TheLittleSongbird I saw this on the Syfy channel, expecting it to be literally horse-poop. But while Dragon is far from a great film, it isn't awful either, better than in my opinion the tepid rating and reviews suggest. I did like the costumes, scenery and sets and the photography was mostly decent, the music was serviceable as were most of the effects and I did like the concept which looked as though I was despite Syfy's reputation of making mostly crap in for a typically fun fantasy film. As for the dragon, at times it does look good with an interesting design, but it is lacking in consistency and doesn't always blend well with its surroundings. The acting is also mixed, some are charismatic and likable, others are rather stiff. The characters aren't really that well written or developed but they aren't annoying or unlikeable mostly. Where I do find the most fault with Dragon is the sloppy direction, weak and cheesy script and uneven storytelling(too many scenes that either drag or serve little purpose to the plot). And also with the hackneyed fight sequences, tighter editing wouldn't have gone amiss. All in all, Dragon is far from great but I have seen a lot worse, and also despite its many problems this is one of Syfy's more tolerable films. 5/10 Bethany Cox

mono_mosh as much as we can all appreciate the time and effort that goes into film making, this movie could do with a lot of improvements and a story etc to fit the budget. seeing as it is part of a trilogy they would have been better to roll them all into one film and have a bigger budget.there is far too much talking in this movie. it is too easy to get bored waiting for something to happen. the shots fail to meet even basic film making techniques and i know first year students who have made a better job than this. the dragon does not even look rendered and more represents the early attempts at King Kong (and i mean terrible mechanical stuff about as scary as jaws). the props have all been taken from other movies. the elves look like bad attempts at making black people look like lord of the rings creatures.i cannot give a correct review as i skipped past more than half of it as it was so hard to keep watching. not a movie i recommend seeing unless you are looking for how not to make a movie. I'm shooting from a lower position than those who made this film but i am sure i can at least produce a dragon looks rendered or at least in colour.

fred-farahani Proved fact,,any movie directed or somehow Scot's done something in the movie just stay away,,waste of electricity your time,,money whatever... Scot harper must be from a mental institution or something,,i don't know who lets this useless idiot fag make movies, i mean if u ever see the name Harper ,just say no to the movie,,after watching that alien vs hunter of his,,damn, all i think is killing the producer, it'd actually make me feel good and i won't feel bad about it. i think i just want beat him to death, slow death ..don't ask my why SCot harper i hope u die and burn in hell and i don't know what to say, so Scot harper must die i just hope he dies before producing another movie

scioninja OK, first let me say that I love terrible movies. Attack of the Griffin was a recent favorite. It was so chock full of terrible acting, hilarious special effects and just all around poor quality that I loved it. My friends and I were laughing and cracking jokes the whole way through.I rented Dragon hoping for a similar experience. I was actually pretty excited. "How can they go wrong?", I thought. "It's a low-budget fantasy film and it's made by Asylum, it's got to be hilarious." Boy was I wrong. There was absolutely nothing funny about this train wreck of a film. We were actually reverting to making jokes about Attack of the Griffin while watching it, because this one gave us no material whatsoever. The acting wasn't funny, it was just bad. The actors made me want to cry rather than laugh. I felt embarrassed for them. Oh, and the direction... Leigh Scott needs to understand that things happen in movies. One of my friends jokingly suggested that a fifth grader could direct a better film. It's a funny suggestion, but unfortunately it's true. I would rather watch a screen adaptation of a ten year old's diary than sit through this rubbish.I can safely say I have never seen a more poorly conceived film. There is literally no plot. They never do anything in this movie. They stand around and talk. About what, I couldn't tell you, but they do it for hours on end, in between sparse and uneventful "action" scenes. I am seriously disgusted. No B movie has ever left me feeling like this. Leigh Scott should drop the camera and walk away. Right now.