adonis98-743-186503 Jason Stillwell, a Bruce Lee fan, is beaten numerous times and trains from the ghost of Lee. Jason then must use his newly acquired skills to save Seattle from a crime syndicate, whose top martial artist is the deadly Ivan. If i'm not mistaken this is JCVD's first film and damn was this fun? Actually i didn't know what to expect exactly but it was kind of Kickboxer meets Karated Kid meets Bloodsport and it's just as fun as all those movies combined plus evil Jean Claude Van Damme is always the best thing that we're ever gonna get. Totally Fun!!!! (10/10)

RandomFlux If it hadn't been for Rifftrax, I would never have seen this steaming pile.Sexist, racist, obnoxious in it's portrayal of humans as walking stereotypes, and a story a five year old might have put together with about as much continuity and depth.It's sad to think people saw this mess as anything but a bad parody.I realize 80's tech doesn't compare to what we have now but it still looks and sounds like it was filmed and recorded using a potato.What 'story' there is, consists of the plot from any generic, low-budget, Kung-fu movie.The 'filler' between the laughably choreographed fights consists of training montages, an attempt at a music video, some terrible characters being terrible, and lots of pointless, awful dialogue.If you watch this movie without Rifftrax, you are wasting time that you will never get back. Don't do it. It's not worth it.

elshikh4 Let me begin by saying that the evil boy was too comic to be evil. And the mike, while being so visible, was too evil to be comic !The acting is dead in this movie. I don't know why everybody was smiling all the time?! The movie's Bruce Lee is a shame. Anybody adores the man must feel rage for the idiot way he's honored in this. Kurt McKinney looked like a young Jim Carry yet dull. The actor who played his father looked 2 years older than him (you can't give birth while you're 2 !). So according to this cast; I couldn't tell who was funny and who wasn't, because frankly they were all FUNNY !The direction is beyond the Razzie, it's more primitive than (Foxy Brown). On second thought (Foxy) shines as a classic compared to this ! There are just cadres with people somehow talk and move in them. The smell of arty is anywhere but here. Yet, the black rectangles, to cover the mike's many appearances, proved to be something I didn't watch in any cinema to date !I kept telling myself during the whole movie; was that (The Karate Kid), released one year earlier to great success, but with no budget, no artwork, and lousy Bruce Lee's impersonator instead of Mr. Miyagi ?! It's now proved that the director of (No Retreat..), Corey Yuen, had watched (The Karate Kid), liked the movie, but thought that the fight sequences could have been a lot better. So why not remaking it within 2 years of it, with better fight sequences and worse EVERYTHING ! FYI it was released in Europe under the name of (Karate Tiger) ! I couldn't stand what's called authentic fighting, since the movie itself was evicting me successfully. To tell you the truth I went laughing all through it. I recalled (Be Kind Rewind – 2008), as if I was watching one of its Sweded versions; which were cheesy remakes of famous Hollywood movies, unbelieving its homemade-like movie-making. It's a rare time when such a movie with low quality spawns sequels like that (4 till 1992). So why did people, in 1986, love this Sweded Karate Kid ?!In fact, it was the age of the American Martial Arts movies. After being used to be made in Asia of the 1970s, it turned into a fashion in America of the 1980s. Rocky (1976) started it, then the boom came with The Karate Kid (1984), American Ninja (1985), No Retreat, No Surrender (1986), Bloodsport (1988), Best of the Best (1989), Kickboxer (1989), and Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles (1990) with, save Kickboxer, at least 2 sequels for every movie. Regardless of any artistic level, the Americans, in that era, were desperately hungry for this type of movies. Because after many hippie existential anti-heroes in the 1970s, there was a need for a tough hero, who acts more than thinks. Notice too that it's mostly starring teens, which is a Star Wars & E.T. effect that clicked rightly. And it mirrored a desire for different taste of action, the Martial Arts, as something else the usual goods of Hollywood back then. Add to that a possible extra reason; concerning how during the 1970s the Asian Martial Arts movie had established some kind of fan base in America, so by the mid-1980s it was about time to produce it yet by American money and talents.On the other hand it assures that sometimes, some desperate times, success has nothing to do with things like artistic level. Or maybe the 1980s was the time of innocence, so simply the innocent viewers loved an innocent movie; not "one for the 1980s" in my book though ! Because when I watched (No Retreat..) for the first time, in 2011, while being in my thirties I got turned off utterly, seeing nothing that could intercede for it. It's for an American-teen-in-the-1980s exclusively I think ! P.S : It's hard to believe that its director, Corey Yuen, partially directed (The Transporter – 2002). Not too hard when you know that he handled the martial arts and action sequences only !

John Reid This isn't all that bad as far as really corny b grade 80's martial arts flicks go, tho yes, admittedly if not for the presence of van damme the whole thing would have no doubt got lost in the archivesThe acting was not great, cringe worthy was 'deans' performance, kelly was awful, heh the fat guy and the lead seemed to be the best actors there! van damme hardly spoke English then so that forgiven, hell he sure makes up for it tho in fight scenesI liked this (mostly for van damme) it takes me back to my childhood and it tries to be fun fun and engaging, the fight scenes are quite good, production values aside, it could have been better but they did what they could with what modest budget they obviously had and came out with a winnersolid 7/10