danielporterdoran Folks should be aware that Red Letter Media's 'Space Cop' project is a compendium of inside jokes accumulated over almost a decade. Thus it is entertaining and satisfying to followers of the group (and their excellent reviews), but it will not stand on its own as a movie that outsiders would enjoy. Those complaining about the cost bemuse me, as it's not clear why they purchased a Blu-Ray of a film they knew nothing about -- but I'm sure Red Letter Media values the financial support (which can help them keep making their insightful reviews).

dinklesteinburgantonio I'm a big fan of RLM and have been for a while, I got this for my birthday and laughed the whole way. As a film, it's definitely not that good, but as a comedy by these guys, it's better than I'd expected. I gave it such a high rating purely because I had lots of fun watching it and I'm beyond happy that I got it. 10s come from filmmaking masterpieces in my reviewing, this perfect score is because I expected them to make fun schlock and got super schlock, it got a 10.

Ole Oberländer I love RLM and was really looking forward to this. This movie was hard to watch, but since I payed $25 for it, I had to watch it. Watching it felt like sitting in a doctor's waiting room for 3 hours. The commentary track was more entertaining than the movie itself. It surprised me a lot that RLM managed to make so many mistakes even though they should've learned from the mistakes of other film makers since they criticize them in Half in a Bag and Best of the Worst like real professionals.The 2 main characters in this film were horrible. They weren't even real characters. I managed to accept Rich Evans' over-the-top Space Cop performance as it seemed so ridiculous that it kind of got funny again. Mike Stoklasa's detective from the past though was just painful to watch as it seemed like a cynical attempt of playing a comic relief character without any mentionable character traits. I guess Mike was aware of the shittiness of his character and felt no need to hide this. I feel bad for the other actors, because they could've turned this movie into something great would they've played the lead roles as well. Or maybe everybody else was acting too well and made especially the RLM gang look bad? I think Jay did a good job even though he seems way to nice to be a villain-ish character and fell short when acting with the real actors.The movie as a whole was entertaining in certain moments, but boring and shameful to watch in many of the others. They often tried to be funny no matter what and sacrificed the credibility of the world they've created. As many lines were improvised there were loads of long tripod shots which made it obvious that they were on a set. More cuts and close ups instead of tripod boredom would've made this much better and less boring to watch (and much more work to edit). A shame that they cut out the ghost of Jack, which was part of the deleted scenes.Nonetheless what they've managed to accomplish is highly impressive to me. The sets, costumes and special effects are dope! I hope on their next film they'll prioritize character building and action scenes a little more so it's not too focused on acting. Also they should make use of green screen technology more often to avoid monotone and lifeless sets.

Jack Yates This film was so dense, every single image had so much going on. There were lots of hidden easter eggs, you didn't notice it...but your brain did.No but seriously, I did find this legitimately funny. As soon as RLM announced that they would be making this (about 12 years ago) I knew it would be gold...and it was! The sets and props looked appropriately cheesy and the classic RLM humour was all there. I really hope Rich wins an Oscar for his performance here. He certainly deserves it. I hope they do a 'Best of the Worst' episode where they watch this movie, that'd be great...oh and another Plinkett review. YOU HACK FRAUDS!I rate this 10 out of 10 Pizza rolls!