herself to believe all this time.Now, coming back to the original line of my review. Why not a fourth series? Well...To start with it was impractical because both stars had upcoming commitments but, from an audience's viewpoint, a fourth series would expose the show's weaknesses and make it a more diluted affair (like watching any exhausted 'Carry on' film after 1970). Instead of being affected by their outbursts we would merely get bored and desensitised by them.

wereallmadhere Well I think the person that left the comment saying gimme gimme gimme is crap needs their heads read. I hardly would put the cast in the same category as Johnny Depp and Tom Hanks. While the two are amazing, it's like comparing chalk and cheese.Kathy Burke is a hugely talented comedy actress. She's awesome at what she does and I don't think this Australian bozo has any right to slag her and her co-stars off.I would like to see the comment-leaver do better.It's obvious that he/she couldn't, otherwise they would find something better to do than sit on their a r s e at the computer complaining.

David, Film Freak Kathy Burke is completely mental in her role as the wise-cracking, bed-hopping loud-mouth and she's one of the funniest women on TV right now!'Gimme, Gimme, Gimme' is a hilariously funny British TV show about a guy and girl, worlds apart who live together.Strong performances by both the lead stars with good jokes that never fall flat. Unfortunately Richard Dreyfuss wants out. So it won't be Gimme Gimme Gimme for much longer, huh?!

CELLIOTT10 This is one of the best english television series ever to have been released. It's basically about Linda (Kathy Burke) and Tom (James Drefus) who are roomates. Linda is backwards, sex mad, disgusting and unemployed. Tom is an out of work actor who's gay, self obsessed and he like to think of himself as middle class. Each week is a different story about what happens to them. But this really is hillarious any one will like it apart from snotty prudes. Watch It.